71800+ entries in 0.509s

mircea_popescu: there's
a very directly computable homomorphism, the item being you know, the algebraic ring.
a111: Logged on 2016-08-30 17:29 asciilifeform: davout: 'ring signatures' are not the promised 'invisibility cloak', but more of
a smoke grenade.
mircea_popescu: for the needs of this contortion, K3, K4, K9, K11 is
a subgroup of K3, K4, K7, K9
mircea_popescu: ie, if K3 owns input I5, and if K3 signs I5, then it can be verified that the ring composed of K3, K4, K7, K9
a) signed I5, and b) owned I5 to sign it ; but it can't be verified that any subgroup didn't own I5.
mircea_popescu: Let there be private keys K1...Kn. Let there be uxto associated with these, I1..Im so that any one I is associated with one and only one K. let there be
a function S, so that the verification function V(Kx, S(Iy)) is always false, or uncomputable, or whatever whereas V(K1..Kn, S(Iy)) is always true if and only if the K Iy is associated to signed it.
shinohai: To be fair, trilema is
a big place.
a111: Logged on 2016-02-06 16:44 mircea_popescu: asciilifeform "- He says current block ciphers suck. Why? It doesn't really become clear from the discussion, which seems to be between two people who have heard
a little bit about cryptography, and are trying to outdo each other in what little knowledge they have."
a111: Logged on 2016-02-05 01:26 asciilifeform: mircea_popescu: played around with
a few graph-theoretical approaches (in particular, max-clique problem)
BingoBoingo: <mircea_popescu> 19yo female, bb. that's not occuring. << Frequent occurence. Typical hardware store is full of 19 year old girls. Even in the lumber section. Pinterest is
a thing apparently.
mircea_popescu: because we were doing
a review of possibly weaponizable known problems
a111: Logged on 2016-02-10 20:10 mircea_popescu: basically showing that
a+b < c is true or false for
a, b, c in R is
a harder-than-NP problem.
mircea_popescu: anyway. the encryption scheme is like this : you generate
a large graph with
a hamiltonian cycle ; and
a homomorphic graph.
mircea_popescu: and there was
a scheme proposed whereby you either show the graphs or the relation ; op keeps challenging you ; each correct response increases the probabiling of truth by
a factor of 2
mircea_popescu: asciilifeform there's this scheme whereby i create
a graph,
A and
a homomorphism of it
A'. you get ot see
A', and may challenge me
mircea_popescu: (note that the decomposition needn't be Vs but will likely be
a homomorphism, which POSSIBLY tyakes us straight to the hardest code known to man, the see-or-pick homomorphisms)
mircea_popescu: asciilifeform re-reading i am pretty much convinced that the requirement that
a) signatures are produced pairwise nevertheless b) no pairwise verification function exists yet c) verification works on
a group of them is batshit insanity. might as well ask for
a 5 smaller than 4.
mircea_popescu: in FACT, the MORE sigs it uses in
a ring, the more expensive the tx fee should be.
mircea_popescu: asciilifeform this is an "idea" item not
a technological object, so bear with me.
a "ring signature" is
a set of signatures with
a) arbitrary cardinality n which has the property that b) while it can be verified the correct signature was offered it c) can't be established wich signature that is.
mircea_popescu: you can't turn out your wife without being married to
a whore, alfie.
mircea_popescu: yes, but moreover he'll just keep
a few blocks and go for new nonces more often
mircea_popescu: half the reason i'm
a shitty scientist : unlike the good ones, i get laid.
mircea_popescu: he who knows
a secret key is
a bitcoin user ; he who can say if ia signed transaction is valid or invalid is
a bitcoin node ; he who can include
a bitcoin transaction in
a block is
a bitcoin miner.
mircea_popescu: turn on your livingroom lights, pretend you're "running
a node". exactly the same as "bang on keyboard, pretend you're writing"
mircea_popescu: understand, there's no way to at the same time give nodes marketable data AND make it so any redditard can just pop
a node
mircea_popescu: "mining
a block takes
a century" currently, it's no bug.
pete_dushenski: speaking of learning, "Core exists as dictatorship and tyranny, upholding speech control, colluding to attack people with different views, has become the biggest threat of the long-term development of Bitcoin". ~bitmain miner guy (
http://imgur.com/a/mhEEd) omraphantom: i've looked into crypto recently i've been poking at this key stuff last couple days been learning
a lot
pete_dushenski: omraphantom: i'm sure BingoBoingo can mentor you on carpentry but he's
a couple states away in mo.
omraphantom: they have
a carpenter friend that was in my state i should meet apparently. i have
a furniture blueprint just zero skills lol
omraphantom: i might start and end up pursuing
a different degree
pete_dushenski: omraphantom: aha just getting rolling then. eh no rush to start eng school.
a chunk of the guys here started but didn't even finish
pete_dushenski: probably
a slightly older kinkster engineer than omraphantom
mircea_popescu: they've been doing this whole "add logos to
a printed page" thing for years now, it did 0.
mircea_popescu: wow check it out,
a quarter of the baikal chip's unused.
trinque: BingoBoingo: no response eh? I'll take
a look
a111: Logged on 2017-03-01 01:27 mircea_popescu: and
a very fine point in case here, from my own personal experience, is that xapo sad faggot, wences casares.
shinohai: tfw
a camho faves the State of the Bitcoin Address tweet
mod6: shinohai: did you just burn through
a ton of tools or what?
mircea_popescu: and i do mean this. nobody. tom cook isn't
a fucking ceo, and if i replaced him with hillary's daughter there'd be no perceptible difference anywhere.
mircea_popescu: koch is not some coder, he's
a sad fuck who lies about where he gets the code.
mircea_popescu: this is the entirety of everyone. stallman is not some sort of graybeard, he's
a sad fuck who lied about what laptop setup he is using.
mircea_popescu: i had since opportunity to verify all of them, and they are all false. he's as much of
a businessman as any random redditard, which specifically includes pirate, the silk road dork, etcetera.
mircea_popescu: and
a very fine point in case here, from my own personal experience, is that xapo sad faggot, wences casares.
☟︎ mircea_popescu: asciilifeform i am not entirely sure that ability to distinguish wasn't more of
a symptom of the cockroach working than anything else. "i can distinguish tarantula that bit me from tarantula that did not" is scarcely
a quote after linnaeus.
mircea_popescu: if we took samantha cocks or whatever her name was and made her "
a scientist" and took the supurating jeoffrey and made him "an engineer", they'd what ? go right to it without skipping
a beat, that's what the "revolving door" even denotes.
mircea_popescu: there has to be some sort of definite difference in something, legs, mandibula, reproductive organs, something somewhere must allow classification in the proper sense to have
a classification.
mircea_popescu: the etymology of the very word is instructive. barbarism comes from the greek hurrdurr, and it literally as well as onomatopoetically denotes that ... they do not have
a thing.
mircea_popescu: the young girl is not "an alternate woman" but
a not-yet-woman.
mircea_popescu: anyway, the importance of cutting short the gypsy's pretense that he lives in an alt-country ; the grubfilth's pretense that he has an alt-hygiene, the neoprotestant's pretense that he has an alt-religion (discoivered it himself, he did!) and so on is key.
a "vegan" is not someone who "has an alternative cookbook" but an imbecile who doesn't know how and what to eat. and so on.
mircea_popescu: perhaps "if you had to" you'd climb to infinity on the left rather than descend to infinity on the right. but inasmuch as it's
a nonsensical construction, the counterfactual will stay nonfactual.