93300+ entries in 0.789s

a111: Logged on 2016-02-18 22:21 gabriel_laddel:
I have a few obligations to take care of here in the US first.
a111: Logged on 2016-07-02 13:58 mircea_popescu: the train example is very much illustrative. there is no purpose to trains! trains exist because of the following conversation : "hey, this steam engine is pretty neat, but is it always stationary ?" "
i guess you could add a rail to it..." "hmmmm".
mircea_popescu: and speaking of jennifers :
i can report partial data on a multi-year research project. of the "internet demographic" (under 30, poor, intelligent, educated, ambitious - the sort that supplies the seo experts, hackers, camwhores etc), 93% (of 2274) males and 2% (of 741) females actually heard of bitcoin.
mircea_popescu: and in this context there exists a correctness, "what do we make the rail out of ?" "well, minimum mass of functional steam engine is 1 ton, so
i guess something rigid enough ; but also can't be friable must be ductile.
mircea_popescu: the train example is very much illustrative. there is no purpose to trains! trains exist because of the following conversation : "hey, this steam engine is pretty neat, but is it always stationary ?" "
i guess you could add a rail to it..." "hmmmm".
☟︎ mircea_popescu:
i'm not required to show you a 1980s mercedes sedan in 1882 to explain why the fuck cars are a thing.
mircea_popescu: dude.
i gave you an example of cars and horses to explain how TECHNOLOGY IS REPLACED FROM THE BOTTOM OF THE FRUIT TREE UP
mircea_popescu: and while
i have no doubt seti@home are imbeciles, nevertheless the problem is well solved. voting etc.
mircea_popescu: take the obvious example : the reddit thing. can
i do it on n boxes, indiferently ?
mircea_popescu: code is not things, which is why whether
i;d download a car or not has no fucking bearing on that discussion.
mircea_popescu:
i don't care what comes out of it. just as long as the process is correct, come what may will be fine.
mircea_popescu:
i get it, you've lived a life dealing with people who want a certain thing to come out of babbage's machine. fine.
mircea_popescu:
i'm not about to import usg.retardation for any reason.
mircea_popescu: actually,
i don't think our scheme necessarily allows to know WHICH it was even if you confiscate them all.
mircea_popescu: "
i fuck my wife every morn and every evening, she's not yet run out of cunt". what if she had ?!
mircea_popescu: asciilifeform understand the problem with the pretense : sword cuts both ways, before you know it,
i'm using it to cut their heads.
mircea_popescu: that
i have the option to fuck any woman in town does in no conceivable way reduce to me being married to every woman that ever lived.
mircea_popescu: here,
i don't know this to be the case, moreover
i suspect otherwise.
mircea_popescu:
i am in general more than happy to go into "don't interrupt - mistake" mode, whenever
i know this to be the case.
mircea_popescu: there's no point in the sense of "this is what we're trying to accomplish". there's a few drivers ; and logically some likely outcomes. should
i enumerate ?
mircea_popescu:
i dunno how to extract a sentence out of your last two lines.
phf: so
i'm just trying to understand better the original objections
phf: asciilifeform: you're more attached to dismissing symmetric, then
i am to preserving it
mircea_popescu: you want contact to my uci interface, we agree in advance, and
i whitelist your key.
phf: a symmetric-key algorithm is my point, say aes, since
i don't know any better
mircea_popescu:
i'm not saying that we are, but WHY NOT must be stated, and in such a way 107 iq guy in 2049 reading this understands exactly wtf.
ben_vulpes:
i imagined that each installed worker process would listen for orders from only one key, which'd handle billing.
mircea_popescu: no
i know, it's not on you ; just, the matter has to be discuss't.
mircea_popescu: anyway. uci is not gossipd. there is a good reason to implement gossipd OVER uci, but on the uci layer the thing shouldn't be concerned with this kind of security
i don't thinl
mircea_popescu: asciilifeform the tor model is, other than its many implementation warts, fundamentally broken
i think.
mircea_popescu: asciilifeform
i'm thinking a "independent nodes" sort of botnet, as opposed to the zombie windowze thing usually run
ben_vulpes:
i don't have a good enough model to propse anything yet, hence the questions
mircea_popescu: ben_vulpes
i would expect there'd have to be a management language for this.
BingoBoingo:
I dunno
I'm thinking about a "weather" category nao
shinohai: It's mpex
I believe, 404 here.
a111: Logged on 2016-07-01 18:48 hanbot: asciilifeform didja learn their variety speak? or figure it's a fluke (
i thought theory was wrong demo)?
mircea_popescu: it's always a little disappointing when
i hit the last lines of the logs ;/
mircea_popescu: so
i posit to you that your problem is not even slightly a matter of "wrong knife", along the lines of, "if only
i had hyfdrofluoric acid - could melt glass", but more of low energy. you wish to amass moar power not more knowledge, to dent teh pot.
jurov:
i dun see how spectroscope helps with "it-must-be-called-pyrex"
jurov: so
I think it's just some UStards latched on "pyrex" and are rightly milked by brand owner
jurov: it's widely used here and
I never heard it failed because of cold/heat
jurov:
i did not do them yet
jurov:
i did break some, but always mechanically, never by heat/cold cycle
trinque:
I guess now if you went in it'd read "from his pair of shoes he was trying to sell"
mircea_popescu: if
i were a younger, innocent verision of myself, like the quoted alf has the unspeakable advantage of being,
i'd disbelieve this story.
a111: Logged on 2016-06-22 16:02 ascii_deadfiber:
i expect a shift of resources back to the 'corrode bitcoin' stratagem, vs the 'pump shitcoin'
hanbot: asciilifeform didja learn their variety speak? or figure it's a fluke (
i thought theory was wrong demo)?
☟︎ trinque: ey ben_vulpes, can
I get you to crank that knob in nginx sometime today?
shinohai: asciilifeform
I suppose to not have equipment send flying shards of glass and nasty chemiclas all into face
gabriel_laddel:
I for one would like to be able to buy pyrex, and not the re-branded crap either.