142700+ entries in 1.15s

mats:
i was also watching the stream
trinque:
I have sometimes been so worried about what huffing isopropyl alcohol did to me that
I have even faked symptoms so that
I could go to the doctor repeatedly and get all kinds of check-ups. <<
I gotta wonder if these people aren't just addicted to the notion that they're doing something crazy and bad.
trinque:
I'm sure in this case he means it.
trinque:
I've heard that one re: cocaine too
trinque: "
I did it because
i like the smell." << bahaha
decimation: honestly
I usually end up reading C++ reference books and mumbling to myself
ben_vulpes: maybe? perhaps
i'm speaking poorly of ignorance.
ben_vulpes: maybe someday
i'll understand what precisely's going on in serialize.h
assbot: Logged on 28-06-2015 04:59:46; decimation:
I find it unlikely that the fsf will outlive him
assbot: Logged on 28-06-2015 04:31:39; trinque: ben_vulpes: y'know no sooner do
I even consider relocating to the land of capitalism and Portland's like "but dude! an army of titties on bikes!"
mircea_popescu: asciilifeform to answer earlier q :
i think for thius purpose (running on dulap etc) static glibc is exactly right.
decimation: yeah, as far as
I can tell gpl only really 'sticks' to fsf software directly
decimation: but
I recognize that rms' stand is probably the only way
decimation: all
I want is a world where
I get source when
I get software
decimation:
I find it unlikely that the fsf will outlive him
☟︎ ben_vulpes: erm
i thought bitcoind *did* service one at a time, looping over sockets
decimation: no and as
I recall there's hand-written asm in openssl
decimation: might need to start at that level
I guess.
trinque: decimation: sounds kinda like what
I understand nginx to be
trinque: maybe
I should get more drunk and see if pete_dushenski ends up writing about it
trinque: this
I think has something to do with the political problems throughout time
trinque: ben_vulpes: y'know no sooner do
I even consider relocating to the land of capitalism and Portland's like "but dude! an army of titties on bikes!"
☟︎ mod6:
I can work on that and see where
I can get with it; then
I have to start working on the SoBA for June.
mod6: asciilifeform: thanks a lot for your work tonight on the Static Builder.
I'm a bit zapped to start getting into that tonight. Is it cool with you if
I start testing it out tomorrow morning?
mod6:
I remember from the block 168`001 issue (tx verification failed) that it would start dumping tons of errors if truly stuck.
mod6: yeah, they were pretty blown away when
I just came and told 'em
i was gonna scrap it.
mod6: so now
I've got this company to pay $185 and take it off my hands for scrap. hahah
mircea_popescu: asciilifeform anyway, ok if
i move back to public access for this ?
assbot: Logged on 28-06-2015 02:47:49; asciilifeform: (though
i'd like to shoot that 'gconv-modules.cache' and 'locale-archive' crud in the head...)
mod6: my pos car got a flat today, so
I limped it up to the station to get a new tire & walked the ~3 miles back.
mod6: If you stripped out all of the DNS stuff and then did a build with gcc/glibc
I'm thinking that would get us where we want to be; sounds like you've done that!
mod6: <+asciilifeform> now what
i can't remember is whether mod6 already had this orchestra working <+asciilifeform> (with glibc+static) << v0.5.3.1-RELEASE basically is not true "static" build because of the gethostbyname() (DNS/libnss) calls in there. but was trying to build static bitcoind with uclibc/gcc on gentoo, was hitting a problem described here before. If you stripped out all of the DNS stuff and then did a build with gcc/glibc
I'm thinkin
trinque:
I know...
I'll invent a syntax!
decimation:
I kinda get the impression that about 99% of iptables implementations out there are 'cut n paste' from what someone else posted on some website
mircea_popescu: honestly,
i don't think that iptables thing actually works.
trinque: strikes me as "promises" to indicate the braindamaged programming environments
I've sued
trinque: asciilifeform: am
I in the ballpark... having the vague notion that c-gates would be used to indicate whether the inputs necessary to perform a computation are available?
trinque: mircea_popescu: because layering another turd atop iptables is surely what you want...
I find ufw a nice tool to deal with trivial firewall setups
mircea_popescu: iptables -
I INPUT -p tcp ! -s <permittedIP> -j DROP << is that it ?
Chicago: decimation, Sure
I'm a crypto fan. :)
ben_vulpes: ultraconfused, had to remember why
i hadn't responded to the ;;later
assbot: Logged on 26-06-2015 19:46:42; mircea_popescu: it is not the foundation one, which
i am going to compile and run once the instructions come out.
ben_vulpes:
i wonder how long it'll take to duplicate the feat.
ben_vulpes:
i am interested in things like 'literate programming' in the context of mathematical education, essay writing etc
trinque: given that
I'm already using an absurd compromise (stumpwm+emacs)
I'd take something which measurably improves what
I'm doing there already