173700+ entries in 0.106s
mircea_popescu: asciilifeform empire wants headcount, (because it sold itself on
the lie of equality). gets headcount. except...
mircea_popescu: everyone, at any point, without exception got EXACTLY what
they asked for.
mircea_popescu: that was, since i was a wee
tyke,
the one fascinating, ceaselessly fascinating aspect of
the world :
that for all
teh chagrin and professed despair and broken dreams hopes and aspirations etcetera
mircea_popescu: but hey, fair is fair -- everyone gets what he says he wants and
then gets
to wash his head with it.
mircea_popescu: gotta have all female values, an' selective privacy is
teh foremost on
the list.
mircea_popescu: "the land is not built for equality", how about
that one ?
mircea_popescu: somehow if you go "the collegiate dorm is not built for modesty"
they,
the very same
they, go in an uproar.
mircea_popescu: the brits however, losing more men
to spying
than
to
trenchlines in some days, nevertheless...
mircea_popescu: zee germans, getting it in every hole from
teh brits, didn't really do much in
the way of "shot british spy" photo ops.
mircea_popescu: it's funny how repeating
this pattern is : whosoever is on
the receiving end of
the cock, whatever
the cock may be, doesn't really want porn around.
mircea_popescu: was
there an actual german spy shot in britain at any point ?
mircea_popescu: asciilifeform lol, considering how many brits zee germans shot for
that...
mircea_popescu: in any event,
the pretense of hey, we're just
talking hurr isn't going
to
take one far here. if
that wasn't obvious.
deedbot: mircea_popescu updated rating of daffadil from 1
to -1 << lies conversationally.
daffadil: Haha yes. As
the paper currently presents,
the system is not built for privacy, especially if it uses publicly-indexed databases. However I
thought
that
the idea of using mutational randomness as a physical process
to generate private keys was interesting.
mircea_popescu: hey,
they keep working
to convince idiots someone somewhere would actually WANT
to drink carbonic acid solution with 5k brix.
mircea_popescu: even in
the particular
that literacy is reserved for a precious few.
a111: Logged on 2015-04-02 14:59 asciilifeform: 'Identity-based encryption is a
type of public-key encryption in which any arbitrary string (such as a user’s email address) can be used as a public key, enabling data
to be protected without
the need for long, randomly generated keys or certificates.
Today,
there are numerous standards for IBE based on Boneh’s work, including IEEE P1363.3 and several IETF RFCs.' << from
the press release.
mircea_popescu: did you read
the "whores moaning in orgasmic agony source of rng"
thread ?
daffadil: This might be interesting
to some: "DNA based Random Key Generation and Management for OTP Encryption"
jhvh1: asciilifeform:
The operation succeeded.
deedbot: asciilifeform updated rating of ave1 from 1
to 3 << gnatronicist
ave1: will do, I will probably create version of musl_cross
that does all
this
ave1: plus add ada
to
the languages
to build
ave1: if you get musl_cross, and replace
the gcc-4.9.4-musl.diff
therein with
this one
ave1: of clean gcc 4.9.4 from FSF
to a gcc 4.9.4
that build with musl + gnat
☟︎ ave1: ok,
this is
the diff (also contains musl diffs from musl_cross)
ave1: one moment, I will look for
the diff
ave1: yes, but mainly because
the gnat makefiles hardcode
the gnattool names at different places
☟︎ ave1: I like
to default it
to building static files binaries
☟︎ ave1: p.s.
the portage ebuild does exactly
this (plus some gentoo patching)
ave1: copy gcc-interface-*
to gcc-4.9-*/gcc/ada/gcc-interface (so rename of dir)
ave1: copy gnat-gpl-*/src/ad
to gcc-4.9-*/gcc/ (so you get an ada dir under gcc)
shinohai: ave1: Can you link me
to
the adacore sources
that worked for you?
ave1: ok, I will do some more banging against
the wall on
this
ave1: and gcc 4.9.4 does so, but
the adacore code has problems
ave1: p.s. I want
to
throw it out, but I like
to have a version
that cross compiles
to ppc64le
ave1: asciilifeform, how did you get your 4.9 version (I see
two version in gentoo) ?
ave1: (but
the 4.9 gcc from adacore does not match any 4.9.* release from FSF)
☟︎ ave1: I can build a gnat using
the sources from adacore and all is fine
ave1: (and GPL 2014 and gcc 4.9.4 are
the same)
ave1: well I went
to
the source code of 4.9.4 and GPL 2015 and it differs on
this point
☟︎ ave1: yes, it seems
that FSF gnat (the one in gcc) is not updated recently and for some reason it's really hard
to compare version numbers between all
the different gnats
☟︎ shinohai: ave1 .... I got
the same error as you (Have not looked into it further yet
though)
ave1: (like
the Mul functions...)
ave1: It seems
that version has problems with inlined functions containing inlined functions
ave1: (also in gcc 5.*, I've not looked in
the 6.* range)
ave1: Turns out
the version of gnat in gcc 4.9.* is based on GNAT GPL 2014 (from adacore)
ave1: mod6, asciilifeform: I've been playing with GNAT versions and
the fact code
lobbes: BingoBoingo: <lobbes> damn. looks like my plans for my old craptop being a
trb node will have
to wait until I secure better iron. << Why can old craptop not eat SSD? << wtf I didn't even consider
this. And yeah,
this'll be a great opportunity
to clean out
the physical crap
that's probably choking out
the airflow in
the
thing.
BingoBoingo: Product nothing seriously
toxic, just permetherins and fuller's earth but still.
BingoBoingo wonders how reactive a hand santizer would have
to be
to reliably convert most organic compounds
to "safe" forms. Likely would look like a hand solving vat of H2SO4 + H2O2
BingoBoingo has met people who after
touching granular pesticide barehanded
tried
to insist "hand sanitizer" was sufficient cleaning.
BingoBoingo: Well,
this is
the story of how
the puritains ruined America. "It dun work" "Have you
tried cleaning it?" "STFU Imma not
touch
the filth" ... Disposable everythings
mircea_popescu: or in other words, innocence and drunkedness are, in
that order,
the superlative degrees of unhygienicity.
mircea_popescu: well certainly people who don't know
they come apart don't regularly anything.
mircea_popescu: a sentiment i can sympathize with -- no better way
to ruin
the day of cleanfreak chick
than making her open up her years-old laptop.
BingoBoingo: <lobbes> damn. looks like my plans for my old craptop being a
trb node will have
to wait until I secure better iron. << Why can old craptop not eat SSD?