log☇︎
738300+ entries in 0.522s
mike_c: omg. the log is remapping pathways in my brain. it's making me dyslexic.
mircea_popescu: what i dislike is a bunch of fucktards going around with money that isn't theirs, muddying things up.
MisterE: this topic comes up regularly in #space
MisterE: nothing other than being a space enthusiast
mircea_popescu: nothing really, all the overfed know of hunger is their terror.
mircea_popescu: so you think.
MisterE: hunger inspires looking for food, not looking toward the stars heh
mircea_popescu: but they're as false today as they were in 1700.
mircea_popescu: not that people can't rehash the ancient arguments re the importance of the church and present them de novo in favour of the state.
MisterE: the other thing about the 'intangible benefits' of research and exploration is that it inspires and this is so very much lacking in todays youth. When we were walking on the moon people were amazed and wanted to be engineers, nothing like that now. The biggest value to come out of the Apollo project was the increased interest in science.
mircea_popescu: the state is everywhere and all the time a drawback.
antephialtic: mircea_popescu: not the welfare state, but the state, certainly
mircea_popescu: antephialtic if you think the welfare state did anything for the advancement of pure mathematics...
MisterE: you need a state with a surplus to do that too
asciilifeform: ific Bondo, sanded to perfection and painted with meticulous care.'
asciilifeform: 'The basic problem is that the robber-barons of Silicon Valley, unlike their Victorian forebears, do not realize that, if they want all this science, they will actually have to pay for it - themselves. Instead, they look at their tax forms and think: I gave at the office. But they didn't. They gave to scientocracy. Now, they need to figure out how to patronize science - or there will be no science. Just scient ☟︎
asciilifeform: mr. mold had a good tidbit on this:
MisterE: I wish when government funded that kind of research the first priority was not always to weaponize it if possible
antephialtic: hard to see how such pursuits would be funded without a system of universities (and thereby the state that funds it)
antephialtic: regardless of your thoughts on welfare, with regards to science their are many avenues of basic research that cannot be justified from a pure ROI standpoint yet have long term benefits to technological advancement. Such as the development of pure mathematics, etcetra
asciilifeform: just about every interesting technology attributed to a mega-organization was done on 'stolen time.'
mircea_popescu: ahahaha diablo 3 apparently still thinks it exists, made update, costs 40 bux
MisterE: those grades are the most vluable though
MisterE: well the were nice but are fallig apart now
asciilifeform: it seems odd, to say the least, to lump together projects done on embezzled government coin, and ones planned/ordered by bureaucrats.
MisterE: Like lawyers and consultants they thrive on problems not on solving them heh
antephialtic: well, inventing the ARPAnet was one kind of cool thing
MisterE: when was the last time a government "fixed" anything?
antephialtic: t'll lead to a future consolidation of wealth, extremely low levels of social mobility and weak economic performance compared to countries that use a more mixed method. From a competition viewpoint this is not a good position."
antephialtic: his thoughts: "Now, whilst some might welcome the reduction in the state caused by a loss of taxation, the state is THE key economic driver of innovation, prosperity and social mobility. The laissez faire economic system is an extreme mindset of some of the more ardent supporters of Freidmanism and the Chicago School. There is no basis for assuming a beneficial society can be created without the state and in all likelihood i
antephialtic: his recipe for how the government could "fix" bitcoin
antephialtic: I'm sure this will be quite entertaining to you as well: http://blog.gardeviance.org/2014/03/how-to-fix-bitcoin.html
antephialtic: will be interested to see you two fight it out on twitter. his opinions (on politics at least) seem to be the polar opposite of yours
antephialtic: mircea_popescu: the first post was quite good
ozbot: The politics of Bitcoin pe Trilema - Un blog de Mircea Popescu.
mircea_popescu: http://trilema.com/2012/the-politics-of-bitcoin/ that too i guess
ozbot: Bitcoin and the poor pe Trilema - Un blog de Mircea Popescu.
mircea_popescu: http://trilema.com/2012/bitcoin-and-the-poor/ < now you can read 2012 trilema antephialtic :p
pankkake: antephialtic: that's why I said last two paragraphs ;)
antephialtic: pankakke: the solution to fixing bitcoin is not to make it more complex. that just increases the inertia of having multiple compatible implementations
antephialtic: mp: talk to him on twitter, he's pretty active
asciilifeform: i'm genuinely curious if any of the 'alt workfunction' folks are going for something other than 'equality!11'
mircea_popescu: idiot b;logger.com. was gonna leave the guy a reply, but a well.
antephialtic: pankkake: I think that is wishful thinking
antephialtic: mp: I wasn't reasing trilema in 2012 :)
mircea_popescu: this is what, trilema cca 2012.
mircea_popescu: "Austerity measures will have taken the route of unprecedented and radical decimation of the state - everything from state provided healthcare to coastguards to income support to education will be practically gone replaced with numerous forms of bitcoin based insurance."
pankkake: by the way: http://blog.oleganza.com/post/79783931404/idea-of-a-useful-altcoin (last two paragraphs)
pankkake: yeah, I've seen that in people praising Bernankoin without getting it
asciilifeform: if you're willing to sign under 'i wish victory to botnet artists but not semiconductor makers', you can work with that.
mircea_popescu: pankkake not altcoins, but teh people bitching about how other people are eating "their" share of the pie are.
antephialtic: even if he doesn't like the outcome
mircea_popescu: it's pure jealousy, and well... that's not part of the laws of nature.
antephialtic: and to that I say, that's just how the world works
mircea_popescu: antephialtic but the whole argument behind scrypt,. and behind asic-resistence, and all that jazz is "other people than us have better resources and are being rewarded for this."
antephialtic: but I think that is inevitable, and if it is going to happen, I'd rather end up at the top instead of getting crushed in the transition
antephialtic: I don't think cryptocoins will make the world any more egalitarian. Probably less so, as their widespread use would deny the state a lot of tax revenue
asciilifeform: there's possible merit to the experiment if you have a specific enemy in mind, who Must Die (tm), rather than some foggy notion of 'equality'
mircea_popescu: cryptocoins are here to bring inequality back to its proper size
mircea_popescu: there is the problem. it's all trying to somehow build equality out of technology.
asciilifeform: and the lamers aren't going to like who that turns out to be
asciilifeform: the problem with any such experiment is that, ultimately, 'the race is to the swift.'
antephialtic: sorry for the PDF
asciilifeform: no thanks
antephialtic: hah. If you want to require disk, you can do proof-of-storage instead of PoW
asciilifeform: antephialtic: correct. and, if you're clever, you can have difficulty ramp up to outpace any conceivable growth in vlsi density.
antephialtic: asciilifeform: what are the characteristics of a cellular automaton PoW that make it resistant to an ASIC implementation?
mircea_popescu: asciilifeform give them a decade. reading these logs is slow work.
mircea_popescu: antephialtic in the case of the litecoin fork, yes.
mircea_popescu: We have not come across a proof of work algorithm that is truly ASIC-proof and quick to verify. All alternatives will only delay the problem, and at a considerable cost.
mircea_popescu: Here’s are the reasons:
antephialtic: also, the chain with the asics will have much better network security than the new X11 chain, so many rational merchants would stay
mircea_popescu: when people go to war, they couldn't care less about foreign markets or whatever the fuck.
antephialtic: yes, but bad for everyone if less merchants accept it because they lose trust in the tech
mircea_popescu: since the fork will NEVER resolve, tyhere's no scamming.
mircea_popescu: or the new chain coins they chose.
mircea_popescu: a hard fork is a political event. they get the old chain coins they chose.
antephialtic: while double spending on the new chain
antephialtic: mircea_popescu: you send them coins while they are still on the old chain
asciilifeform: if one is to do something, even something foolish, it ought to be done right. cellular automaton proof-of-work.
mircea_popescu: antephialtic how exactly would the merchants be scammed ?
mircea_popescu: "bitcoin is here to solve my own problems!!1"
mircea_popescu: then again theres that consideration.
mircea_popescu: Wtf is the point of crypto if a bank can simply mine all the coins themselves, the entire point of crypto was to get away from elitist bankers
mircea_popescu: And it would be a great way to stick it to the mega banker elite class who invested billions in Asic hardware.
mircea_popescu: Hardforking BTC and LTC to X11 would be pretty awesome.
antephialtic: would be very damaging to trust unless it was done extremely carefully
antephialtic: but with bitcoin it would be a lot more dangerous as many merchants would get scammed while their were still multiple viable forks
antephialtic: dogecoin has intentionally forked at least once to switch the block reward algo
antephialtic: I think forking the chain is interesting, would give a lot of incentive for miners and users to switch if the tech was actually better
pankkake: of the code, not of the chain
asciilifeform: i thought every alt was a 'hostile fork' ?
mircea_popescu: old news tho neh ?
pankkake: interesting experiment though - how could a hostile hardfork be received in bitcoin
mircea_popescu: there's a deep understanding of what humanity is all about, that someone as fucking weird as dostoievski could exhibit nevertheless
asciilifeform: rms is a special case. he used to be a fairly sociable creature before his motherland was burned to the ground.
mircea_popescu: well senility aside, there's more to it than that.
antephialtic: but rms is a greybeard. a neckbeard who is respected widely for technical contributions
antephialtic: a friend of mine works in the same building as stallman. says he does all kinds of weird shit in the office
mircea_popescu: antephialtic most neckbeards make excellent worhorses. doesn't mean anyone would want them i nthe house.