722300+ entries in 0.359s
mircea_popescu: pretty cool
the faraday cages asciilifeform came up with huh.
HeySteve: hmm, I should lay out my garden with hedges and such in
the form of my GPU
bitcoinpete: ;;later
tell mircea_popescu:
that must've been
the stupid spam-blocker i
tried adding recently. it's now deactivated. i'm vaguely familiar with
the gentlemanliness of middle ages aristocratic rivalries. sounds lovely, really. far more pleasant
than
the
tyrannical populi or
tyrannical khans bookending it.
gribble: Bitstamp BTCUSD
ticker | Best bid: 473.75, Best ask: 474.62, Bid-ask spread: 0.87000, Last
trade: 474.62, 24 hour volume: 12563.33651067, 24 hour low: 470.0, 24 hour high: 506.97, 24 hour vwap: 482.543433306
gribble: Bitstamp BTCUSD
ticker | Best bid: 476.0, Best ask: 476.08, Bid-ask spread: 0.08000, Last
trade: 476.0, 24 hour volume: 12555.59750920, 24 hour low: 470.0, 24 hour high: 506.97, 24 hour vwap: 482.722329726
TestingUnoDosTre: Had
this beer
today
that was brewed with
the hottest peppers in
the world. Slightly afraid I'm going
to piss fire
tonight.
TestingUnoDosTre: JavaScript,
the,most powerful
tool on
the internet after <blink>
mircea_popescu: ;;later
tell bitcoinpete anyway, i was saying
that
teh yurpeans also had
the sort of war-as-a-sporting-event
thing, before
the french "republic" invented socialism.
they worked just fine for evereyone (yes, including
those least qualified
to form an opinion on
the matter).
mircea_popescu: ;;later
tell bitcoinpete so i just
tried
to put a comment in, but "forbidden please enable javascript". as if.
mircea_popescu: except one of
the most critical pieces of security infrastructure was NOT reviewed
mircea_popescu: thestringpuller im willing
to share it with
teh girls!
mircea_popescu: ;;later
tell jborkl
the only
thing asics are good for is
that it's no longer perfectly feasible for an actor with a fab
to
take over
the chain. it's not something wanted, but moreover something
that couldn't be avoided.
thestringpuller: i
think
the fun needs
to be divided equally and shared with everyone equally, regardless of contribution...
thestringpuller: it'll get more fun every year as long as we live
to see it
mircea_popescu: you don't understand. it's best
to have bigger shares of number.
kakobrekla: point is how many you hold and what is
the btc offset
mircea_popescu: what if
there's going
to be a scam report next from garr
that goat sold him
THE CHEAP SHAREs
kakobrekla: but yeah, i can see him reasoning
that keeping
the cheap shares is a good idea
kakobrekla: the only reason he would fake it
to save his rep
mircea_popescu: kakobrekla but... he got repaid 0.6 for
the shares he bought over .6 but he kept
the others, bought at .1 ?
kakobrekla: 03:39.19 ( +mircea_popescu ) ".6 for
the shares I bought at .6 or higher. I have all
the other shares, some were bought at .1 or so. I got 80% back and saved me a few years of courts and whatever (and he saved 20 years in jail). "
this crap makes exactly 0 sense. < it doesnt need
to make sense, goat is an idiot but garr is bigger one. it is possible he bluff pressed it.
mircea_popescu: so your hypotethical dood going around nicking as other people
to fuck up
the logs paternity was being chastised.
mircea_popescu: you were like, o, someone could derp in here. and i was like, yeah, but
they need voice. so you were like, well, maybe
they have it.
artifexd: I wanted
to clarify whether I was being chastised.
mircea_popescu: you don't need
technology
to solve all edge cases. you just need it
to give peoplez
teh
tools
to do it
themselves.
mircea_popescu: artifexd yeah, and if you keep doing
this sort of shit you won't have voice anymore and problem solved.
artifexd: Just for a short period of
time. :)
mircea_popescu: ".6 for
the shares I bought at .6 or higher. I have all
the other shares, some were bought at .1 or so. I got 80% back and saved me a few years of courts and whatever (and he saved 20 years in jail). "
this crap makes exactly 0 sense.
artifexd: Since nick changes don't show up in
the log (do
they?) later on, it could look like benkay was actually in here.
artifexd: Colors was just a possible implementation.
The real point was
to have
the gribble auth status in
the logs.
kakobrekla: i
think _i_ cant /nick because im
the owner
artifexd: nick.
This, of course, assumes
trust of
the person maintaining
the logs.
artifexd: mircea_popescu: It was
the conversations part
that led me
to my suggestion about adding ident information
to log.bitcoin-assets.com. If you and I are
talking right now, I can ensure
that you are who I
think you are (wot-wise). But if I'm researching you and I find some stuff
that your nick said in
the log. I don't know if it was you or someone with your
kakobrekla: well i guess i
try
to give
the lungs a bit of rest each night so
the bedroom is smokeless.
mircea_popescu: if
the forum ever finds out what she's been doing with her salary...
mircea_popescu: kakobrekla dude could you believe
that chick's dress ?
mircea_popescu: artifexd a major point perhaps not so specifically stated in
the article is
that an actually working wot has
two parts,
the wot (ie, graph of relations) and
the channel (ie, graph of conversations).
they support each other, and
the "real" wot is
their juncture, in a sense.
dignork: sorry mp, he is in IL, it's 3am
there
kakobrekla: you did manage
to get
the attention of bfl shills
ozbot: Spondoolies
Tech Plug&Mine
dignork: mircea_popescu: so if you had questions
to Spondoolies-Tech, vcorem is
the guy
kakobrekla: not sure what
the policies are on other networks
kakobrekla: but we were already discussing
this earlier, nickserv suck. perhaps especially on freenode
danielpbarron: artifexd: I believe it does.. you can't get voice without being authed i
think
artifexd: kakobrekla: It would be awesome if logs.bitcoin-assets.com could indicate if
the person making a statement was authed with nickserv and/or ident with gribble at
the
time he/she made
the statement. Like color coding
the log entry or something.
kakobrekla: well, gotta leave something for people
to wonder about in
the following centuries
TestingUnoDosTre: I
thought it meant rates something legit as if it were illegitimate
kakobrekla: and "herps derps legit
things" meaning
talking about legit
things which
the author assumes is not legit,
thats why
the herp and derp
artifexd: mircea_popescu is saying
that if I were
to see both ratings I would have a view of what happened such
that I wouldn't need
to ask anything about it, but, if I ignored one of
the ratings, I would have a different view of what happened such
that I would need
to investigate more and
thus possibly expose a falsified event?
artifexd: <kakobrekla> So now each of
them herps derps legit
things. You see half of it. <-
That now reads as
they both make legitimate ratings but "you" only pays attention
to one of
the ratings.
thestringpuller: i hope
there is a hot chick in
that shower with you kakobrekla
artifexd: With
that in mind, re-reading...
artifexd: So "suspect
to be sx" means "suspect
to be a malicious node".
artifexd: OH! When he says sx and sy, he is referring
to nodes, but more specifically,
they are malicious nodes.
artifexd: I have not. A sybil attack is something
that I
thought I understood.
artifexd: The phrase "ignoring what I suspect
to be sx"
throws me.