85800+ entries in 0.709s

jurov: on second thought ... oops
i inadvertently supported my point by leaking s3cr3t trilema email :( feel free to censor it
mircea_popescu: ben_vulpes
i'm not using a rss-tron anymore ; bots ruined me for it.
jurov:
i found whole discussion too funny, had to throw some 2c in on trilema
trinque:
I can just throw it in the RSS list
mircea_popescu: "kyle go clean your room this instant!" "sorry mom,
i...
i...
i malloc'd my hands and
i think there were some double free's in there or something!"
mircea_popescu: did
i drop the "prionic" alt-explanation in log or no ?
i... can't recall ?
ben_vulpes:
i did eventually run the citation down, 'twas some less than thirty old men with beginning signs of alzheimers who realized they all had vasectomies
ben_vulpes: heh
i actually remember when it was! 'diamond age' has a great gag where the poors with shitty ocular implants have to suffer viral ads all day and go insane
ben_vulpes: jurov: myeah
i gave up on the cyberpunk dream of technology in my body a loooong time ago.
mircea_popescu: from what
i've seen, the porous stuff and the porous stuff only clogs.
mircea_popescu: btw jurov mind protesting the heteronormative pronz a little bit,
i need something to counterbalance alf!
trinque: mircea_popescu: hey that has a handle you can pull, or so
I gather
mircea_popescu: hopefully b v gets daughters, they get to be 16, call weekly "dad...
i'm in jail... because
i'm pregnant..."
ben_vulpes:
i wonder if you can get a bulk discount for getting your kids out of us.jail?
mircea_popescu: (there was a cold snap, and that place drew just about 19 amps consistently for days,
i'm pretty sure)
mircea_popescu: asciilifeform
i had them replaced them with sane items, so they cut power, yes.
mod6:
i don't know for sure. maybe "hand full of blackcats" or something. small firecrackers.
Framedragger: " 'how long node a and b have been in communion'" - right, that
i can understand, that it's not good
Framedragger: asciilifeform: tho am not sure if it's necessarily bad, to leak incremental nonces.
i mean,
i know you don't want to leak one single useful bit to da enemy;
i don't know if it's a practical constraint, even if it is laudible.
Framedragger: actually, nm. if you don't want to leak incremental info of this kind,
i guess it does become more difficult
mod6:
i apparently need to read your blog more, at least, on the specifics of lisp-cpu via verilog & fpga
mod6:
i'll have to reread all of this stuff;
i have difficulty with a mental model of this. but
i do follow the detail points.
mod6:
i better reread all of this stuff :/
mod6: right.
i think this whole topic is totally over my head these days.
mod6: and
i suppose this makes it easier to swap out the station key and retain the royal key.
a111: Logged on 2016-09-09 14:51 mod6: <+asciilifeform> mod6: the correct pill is to decouple (at least from enemy's pov) gossip station keys from royal keys. << so to clairify this a bit, at least for myself, the gossipd node that
I run and operate would verify transmissions sent to it with mod6-battlestation-key, but when
I would actually go to send something out it would sign with mod6 "royal" or "personal" key?
mod6: more than anything,
i just want to be able to contribue a bit better to these gossipd discussions - which will be a vital part of the infrastructure.
mod6:
i'd have to dig it up, but
i thought there was a trilema that outlined the 'spec' back a while ago.
shinohai:
I take it your female java shadow isn't there?
mod6: but, maybe the first step, to recognize Framedragger, is to update the spec. there has been much discussion about this, and maybe
I'm having a hard time keeping all of the details in my head.
mod6:
i don't want to disagree with what
I just said here: <+mod6> a lot of new questions and discussions will arise once someone starts to prototype gossipd out.
mod6: <+asciilifeform> mod6: the correct pill is to decouple (at least from enemy's pov) gossip station keys from royal keys. << so to clairify this a bit, at least for myself, the gossipd node that
I run and operate would verify transmissions sent to it with mod6-battlestation-key, but when
I would actually go to send something out it would sign with mod6 "royal" or "personal" key?
☟︎ mod6:
i need more coffee.
shinohai:
I agree with trinque tho that V has a place in /usr/bin/local of the future
mod6: yeah, forgot about that. anyway,
i appreciate interesting ideas.
mod6: and mine can be used, 100% in the same way. im not even sure that
i fully agree that mine should do what it does. you and
I both, seperately have wrestled with this thought.
PeterL:
I feel like BingoBoingo has not posted anything in a while ...
mircea_popescu: though
i suppose it should be a bunch of tiny azn dicks rather than one big one... hm...
mircea_popescu: how is it my kink ?
i'm not the one living on the planet without copper deposits!
thestringpuller: Framedragger: just use apple's bluetooth earwaxphones << Glad
I'm not the only one who discovered despite who clean
I try to keep the headphones. Earwax gunks up into the metal screens and inevitably fucks up the sound.
Framedragger: asciilifeform: that's what
i'm worried about, you may have to burn IP, too. and
i'm all up for mesh networks and post nuclear radio, but kinda sucks that the whole internet backbone may be incompatible with proper gossipd, gotta admit.
Framedragger: true that. goes the extra way to fuck women, metamorphosis and all, so
i'll give him that tho
Framedragger: and gossipd without any auth whatsoever wouldn't really be that? in all honesty,
i should reread the spec, which is probably outdated, and log search sucks, fml
mircea_popescu:
i dunno when or why the prevailing notion of "software" and "technology", at least in english and its dominions, became "it is for to make ordinary people (ie, rank imbeciles) like gods!"
Framedragger: besides, they'd get confused themselves, what with deliberately no message authenticity; and we shall have a good time. am
i stretching here?
Framedragger: mircea_popescu: how about
i (an nsa employee, say) just make a filter which grabs all observed gossipd traffic (packet timing or w/e, and if it's an actually new transmission protocol, then supreme joy is me) and send it for further analysis.
i shall assume that while it's not certain which messages are legit and which are not, the offending t3rr0rist group is too lazy to transmit proper false positives to provide noise,
Framedragger: yes this is lulzy and a disservice and
i agree the reputation is not insanely great.., so to speak.
Framedragger: maybe. and
i agree that without prototype difficult to talk of this anyway
Framedragger: (
i am aware that proper gossipd doesn't have to run over internet)
mircea_popescu: in short,
i oppose the socially destructuring, anti elitist and equalitarian nature of signatures.
mircea_popescu: it's not that
i'm against signatures or anything of the sort. it's just that
i understand their domain. an item is signed when the auctorial intention is "for this to stand now and forever to any and all who may come".
Framedragger: semi-orthogonal (but not too orthogonal): ditching the conceptual level for a second and thinking about mundane reality, would a new transport layer even *work* given current internet infrastructure? there are problems with ICMP traffic on some ISPs (sure, ISPs should die anyway, and esp. those
i hear you say.) this can be tested to some extent, hm.
Framedragger: then the argument does admittedly slide a little: yes okay, this is great that it can't be DoS'd that easily when the time comes; and yet it still has to parse multiple packets before it determines that hey,
i don't know this fingerprint.