log☇︎
679900+ entries in 0.445s
mike_c: but even that was better tested. hypothesis was formed before the analysis, not as a result of the analysis.
mike_c: strategy like MPIF's is really based more on a belief about how the system works rather than statistical analysis.
mike_c: punkman: you can cut up the data you have into pieces. but I really don't think there's enough for much confidence in results.
punkman: mike_c, wanna make some synthetic data for testing?
mike_c: yup, i got that. just talking about the fees.
TheNewDeal: I said something more like 2 BTC to begin with
TheNewDeal: mike_c if you read what I said, I told you that I was NOT comfortable risking 10 BTC on coinbr/mpoe
mike_c: TheNewDeal: last comment from me, i'm really not trying to sell you. But that 'tiny percentage' you were talking about from hedge fund managers is usually 2%. which is the same fee as coinbr in your 10 BTC example.
TheNewDeal: is there a minimum for password protected bets?
mike_c: punkman: you should look into some of the theory about backtesting. like, you can't use the same data you develop your hypothesis on to test your strategy.
TheNewDeal: how would you know which to skip?
TheNewDeal: arent you just picking and choosing past bets that would make money?
TheNewDeal: that doesnt make sense to me
punkman: well if this retarded strategy can do 46% I think I got some margin for error
moiety: how can you be wrong wanting to earn your money XD
moiety: nothing wrong with that, i'm same
TheNewDeal: the thing I also like about bitbet is that you can pick off bets that are almost for sure winners, and look for a certain return
mike_c: except kako, who won't take any money unless he thinks he earns it (very un-hedge fund like)
punkman: just testing over past bets
punkman: I think I will try
TheNewDeal: punkman, have you done this successfully?
TheNewDeal: usually is a tiny percentage of what they manage
mike_c: hm. hedge fund managers get a fee too.
TheNewDeal: I would prefer that he were like a hedge fund manager, making % off your winnings
mike_c: how would you feel if the monthly fee were lower and the trading fees higher?
TheNewDeal: but that would be a waste of money
TheNewDeal: what I would really like to do is start off with 2 or so BTC until I feel comfortable with it
mike_c: ok. lemme ask this then. if you thought you could get a 20% return on coinbr in a year, would you invest 10 btc?
TheNewDeal: coinbr is restricted to MPOE stocks, and I'm very unfamiliar with them compared to those who trade
TheNewDeal: it has nothing to do with trust
assbot: BitBet - 1BTC >= $10,000 USD :: 75 B (15%) on Yes, 415.18 B (85%) on No | closing in 5 months 22 hours | weight: 42`696 (100`000 to 1)
TheNewDeal: if I put down 10 BTC on this bet http://bitbet.us/bet/635/1btc-10-000-usd/
mike_c: but you would be comfortable putting that much on bitbet?
mike_c: ok. so point #1, you think it's too expensive. but why wouldn't you be comfortable putting in 10 btc?
TheNewDeal: with NO withdrawls, that has just taken 1/4 of my profits over a year
TheNewDeal: subtract account management fees, and thats 10.76
TheNewDeal: let's say I am comfortable investing 10 BTC through coinbr ( I'm not)
TheNewDeal: let me throw out a hypothetical here
mike_c: i'm not trying to bust balls, i'm honestly curious.
gribble: Currently authenticated from hostmask jurov!~jurov@mx.coinbr.com. Trust relationship from user TheNewDeal to user jurov: Level 1: 0, Level 2: 4 via 3 connections. Graph: http://b-otc.com/stg?source=TheNewDeal&dest=jurov | WoT data: http://b-otc.com/vrd?nick=jurov | Rated since: Fri Jan 20 18:16:32 2012
mike_c: ;;gettrust TheNewDeal jurov
mike_c: you think coinbr is too much counterparty risk?
TheNewDeal: I trading what I own and owning what I trade
TheNewDeal: no offense, just not my cup of tea
TheNewDeal: staying far from coinbr for the time being
mike_c: coinbr is full featured these days.
TheNewDeal: would love to, but just not my reality
TheNewDeal: I don't have the capital to trade on mpoe
TheNewDeal: and those people were probably just looking at pot odds
mike_c: all i'm saying is, if you think you have an edge, whip up some IDIFF.SEP contracts.
TheNewDeal: after 84'000 weight, there were only 2 Yes bets
TheNewDeal: I'm typically a conservative better
TheNewDeal: look at the majority of bets there
TheNewDeal: when it's much harder to tell
TheNewDeal: The majority of those that bet Yes on May bet early
mike_c: k. betting that difficulty won't double in a month is not "betting against diff"
TheNewDeal: here's the thing
TheNewDeal: bet was started at the end of january
TheNewDeal: I bet at the end of march
mike_c: ok, so with your superior prognostication, what weight did you get on the may bet?
TheNewDeal: mike_c , what I'm saying is that some people don't know how to calculate a good difficulty
benkay: lol ya diff is watching bitbet just to fuck people who bet against it
mike_c: TheNewDeal: everyone says that because 1) you can't draw a line from previous diff changes to future (see moore's law), and 2) despite this it just keeps marching up.
benkay: TheNewDeal: that TSLA bet is interesting - aren't we p.close to 250 already?
assbot: BitBet - Cardano to Ship in 2014 :: 1.08 B (96%) on Yes, 0.05 B (4%) on No | closing in 6 months 1 week| weight: 85`913 (100`000 to 1)
moiety: not the smallest window of time XD but i'll wait patiently :]
benkay: but also probably after the cardano ships
moiety: firefox just lost five pieces of work that ive been doing for past two days, so pissed off
benkay: aaaand i may not even use a cacheing layer at the end of the day
punkman: guy's doing some good there with that Jepsen thing
benkay: decision made thank you punkman
TheNewDeal: part of the bet requires an actual decent estimate on what the diff will be at that point
TheNewDeal: why does everyone say that?
TheNewDeal: tried to make a little hedge bet on with the next change and it backfired in my face
TheNewDeal: or took a big stumble
TheNewDeal: I wouldn't mind if the hash jumped off a cliff right now
TheNewDeal: this current potential change and the last
TheNewDeal: I guess the 12.44 wasn't that bad
TheNewDeal: last two changes effed you guys
BingoBoingo: mike_c: This is a troubling increase in hash
TheNewDeal: yes but this would have been a different situation, as bitcoin was $1000+ at the time
benkay: hang on i may be a few too beers deep to keep track of my +/- axes
TheNewDeal: I don't think the dealeship would allow your to return it for the same amount of btc
Mats_cd03: you think dealerships have the freedom to hold btc?
benkay: buy a tesla with btc
benkay: wow there's a fucking hack
assbot: Man Buys $103K Tesla Model S With Bitcoin
TheNewDeal: http://mashable.com/2013/12/09/tesla-bitcoin/ this dude bought it for 91.4 BTC. Probably could return it for just as much right now
Mats_cd03: in practical terms it ends up converted to fiat anyway
benkay: i guess that's what you get when you sell directly - the freedom to take whatever
kakobrekla: afaik you can buy tesla with btc (buttstamp guys didit)
benkay: anyone with the btc to lay on a tesla can lay the cash on it, and probably more easily.
TheNewDeal: benkay totally confused me for a second there
Mats_cd03: from the way people pile on TSLA
Mats_cd03: you'd think he was jesus preparing to take the believers to live on mars
Mats_cd03: people are unreasonable when it comes to musk
benkay: must be the stars.
TheNewDeal: QE is definitely pumping the stocks at the moment
benkay: whats the qt you're talking about - not the UI kit?
TheNewDeal: holy shit. Tesla was at 30$ last year?