948500+ entries in 0.708s
jurov: and congrats on
the STAT.
jurov: mod6 i don't understand
the rss? you want
to show rss data here in chan?
mod6: does anyone have
the mpex-rss.php feed available via bot request?
jurov: did some
testing
txs... no assbot dice
mod6: ok back
to winning with assbot
jurov: tried simple buy order and works... but seems assbot is out of
the loop
jurov: comparing
to
the blog photo... seems
the left one
jurov: yea cherry
trucks and like
jurov: lol
there ya go pigeons.. even Matthew 21:12 mentions you
jurov: And Satoshi entered
the Blockchain and drove out all who sold and bought in
the Blockchain, and he overturned
the
tables of
the money-changers and
the seats of
those who sold pigeons.
mircea_popescu: ok, finally getting ready
to move
the mpex
trade engine
to its new home.
pigeons: satoshi or guest? satoshi used
tor
MJR_: it's funny
though, you see his chat logs pasted around like bible verses
MJR_: hmmm, wait he'd only need
to sign a message from
that address
MJR_: well
that is unless he spent
them all
kakobrekla: singing with
the coins for first block should do it
mircea_popescu: incidentally, how long
till satoshi comes back from
the heavens
to banish
the devil ? it could make nice paintings and all.
mircea_popescu: im not an investor at all, im just
the devil of bitcoin.
pigeons: i'm here all week,
tip your assbot
mircea_popescu: im not even sure what
the
thing is. i hate
these sites
that make you log in
MJR_: lol what is up with
the fan club
thing?
pigeons: i just decide what i'm willing
to pay for each fan club and offer
that
mircea_popescu: we're gonna end up with a degree in field psychology from watching btc
trading
mircea_popescu: hm, do you suppose he was like "o,
they're buying
their own shares" ?
mircea_popescu: and
they're not likely
to change it. we would have
to make our own irc server/equiv of freenode first
ThickAsThieves: i wonder how long it will be
til
that becomes a problem
kakobrekla: well,
the rate of posting would need
to be high
to justify it, but
then again
then its questionable if irc can handle
that
jurov: if
that's nasty non-mining-bond is so good, why no passthroughs
then?
jurov: kakobrekla, speaking about BF, did you come
to some conclusion with ukto about streaming
trades?
ThickAsThieves: i missed
this whole ognasty conversation, I must have him blocked from some other name
too (and ive only been here a couple mos or so)
mircea_popescu: kakobrekla i remember he had a god awful logo but upon suggestion fixed it. perhaps in
time
smickles: Sep 30 22:32:36 <mircea_popescu>
this glbse
thing you ask about is a blip.
mircea_popescu: Sep 30 22:32:36 <mircea_popescu>
this glbse
thing you ask about is a blip.
kakobrekla: well im not going
to
take
the
time
to look up nasty so FU
gribble: bastone was last seen in #bitcoin-assets 23 weeks, 6 days, 0 hours, 2 minutes, and 54 seconds ago: <Bastone> I'm not going
to
take
the
time
to look it up.
mircea_popescu: actually reviewing my logs,
this guy is on
the record logging in under a fake name but with his own ip
to "cast aspersions on my morality" or somesuch.
kakobrekla: 20:45.49 ( kakobrekla ) also im not even
thinking of listing someone who is not at least semi active in assets
pigeons: who knew securites law allows you
to circumvent by calling your operation a fan club
mircea_popescu: <OgNasty> I'd say more stats and
transparency
than ANY OTHER asset. << now you're just being an ass.
mircea_popescu: <Chaang-Noi> but
that is a maybe << avalon is doing about as well, ain't it ?
mircea_popescu: <OgNasty> I have enough experience with publicly
traded assets
to know
that it's all BS and
the exchanges will fold just like GLBSE when pressure gets put on
them. <<
kakobrekla: cause
the lame-o-meter reads
too high.
pigeons: ognasty would like his fan club
trades
to be streamed
to
this channel
Anduck: what weere ognasty
talking about
OgNasty: Hopefully next
time our market value will be in
the millions. ;) Happy St. Paddy's Day
tomorrow. Stay safe.
OgNasty: With
that being said, until
the next
time I grace
this channel
to again question
the validity of not listing
the 3rd most popular asset. :)
pigeons: yes i see mining operation would be more accurate
than mining bond
OgNasty: If we were
to be looked at as a mining bond,
then an accurate claim might be
that we're a mining bond which will increase from 1mh/s
to 42mh/s over
the coming 6 months. ;) So if difficulty jumps by 40x and BTC price falls, it would be a bad bond
to buy (but it isn't a bond, it's an operation).
pigeons: alright.
thanks for
the information
OgNasty: well,
then wait and see what we have in store next and maybe it will be more interesting and you'll become a fan.
pigeons: its not interesting cause i
thought its a mining bond. you
tell me its not a mining bond but you wont
tell me what it is. it has nothing
to do with
that you
think legal issues go away ...cause fanclub
OgNasty: Don't act like my asset is "stupid" and "not interesting" because I'm prepared for
the "when" while everyone else is
thinking about
the "if"
OgNasty: I have enough experience with publicly
traded assets
to know
that it's all BS and
the exchanges will fold just like GLBSE when pressure gets put on
them.
OgNasty: these bitcoin assets are in fantasyland with
their naming conventions...
OgNasty: smarter people
than you or I are behind
the writing and
there are reasons for it.
pigeons: no maybe you should re-write it
though
OgNasty: Should I post
that link a 4th
time? lol
OgNasty: Again, all on
the OP of my
thread.
pigeons: do you have a channel you stream
them
to so people don't have
to register for
the fan club?
OgNasty: it is more interesting
than 90% of
the stuff listed by assbot.