log☇︎
995900+ entries in 0.821s
Namjies: "some criticized the plan as being impossible"
Namjies: "We'll proceed this way, it works because" -> "This cannot possibly work because"
jurov: then i have to retrace anf think maybe it's not a fact, jsut assumption
smickles: anywah, that's the crux of the debate
jurov: yes, i parse such sentence like they're criticizing known fact
Namjies: Or criticize can simply mean you judged something to be X based on what you see.
smickles: google says it's "Indicate the faults of (someone or something) in a disapproving way", and fault as "An unattractive or unsatisfactory feature", that sound to me as if it was something that is proven
Namjies: "some criticize smickles for being a douche" The point is not proven but someone is criticizing you for it.
smickles: that would be "Some criticize Bitcoin, claiming it is a [[Ponzi scheme]].." tho
Namjies: It just says some people think it is a Ponzi.
smickles: it basically says, it's a ponzi, and some criticize it b/c of that
smickles: I don't quite se how that doesn't imply it is a ponzi
Namjies: No. But I know that's not how the general public would read it.
smickles: Namjies: do you think the original statement implied that it actually is a ponzi?
Namjies: You have to think around the limitations.
Namjies: As it's a relevant information to the fact (the "incident")
smickles: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=127096.0 Oh, by the way, i'm suprised i wasn't mentioned here, and mircea_popescu was edited out
Namjies: So long as that incident is big enough.
smickles: reputable institutions said that someone heard it said that...
Namjies: I said make sure your name is in the news.
smickles: isn't that part of the point in haveing it removed?
Namjies: "Name has blocked bridge/shot people/other claiming the President is a prostitute. The incident... President's reaction..."
smickles: heh, they don't usually give the names of people saying baseless things
Namjies: Yeah, well just make sure your name is in the news as a crazy nutjob claiming the president is a prostitute.
smickles: (did i spell that correctly?)
Azelphur: yea, wikipedia is meant to be about facts :p
smickles: lol, Namjies those refrences never said who accused it of being a ponzi
Azelphur: on that basis I accuse the US president of being a prostitute
Azelphur: Namjies: that kind of thing is stupid to have on an article lol
smickles: and don't link to a source saying that people say it has been accused of being a ponzi
Namjies: Now they got removed.
Namjies: That section didn't state if that was right or no, just that some people claimed so.
Namjies: What? It was only truths!
Azelphur: smickles: good that it got removed
smickles: http://blog.smickles.com/bitcoin/the-ponzi-of-wikipedia-and-bitcoin/#update_22nov12 << Even though mircea_popescu disagrees, I know some of you care ;)
Namjies: Not really the same area...
Namjies: Hah, much shorter than my TOS
Ukto: havent seen the new list stuff yet to make sure its the same
Ukto: I have an asset list import system && claim system based on the way info was presented to Goat a few months ago
Ukto: I like the community. heh
Ukto: I have been handling lots of btc for quite a few ppl for a while now, and am heavily invested, I dont plan to run away anytime w/ anything.
Ukto: i hate all the ppl who write all the proper crap, and it turns out to be bs
Ukto: this is bitcoin. any tos other than that is a lie
smickles: nice TOS
pigeons: ok, when i tested it was under hashpower downain
Ukto: wouldnt want someone to accidentally "donate" ;)
Ukto: its in test mode, so no deposits, or withdraws atm
smickles: "long time member of the bitcoin community"
Ukto: all the tests have been great
smickles: his tagline is pissing me off
Ukto: pigeons: well, I am about to turn my system on. gonna add api trading tonight/tomorrow.
smickles: Ukto: he claimed to be going from largest to smallest
pigeons: well ibb is also one of the oldest still running
Ukto: I expected to see some others before IBB
smickles: i mean, s2cm wasn't all that big, but ibb was tiny
Ukto: yeah, I was just noticing that myself
Ukto: ahh, thanks pigeons.
Namjies: no BTC-BOND/KRAKEN thus far.
Ukto: know who else besides gigavps that have received the info?
Namjies: It's like even up to the last point, plenty of small step and suddenly... almost no orders
Namjies: Why are those aggregated bid/asks cutting so abruptly into flat-tops?
kakobrekla: 20:02.11 ( @JohnnyM ) kakobrekla: plug me into the matrix so you can download all this knowledge into my head lol
kakobrekla: i started to talk about bitcoin on forex irc network
mircea_popescu: live.coinbr.com << was this always so animated ?
Namjies: Well if I ever need to do something like that, I'll inquire about it.
mircea_popescu: i meant, exchange this 450k usd to ryals.
jurov: it *is* bad business practice.. let the customer wait a month?
Namjies: OR considering the fee they take on BTC transactions, they might not be interested to convert USD to CAD and get hit by conversion fees for someone withdrawing 100 CAD or so.
smickles: if that's the case, they need a better bank
Namjies: They might not allow you to have an account denomited in that currency however.
Namjies: They'll let you buy the currency, yes.
jurov: "beside the point" i mean they don't even mention bank wires or like
mircea_popescu: i bought ryals once just for the hell of it.
mircea_popescu: if i hail a cam i assume it has gas in the tank.
mircea_popescu: Namjies if you don't you have no business offering this service.
Namjies: That's assuming you have a single account at a single bank offering balances in all the currencies you want.
mircea_popescu: they claim to not have cad.
mircea_popescu: jurov : what do you mean besides the point ?
mircea_popescu: basically, that's a "we're broke" statement.
jurov: ofc, if they're in the same bank.. but that's beside the point for this situation
smickles: don't you just ask the bank to exchane it?
mircea_popescu: it's instant, you just move them from your own usd account to your own cad account.
mircea_popescu: you don't wire funds from your usd to your cad account.
jurov: and before all they plainly say "no funds" so i guess no wire transfer was even intended
Namjies: Yes, it would not take a month. It would still not be instant.
Namjies: BECAUSE they'd have to transfer from a USD account and wire funds to their CAD account...
jurov: Namjies, even if they had some administrative issues to move funds to CAD acct, it's not possible it would take a month
mircea_popescu: Namjies why are we discussing wires ? we're discussing exchanging usd to cad or w/e
Namjies: I've never seen instant processing of wire transfers.
mircea_popescu: now with cad, on the theory that "nobody cares about cad"
mircea_popescu: first by the entire dwolla bs, on the grounds that people know dwolla are assholla
mircea_popescu: and are trying to conserve cash as best they can
mircea_popescu: basically the only explanation i can see is that they are literally out of money
mircea_popescu: it takes me longer to authorise it than it takes the bank to execute it.
mircea_popescu: man seriously, it is five seconds, i just make the order.
jurov: Namijes, did you saw the ticket date there?
Namjies: Imagine I have a USD bank account and a CAD bank account. I have to transfer funds to one another and wait a few days for conversion & transfer to happen.
Namjies: It wouldn't take me 5 seconds.
mircea_popescu: do you know what it takes to pay back usd on an eur intake ?
smickles: you can buy usd, and they pair you with a cad seller, and run to their bank to get the usd