67000+ entries in 0.575s

ascii_field: iirc what mircea
_popescu painstakingly explained in that old thread is that there is not, of course, a magical incantation which makes a 'revoked' key stop working
assbot: Logged on 01-09-2015 20:19:54; mircea
_popescu: i'm spending a lot more than 1k / mo on hosting. in fact i spend more on servers living space than on women living space, for my sins ;/
assbot: Logged on 15-05-2015 03:34:04; assbot: Logged on 14-05-2015 21:44:05; ascii
_field: i'm kinda curious why mircea
_popescu considers a new key signed with a previous key to not be a logical continuation of the same identity. (is it because of the impossibility of hard-guaranteed revocation, as discussed in previous thread?)
ascii_field: not only that, but rms is not mircea
_popescu and the thieves would cry 'stop thief', sue inventor for using own item, and win.
assbot: Logged on 01-09-2015 16:07:54; ben
_vulpes: and the 'open source world' went along with this for how long?
thestringpuller: ascii
_field: so much of what imho needs to be done, cannot be done. << doesn't this technically make it impossible?
jurov: ascii
_field: you relish in impossible requirements, don't you? i just that ... palpable improvement over some box no one in the wot ever saw, is possible
jurov: mircea
_popescu: yes i will ask about the locking and exact dimensions. also will need someone to make the shopping list and plan,
mircea_popescu: <ascii
_field> or, alternatively, failing to do anything on account of waiting << i could give some examples of this, but of dubious actual substance.
ascii_field: mircea
_popescu: ah point is to explain that 'cage' is a kind of standard term, like 'barrel' in petro industry
mircea_popescu: ascii
_field and a traditional wife cooks. what's your point.
phf: mike
_c: ah but it's not true that nobody has those lists. ascii has one, i'm sure does mp, mod6 and ben
_vulpes. i keep one too from reading the logs in a text file
mike_c: ascii
_field: the locking thing is not the biggest thing to me, more the accurate list of things that could/should be done.
ascii_field: mike
_c: can you think of a time when two+ people ended up doing the same things?
ascii_field: and mike
_c is right, it is not entirely current.
mike_c: ascii
_field; but it's out of date and incomplete
phf: mike
_c: do you have a todo list for bitcoind written somewhere? or for v?
assbot: Logged on 01-09-2015 19:21:09; mircea
_popescu: jurov half a cage is what, 4u ?
ascii_field: mike
_c: the beauty of 'v' is that no server, as such, is needed
assbot: Logged on 05-08-2015 03:55:05; mircea
_popescu: asciilifeform he still has a point. a) we're careening dangerously towards -dev levels and b) people can't fucking follow wtf is on that list.
phf: mircea
_popescu: i've come to appreciate the approach from observing it. one person who shapes the entire thing, and everyone else works with the given directions or else operates fully autonomously. people can still form subgroups for short term goals, but without imposing structure on the rest. etc. etc.
assbot: Logged on 05-08-2015 14:26:47; asciilifeform: mircea
_popescu: i once thought about placing antecedent hashes in patch headers
ascii_field: mircea
_popescu: i did most of a linguistics degree, can do certain things
assbot: Logged on 01-09-2015 19:08:42; mircea
_popescu: no, v is the only correct solution to "windows update" problem.
mats: ascii
_field: translates loosely to '[learning] the way of the barbarians to control barbarians'
mircea_popescu: mike
_c incidentally the reason i won't recite a todo list for v (and deleted alf's proposed list) is specifically because we don't even understand yet fully its implication. bitcoin-like.
phf: mike
_c: there's a recent openbsd presentation that argues against claiming. their point is that the problem of duplicate effort is a lot rarer then lock grabs. and i must add duplicate effort always results in increased understanding if both solutions are analyzed
mircea_popescu: mike
_c my definition of "know each other" is, "they can navigate the who's doing what maze". that's the bar.
mircea_popescu: mike
_c understand, there's no promise that V will result in even similar bitcoins.
phf: mike
_c: "dianetics is not wrong, it's just that you're failing at apply it", aha ;)
trinque: mircea
_popescu: maybe not; thought was you patch in new textfiles into some directory structure
ascii_field: mike
_c: please don't hesitate to experiment with 'v'
mike_c: mod6, ben
_vulpes: does the foundation have any ideological opinions on something like trac?
ascii_field: mircea
_popescu: no but reality means that if i have to spend two weeks appearing in a courtroom, for whatever reason, i starve.
ascii_field: mircea
_popescu: if i did not put my income through it, then it is a plain tax shelter and this lasts precisely five seconds if anyone so much as farts on it
mircea_popescu: ascii
_field that was entirely a different story. he was trying to organise his coding income through a llc.
ascii_field: also mircea
_popescu appears to have forgotten about mr stack and his programmatory llc ?
☟︎ assbot: Logged on 01-09-2015 17:56:08; mircea
_popescu: the appearance of "costs" is what's known in poker as a trap. to keep the fucktards out. so dun be a fucktard, you can think, there's no rule that you may only think about coding or something. think all through, the same way, everywhere.
mircea_popescu: ascii
_field you're a smart kid, do the math. or better yet, have the girl do the math.
mircea_popescu: ascii
_field 4x 40 bucks ? so ? why do you care ? tax deductible.
ascii_field: mircea
_popescu: i did think about this, earlier; principal obstacle is the provision of adequate cooling in my sorry hovel. but in the absence of a better idea, will have to resort to this
ascii_field: mircea
_popescu: traditional lease in this part of the world, for human habitation, is 1y
mircea_popescu: ascii
_field i think you should apologize before making fool of self kthx.
ascii_field: but this is really for mircea
_popescu to decide, given as he supplied this item as 'pro bono'
BingoBoingo: <pete
_dushenski> not a ~real~ recession, those don't happen in the biggest bestest firstest americas << Testnet Americans
ascii_field: mircea
_popescu: i am ready to move it. but can't think of, yet, a good place to move it ~to~
mircea_popescu: ascii
_field well, sent note pointing out that if it happens again that's it for that box. i'm not so convinced it'll do anything. consequently... prep to move it, i guess. got any suggestions of location ?
punkman: ascii
_field: I remember reading about it in 2013, stumbled upon it today. nothing inbetween
assbot: Logged on 01-09-2015 16:07:54; ben
_vulpes: and the 'open source world' went along with this for how long?
assbot: Logged on 01-09-2015 16:07:42; ben
_vulpes: so not just technically challenging to call into the c code of but actually deliberately obfuscated?
assbot: Logged on 01-09-2015 15:51:39; ben
_vulpes: asciilifeform: /why/ was gpg written to be unlibrarizable?
trinque: ben
_vulpes: also a barrier to poetterings, maybe
punkman: pete
_dushenski: it was working earlier when I looked, I think
assbot: Logged on 01-09-2015 08:27:20; mircea
_popescu: anyway, the ridiculous pretense that openssl is still even a thing at all.
fluffypony: BingoBoingo: well it's either that or we have to refactor every exception into functions
_windows.cpp / functions
_bsd.cpp / functions
_linux.cpp etc., which would make the code splintered and extremely hard to work with
BingoBoingo: mircea
_popescu: Time machine could also work
phf: for example this code
http://paste.lisp.org/display/154625 validates signatures (using ccl's ffi generator and slightly patched gnupg 1.4.19), but on failure verify
_signature either prints to stdout, with no notable return code or sometimes exit(...)'s the whole process
mod6: ok, i think i get it. neither patches/asciilifeform
_maxint
_locks
_corrected.vpatch or patches/asciilifeform
_add
_verifyall
_option.vpatch have any dependants (d's)
mod6: asciilifeform: qq, I was under the impression that when using press, if I picked something like 'maxint
_corrected', it would patch all the way up through that one. but it didn't seem to apply the -verifyall patch? or do I misunderstand how its supposed to work?
http://dpaste.com/1J2BS40.txt thoughts?
mircea_popescu: "mircea
_popescu: giving inept infantrymen good horses doesn't create an elite cavalry regiment, it just creates a lot of injured horses. giving stupid people smart things doesn't make them smart. it'll just make a lot of broken smart things."
assbot: Logged on 01-09-2015 02:51:34; asciilifeform: mircea
_popescu: after the thread!