6 entries in 0.451s
a111: 4 results for "paraconsistent", http://btcbase.org/log-search?q=paraconsistent
Framedragger: !#s paraconsistent
Framedragger: also, i wonder what you'd make of paraconsistent logic and if you'd like to write an article on it at some future point
Framedragger: (what's nice with these paraconsistent systems is that they may not crumble down when encountering some or other kind of logical paradox.) </weird-rant>
Framedragger: (in paraconsistent systems, they try to "contain" cases when `p && ~p`. normally by principle of explosion you can prove anything (`1. p. 2. p || q [from 1, disjunctive addition.] 3. ~p [given.] 4. q [from 2. and 3.]`). these systems remove one or another inference rule (e.g. that p || q may follow from p, or double negation, or something else), or *suspend* it, in the fashion that some equations may have complex numbers as intermediary
Framedragger: alsoalso, graham priest's paraconsistent logic is an interesting thing.