16500+ entries in 0.097s
deedbot:
mircea_popescu updated rating of sina from 1 to 2 << MPFHF canonical implementation.
deedbot:
mircea_popescu rated sina 1 at 2017/06/03 05:09:48 << missed on all the things!
sina:
mircea_popescu: if you have more fun stuff to code pls let me know
sina:
mircea_popescu: want me to link to github repos instead?
sina:
mircea_popescu: I pasted the python impl and it mangled my tabbing...I guess I wouldn't care normally but it's going ot be annoying for people to paste that and re-indent, any feature about preserving tabbing in your comment section?
sina:
mircea_popescu: is there any interest in a tmsr company offering stuff like git hosting etc?
sina:
mircea_popescu: still around?
ben_vulpes:
mircea_popescu: all those consed bytes came from logging
candi_lustt:
mircea_popescu: #*1111111010101111011001101011011111101000101011111101011110010111010011100111000011000101000010111000111011110100100101010011011111010111001011011101010011011101011000100010001000111110000010010011001100011111100000100001010111101111010110000111010101011100
candi_lustt:
mircea_popescu: #*01101000010111101000010110001100001011110000110000101110110101111010010101000000011011111010011011110001001100010111101010011100
candi_lustt:
mircea_popescu: #*0010111010001000101011101000100000110011110111011111001001110010
candi_lustt:
mircea_popescu: #*0110100011001111010010001111100000000001110001111000001001000001
sina:
mircea_popescu: can you confirm/clarify same statement above, start at 0 or 1?
ben_vulpes:
mircea_popescu: and i worked this example at one point, i'm pretty sure the expected value of 011 is correct
sina:
mircea_popescu: can you confirm/clarify "his operation consists of taking the bit count of either S or R, iterating over that value, at each step multiplying the iterator with the current position in M" ...
sina:
mircea_popescu: there was a bug in my screw method which caused the cycle, once I identified it, it stopped cycling
sina:
mircea_popescu: nope
mircea_popescu: try <
mircea_popescu> candi_lustt: (mpfhf:mpfhf #*11111111111111111111111111111111 64)
sina:
mircea_popescu: ok thanks
sina:
mircea_popescu: earlier you said half screw should round down. In that case, if len is 1 the halfscrew will be 0. so should no iterations be peformed on halfscrew where the len is 1?
candi_lustt:
mircea_popescu: #*00000000000000000000000000000000
candi_lustt:
mircea_popescu: #*0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
sina:
mircea_popescu: seems you're correct, "MP kicks3453453453 ass!" still loops
ben_vulpes:
mircea_popescu: perhaps to start with simpler runs?
ben_vulpes: hey sina
mircea_popescu logs for comparison
sina:
mircea_popescu: per the spec, " During each step, the function considers whether the position-th bit in M is 0 or 1, and executes a defined set of operations in either case. Once the operations have been executed, the position is incremented by one."
sina:
mircea_popescu: pls help me understand rewind? doesn't it guarantee loops if I end up in a step which has a rewind? because I will go back one and then rewind?
sina:
mircea_popescu: can you point if I'm missing something obvious? From my understanding of the spec, the number of "steps" is = the length of M, but in your examples (understanding they're of a nonworking prototype) have a lot more steps than len(M)
sina:
mircea_popescu: lollll I had it doing that but removed those lines
sina:
mircea_popescu: can I ask you to verify behaviour of half screw when the length of S or R is not even?
sina:
mircea_popescu: hey mate
ben_vulpes: !~later tell sina
mircea_popescu wants mpfhf commentary on his blog
a111: Logged on 2017-06-09 09:05
mircea_popescu: and i suspect alf is either making a c one or trying to talk himself into it
jhvh1: sina: Error: The "Later" plugin is loaded, but there is no command named "
mircea_popescu" in it. Try "list Later" to see the commands in the "Later" plugin.
jhvh1: sina: Error: I haven't seen
mircea_popescu, I'll let you do the telling.
ben_vulpes:
mircea_popescu: naively, i passed a function called from within the scope a reference to the thing
ben_vulpes: perhaps
mircea_popescu can enlighten me as to why exactly it works this way
sina:
mircea_popescu: I work on the biggest python turd of all, OpenStack :P
a111: Logged on 2017-06-09 04:38
mircea_popescu: wotopen at any rate
candi_lustt:
mircea_popescu: #*00000000000000000000000000001001
candi_lustt:
mircea_popescu: #*00000000000000000000000000000011
candi_lustt:
mircea_popescu: #*11111111111111111111111111110110
candi_lustt:
mircea_popescu: #*11111111011101110111011101001000
candi_lustt:
mircea_popescu: #*1100000000000000000000000000000
candi_lustt:
mircea_popescu: #*000000000000000000000000000000011
candi_lustt:
mircea_popescu: #*00000000000000000000000000000000
candi_lustt:
mircea_popescu: #*01000010000100100011111111110001
ben_vulpes: asciilifeform,
mircea_popescu: ^^ sad output
BingoBoingo: <
mircea_popescu> wotopen at any rate << For most codechimps this is the most closed of all
ben_vulpes: asciilifeform: while the individual operations work, it does not yield what
mircea_popescu's implementation yields
ben_vulpes: i suspect that i hadn't yet verified output against the runs that
mircea_popescu posted
a111: Logged on 2015-03-06 03:29
mircea_popescu: if you are one of the people buying belgian rubber concessions on the stock exchanges, you make money. if you're in africa, you make quick with the hands and feet.