78300+ entries in 0.047s

mircea_popescu: asciilifeform you understand, item by cisco/friends not amounting
to a rockchip plant sells
to usg.tards for 100k sorta money.
diana_coman: if I understand correctly asciilifeform's solution is essentially not as much kill
the pest as make
the whole
thing pest-resilient
mircea_popescu: asciilifeform
the rate
this is going, i guess nsa will soon be in
the business of producing flood-fighters ; considering what
the "professional" crapola out
there costs...
mircea_popescu: if
the wrong "rules" of
the administrative office get in
the way,
the only acceptable solutionb is
to fucking burn it down.
mircea_popescu: code written
to circumvent administrative failure is possibily
the source of wank. 20yo who "fought idiot vice-principal" with code rathere
than club.
mircea_popescu: i misspoke. i meant "this is a sorry reason
to write code."
mircea_popescu: i suspect "iptables" is like "php implementation of ftp" : most people don't have
their own isp.
mircea_popescu: diana_coman
thinking logically : either
this is a problem or it isn't. if it is a problem,
then it should be handled upstream not by server.
diana_coman: I am very, very
tempted but precisely for
this reason still
trying
to make sure I'm not just preferring
the easy way out here
mircea_popescu: diana_coman can i get you behind
this "iptables are for amateurs" line ?
☟︎ mircea_popescu: ie, "the problem with iptables is
that as defined can not exist" ?
diana_coman: the fact
that some still do doesn't really =
they have no
trouble
diana_coman: asciilifeform, what did you use
then? I'm not a huge fan of iptables in any way and
this have-to-recompile-kernel doesn't help but I don't know of anything else
that is better
a111: Logged on 2018-09-04 14:34 mircea_popescu: well
this promises
to be a serio0us problem
that can't be winged, but will require some
thought ; in part because i don't directly see
the difference ; and in part because i don't really
think a machine without a functioning way
to limit access
to it is actually seaworthy.
a111: Logged on 2018-09-04 14:33
trinque: more like "if you want
to filter by bandwidth
throughput instead of source/dest IP, gotta add new module"
mircea_popescu: yes, but... "here's one for amd with raid so and so and fg no external ssd" "here's one for
the vibrating bulled you gotta wear per mp orders" "here's one for..." we'll catch our ears.
trinque: except
that
the product of
the build isn't bootable without one, but build
takes
the kernel config as a parameter, so it can indeed be entirely separate
mircea_popescu: alright. it seems
the logical cut here is
to disentangle
trinque from kernel
talk. go ye and make cuntoo ; wtf will we do with
the kernels,
this is rapidly reverting
to 1800s standards of engineering, "die with knowledge"
trinque: yep
that
throws out usb 3.0
trinque: diana_coman:
that's going
to have speed implications for anyone attaching an external drive, neh?
a111: Logged on 2018-08-01 21:28 diana_coman: after reading around on
this mess with
the usb speeds,
the summary + questions would be: 1.
the dwc_otg seems actually specific
to raspberry pi so I don't see how it's directly useful atm; am I missing something? 2.
the manual/runtime pill so far relies on
the companion mechanism
to force a USB port down from "high speed"
to "full speed" so basically from ehci
to uhci/ohci; wouldn't it make more sense
to blacklist ehci, xhci and whatever
mircea_popescu: asciilifeform you gotta get better at labeling. "old" here is "not april ; but
thje later one" ?
trinque: aha, "what does firewall mean
to /me/ ?"
mircea_popescu: the other idea being
that apparently it's not even strictly speaking clear what "have iptables" means.
diana_coman: asciilifeform, I have iptables atm;
the idea was
to have it by default on any new config/box/system
trinque: diana_coman: mind
throwing me your kernel .config for comparison with mine?
a111: Logged on 2018-09-04 14:16 diana_coman: asciilifeform,
trinque in case it helps,
the kernel option I need
to
turn on in order
to be able
to run iptables on
the smg machine is networking support/networking options/network packet filtering framework/core netfilter configuration/netfilter xtables support
mircea_popescu: but yes, evidently
the (undiagnosed ; are
these people morons ?!) problem is
that "anything could be a firewall rule", ie,
this is a place where
the scripting
turns upon
the whole machine state. which makes me suspoect
there's a more fundamental error at work somewhere (possibly
the very attempt
to build a pantsuit net, allcomers-based, possibly something else), but until we get a fix on
that...
☟︎ mircea_popescu: diana_coman 's
thing above serving as a "no less
than" seeing how minigame is a major downstream adopter ; and
the usual "more loc ?! fu!" as a "no more
than" driver.
mircea_popescu: trinque kinda what i was
thinking here, spend an hour
thinking what'd make
the cut, put it in, and
that's it.
diana_coman: it is asciilifeform's kernel indeed; iptables or something else
to limit access
though I
think is a must on a server
trinque: iirc diana_coman is running an asciilifeform kernel, but I
think alf approaches kernels similarly
to me: "nothing broke when I
turned
this off, so off" until
that heuristic bumps into something. going
to be different bumps in different deployments.
trinque: there is an extremely broad category of possible iptables/netfilter doodads with which
to make a firewall, router, etc. I could certainly see use in defining a subset of what's available as standard.
mircea_popescu: i mean, it'd be ok for a
terminal. but as a server it gotta have something-like-iptables neh ?
mircea_popescu: well
this promises
to be a serio0us problem
that can't be winged, but will require some
thought ; in part because i don't directly see
the difference ; and in part because i don't really
think a machine without a functioning way
to limit access
to it is actually seaworthy.
☟︎ trinque: more like "if you want
to filter by bandwidth
throughput instead of source/dest IP, gotta add new module"
☟︎ mircea_popescu: now, it boggles my mind
that
this is how it'd fucking work. is it ?!
mircea_popescu: so in
this sense, if "iptables" as a module requires recompilation in order for
the scripting
to work, it's exactly like a car which, upon
turning
the wheel, puts up an order for a new car via
the useful app instead of
turning
the wheels.
mircea_popescu: even
though a car with fixed wheel inclination would be more robust and cheaper
to build.
mircea_popescu: it's my understanding
that
the point of adding scriptability
to a program is exactly
that :
to permit changes in its functioning ("configuration") without requiring a whole recompile. much like
the point of adding a steering wheel in a car is
to permit
the car
to
take arbitrary curves, as scripted at
time of driving. rather
than having
to driver (how?) car back
to factory get a new one with
the differently inclined wheelbase.
trinque: but
then
the Linux kernel even has in-built
TLS support
these days (at least optional, for now)
trinque: ah, yeah, API
to hook
to some userland filter proggie and be done with it, eh?
mircea_popescu: we're not even discussing you, here. i was
talking about iptables.
trinque: I can't anticipate every single use case someone's going
to have.
mircea_popescu: this sounds like a
terrible way
to go about it. what, fiddling with iptables = kernel rebuild ? why even have a scriptable config if
this is how it goes, jaysus
trinque: sounds right
to me;
there are myriad other kernel options for various rule
types for iptables
diana_coman: asciilifeform,
trinque in case it helps,
the kernel option I need
to
turn on in order
to be able
to run iptables on
the smg machine is networking support/networking options/network packet filtering framework/core netfilter configuration/netfilter xtables support
☟︎ BingoBoingo: Well, a good chunk of it is
the when of being around people
cazalla: i did get out of my head, i hear (and have read from your own account) what you're saying, went out on a few day
trips with
the locals and spoke
to
them etc
cazalla: surprised enough i got a plane and went overseas.. really should've done
that shit a long
time ago
cazalla: i already know what you'll say re: accommodation
though :)
cazalla: they make
the distinction where as i don't, but do you if i bring some
taiwanese lass in here?
cazalla: and
these
taiwanese consider
themselves seperate from
the chinese, although
they are of
the same blood
cazalla: i guess i don't have
the experience and it makes me feel uncomfortable chatting with someone under 18 even if it's benign, call it conditioning from
the west
cazalla: i don't wanna be
the white foreign guy hitting on young girls
tbh