83000+ entries in 0.696s

trinque: mircea
_popescu: heh I don't mind; am merely setting expectations
mod6: <+mircea
_popescu> now, can we has static etc 32 bit ? << yeah. we'll put that at the top of the list.
mircea_popescu: so basically, you put archlinux according to ascii
_field's brew on the pogo, and then compiled a static foundation bitcoind and loaded that up, and that's what we have now ?
ascii_field: mircea
_popescu: adding a problem++ to the list at the cost of a weekend is not on this list << astute observation, which is why my patch was specifically labeled as a proof to nail down the locus of the problem, and not an item to be used on the battlefield.
mircea_popescu: ascii
_field the way system engineering is done, is either do not fix a problem, or else fix the problem. adding a problem++ to the list at the cost of a weekend is not on this list.
ascii_field: mod6, mircea
_popescu: depending on what it means to fix the leak (total replacement for block sync mechanism and a mathematical proof for it? or something more like my patch ?) it could take anywhere from a weekend to maxint days
ascii_field: mircea
_popescu: one of these things is not like the other, i think
mircea_popescu: ascii
_field you familiar with how long current foundation patch took ?
mircea_popescu: apparently ascii
_field wants a provably-correct stack of five layers of software before we ship out ten dollar items.
mircea_popescu: ben
_vulpes mod6 what do you two figure is a realistic timeline for "bitcoind version that doesn't allocate memory without checks and so doesn't crash in THAT particular way" ?
mircea_popescu: <ascii
_field> (a passing draft will drop your channel capacity to nothing ?) << BUT DRM IN AUDIO WORKS!!!
ascii_field: mircea
_popescu: if you ask me, releasing the memleak version is lunacy
nubbins`: ascii
_field that's what i'm wondering :0
mircea_popescu: ascii
_field but the 4gb is only because they run crud.
nubbins`: ascii
_field i thought it was a raspi between two sheets of acrylic at first
thestringpuller: ascii
_field: snore for now, but if they start selling, they lower barrier to fork.
mats: ascii
_field: i think so. i believe the tip is transparent like the 'Sidewinder'
mats: ascii
_field: iirc bezzle rate for live rounds are 70k+
assbot: Logged on 24-03-2015 09:25:50; mircea
_popescu: cazalla you know how to set that shit up tho ?
mats: ascii
_field: nah. acquaintance's.
BingoBoingo: ;;later tell mircea
_popescu es.qntra sounds cool Seperate wordpress install for it does seem necessary
trinque: ascii
_field: makes sense though that they would treat these like fire-once weapons
trinque: ascii
_field: hm, I took the hard drive firmware situation to mean malware could hide and resurface without being detectable at the OS level
trinque: funkenstein
_: you can moralize about any step in the supply chain of the thing
trinque: funkenstein
_: openbsd doesn't come from an app store
trinque: funkenstein
_: ascii
_field may give you a beating if you claim you have full control over your software stack
mats: ascii
_field: ha, no. a finalist from this year
trinque: funkenstein
_: there's nothing wrong with paying for software
nubbins`: funkenstein
_ are we even speaking the same language here?
nubbins`: funkenstein
_ that said, if you know of a way i can turn my phone into a full-featured GPS unit for eight dollars, feel free to let me know
nubbins`: funkenstein
_ problem is, i can't get much of a GPS app written for $8.
danielpbarron: funkenstein
_> i refuse to admit that any creature would pay for an app << I've paid for a few
trinque: funkenstein
_: weird way of saying warez? or do you only use open source?
nubbins`: funkenstein
_ try asking a different way?
nubbins`: funkenstein
_ i paid eight or so bucks for a GPS app, 10/10 would do again
nubbins`: ascii
_field not unlike bitcoin, early "adopters" of writing ios apps scooped up most of the "free money"
chetty: ascii
_field, most likely no real knowledge of the gold rush
ascii_field: pete
_dushenski: what, precisely, was it that you wanted from the jamaicans ?
pete_dushenski: Pierre
_Rochard: keep nubbins`occupied while i'm gone, wouldja ?
nubbins`: <+pete
_dushenski> in that case, why bother doing better than fly guts kid ? <<< same reason one might bother to do worse: different tolerance for comforts or lack thereof
nubbins`: pete
_dushenski understand that you're a wallet with an afro when you visit resorts
nubbins`: pete
_dushenski it's not effective --against you-- but it's *precisely effective* against the average vacationer.
thestringpuller: pete
_dushenski: well it's in art in the sense of the Oracle from the Matrix. Once you realize there is a lot of "waiting" for events to occur, then it's best to spend the meanwhile in enjoyment.
nubbins`: pete
_dushenski minimum wage in jamaica is $1.25/hr.
thestringpuller: i'm an expert time waster, and wasting time is an art pete
_dushenski
pete_dushenski: mats seems to be pushing his dual
_ec point a bit. i'm... skeptical.
mats: what i'm saying is that, as the evidence stands, i'm unable to take a firmer position on Dual
_EC than the previously accepted consensus that the weakness being a backdoor is quite unlikely, and that Dual
_EC should be shunned only because of the abundance of caution with regard to any issues that is endemic to the crypto field
mats: that this happened at the same time as the push towards DUAL
_EC as default looks incidental, not malicious
mats: look, i'm putting my skepticism on the record. if there was evidence, it'd look like 'Tor Stinks' or the slides from Der Spiegel's work on the Belgacom pwnage. i'm not saying that Dual
_EC
_DRBG doesn't have obvious flaws or that anyone should continue using it, but my skepticism regarding it being an intentional backdoor remains
mats: for the record, there is still absolutely zero solid evidence that Dual
_EC
_DRBG is backdoored. the Snowden leaks never mention it by name, never talk about backdooring a CSPRNG, and indeed never talk about backdooring anything. the extent of what they mention is that NSA wanted to 'influence standards'
mats: i'm not convinced dual
_ec
_drbg is rigged
nubbins`: a small amount of "can afford to lose, why not try btc" in 2012 provides the opportunity for "can afford to lose, why not try
___" in 2015
nubbins`: so without having the ability to check, i'd advance that SO
_NOSIGPIPE might be an osx-specific fix
nubbins`: random forum quote: "In linux sockets (BSD 4.4 compliant) there something called MSG
_NOSIGNAL"
nubbins`: replace MSG
_NOSIGNAL flag with SO
_NOSIGPIPE
nubbins`: sum total of changes: modify SSL
_ARCH
_TYPE to Darwin64-x86
_64-cc
nubbins`: (example: sed 's/MSG
_NOSIGNAL/SO
_NOSIGPIPE/' on two files is approx. half the work)