147400+ entries in 1.133s

williamdunne: More like an airport with a pet airline
I think
williamdunne: flyplymouth: Not sure how that works, so
I won't comment. Anyhow. How do you stress test a business plan?
mircea_popescu:
i still don't understand what stress testing a business plan involves.
williamdunne: flyplymouth: And
I know business model is different,
I meant more along the lines of bandwidth, plane size etc
williamdunne: flyplymouth: In comparison to Exeter how big was Plymouth? Exeter is kinda shit.
I prefer just to go to London something
jurov:
i don't think win compatibility is major problem
mircea_popescu: easier to give you btc
i think. which windowses can you do ?
jurov: mircea_popescu:
i see eulora moving, can we talk about release engineering reward?
williamdunne: Keyserver thing could be ...kinda useful
I guess?
ascii_field: mats:
i distinctly recall hearing of this before
ascii_field: jurov: sure.
i was trying to point out that the answer 'well firewall it off' is not a pill against this kind of thing
mod6: <+ascii_field> mod6:
i was simply pointing out that it is not, afaik, part of the official therealbitcoin tree as of yet. << ahh corret.
ascii_field: mod6:
i was simply pointing out that it is not, afaik, part of the official therealbitcoin tree as of yet.
mod6: Then it was working well as far as
I know.
assbot: Logged on 01-06-2015 14:53:54; mod6: <+shinohai> To whatever peers it connects to instead of specifying ip's << hi! glad you're having some success,..
I thought we added ascii's dns snip patch? Or did
I mis-remember that? you did have to use "addnode=" in your bitcoin.conf right?
shinohai: np jurov,
I signed up for mailing list last week
assbot: Logged on 01-06-2015 14:53:54; mod6: <+shinohai> To whatever peers it connects to instead of specifying ip's << hi! glad you're having some success,..
I thought we added ascii's dns snip patch? Or did
I mis-remember that? you did have to use "addnode=" in your bitcoin.conf right?
shinohai:
I like to be prepared for all contingencies.
Landgull: So why is it that all of the sudden
I'm hearing about people wanting to put everything and their cat in the blockchain? Is it actually a good idea, or is it just a way to attack/overwhelm the network?
Landgull: Mmm, echo chambers only matter to politicians pandering to votes, though. Or 50%+1 attacks via democracy,
I suppose.
☟︎ Landgull: At any rate,
I've been reading the logs for a bit and
I like the kind of discussion that seems to happen in here, so
I thought
I'd say hi.
mircea_popescu:
i would guess it'd depend just how desperate they are.
mod6: eh,
i must be stale again
mod6: <+shinohai> To whatever peers it connects to instead of specifying ip's << hi! glad you're having some success,..
I thought we added ascii's dns snip patch? Or did
I mis-remember that? you did have to use "addnode=" in your bitcoin.conf right?
☟︎☟︎ Landgull: Hey,
I didn't say he was right - just that someone with a botnet thinks he's right.
shinohai:
I have that same line already ?
shinohai: But yes,
I see the point. Perhaps irc is the best way to find non-gavinized nodes.
shinohai:
I know it was removed, but when
I last spoke to mod6
I think he told me to just connect normally for now
assbot: Logged on 01-06-2015 13:55:14; shinohai: mod6 when you return, wanted to let you know
I built without the irc peer discovery and it works nice.
shinohai: mod6 when you return, wanted to let you know
I built without the irc peer discovery and it works nice.
☟︎ punkman:
I think
I put in all the patches currently listed on thebitcoin.foundation front page, except perhaps static-makefile.tar.gz. And used whatever openssl etc that was present on my debian7 system.
punkman: maybe
I had wrong openssl version, dunno
assbot: Logged on 01-06-2015 09:11:43; punkman: and when
I tried to verify all of them, it blew up before block 150k
assbot: Logged on 01-06-2015 07:22:44; mats:
i miss assbot titles
mircea_popescu: same thing
i did about doge, keisercoin, auroracoin, younameitcoin
punkman: and when
I tried to verify all of them, it blew up before block 150k
☟︎ chalbersma: Think is
I don't think that anybody is actually using ATC P2Pool implementation anymore. The contract for the build had 1 month of runtime and then MP and Ragnar
I believe ran the p2pool node for a while. But ATC didn't seem to catch on that much.
Vexual:
i assumed vault was just a word that presumed they were better than apple at storing nudes, so
i didnt look
assbot: Logged on 11-05-2015 20:00:50; mircea_popescu: "TLDR
I ran afl-fuzz against libbitcoinconsensus to discover interesting Bitcoin scripts and used them to search for Bitcoin reimplementations vulnerable to forking. This discovered two bugs in btcd by Conformal. See the bitcoinconsensus_testcases repository for the discovered Bitcoin scripts."
decimation: heh yeah when reading that bastards section
I ran into "CCriticalSection" stuff - which apparently all came from mfc shit
decimation:
I guess
I'm saying: did satoshi fail to clean up clutter as he went along?
decimation: asciilifeform:
I see lots of std::vector and associated bs in your igprof stuff
mod6: <+asciilifeform> not 100% certain that we're all using same bdb... << but anyway, yeah,
I'll check anyway. there is a chance that we could be looking at two seperate versions.
decimation: asciilifeform:
I'm using the auto.sh build
mod6: <+asciilifeform> our ver. of bdb actually lacks the set_memory_max << OH. ok did not realize that. damn. well,
i'll mention this fact in next months letter. should hvae asked.
mod6:
I should have put in a line maybe about "encouraged to read the submitted emails" or something, but perhaps
I just thought it was implied.
Adlai:
i've heard they're great for hammering in nails
ben_vulpes: trinque and
i were wondering about their CLIM implementations, and if documentation etc was better on the closed-source side of the world
assbot: Logged on 31-05-2015 22:53:20; midnightmagic: williamdunne: If you're quick enough,
I suppose. Also, this is presuming the host itself isn't in some fashion pwned, since who knows how it was actually compromised considering the physical drives are unavailable for examination.
assbot: Logged on 31-05-2015 21:27:33; asciilifeform:
i don't even apprehend why this 'jam tomorrow' nonsense was even in there in the first place.
assbot: Logged on 31-05-2015 21:23:54; asciilifeform:
http://log.bitcoin-assets.com/?date=31-05-2015#1149116 <<
i tried various values of 'misbehave' increment per orphan block - 20, 50, even 100. in my tests, this made sync... slower. reason, as
i understand, was that 1) you lose time renegotiating connection 2) overwhelmingly likely that any node you reconnect to -also- shits just as many orphans.
Lk4_DPB:
i would not know, perhaps it was not a smart question
Adlai: although
i guess it could be an experiment, and the experimenters wanted to only diddle their own keys, to minimize collateral damage
Lk4_DPB:
i was at some event in milano and they talked about assets as a the place that knoews best about bitcoin adn that discovered a probem with rsa keys
danielpbarron: >> At this time,
I oppose increasing the block size limit as per Gavin's proposal.
midnightmagic: williamdunne: If you're quick enough,
I suppose. Also, this is presuming the host itself isn't in some fashion pwned, since who knows how it was actually compromised considering the physical drives are unavailable for examination.
☟︎ williamdunne:
i.e using the cheap blades how many servers can you fit per maybe 48us?
williamdunne: jurov: Wow,
I can get you better than that. Thats pretty pathetic
jurov:
I personally got only an offer to share a rack with 4x100MBit(can be upgraded to giga) and 4xIPv4 for 500 euro/mo
☟︎ jurov: williamdunne: yes
i knew about it. but, what do you think "victim of its own success" mean? :DDD
jurov: premature optimization,
i guess
decimation: but
I'm not sure if those checks actually are effective in the bastards case, gonna need to read more code
decimation: asciilifeform: yeah
I'm trying to crawl my way through it. are these nodes actually hostile or do they just not have the full blockchain?
decimation:
I added the ip of the node that was passed when ProccesBlock was called
decimation: asciilifeform: as an example,
I have 131 'BASTARDS' between two accepts