65400+ entries in 0.041s

mircea_popescu: asciilifeform no, don't you remember
this
thing ? some dood went off deep end,
that
there's a cvasi-magical virus in his usb stick. cca 2015 vintage logs
☟︎ mircea_popescu: Firefox 50.0 32-bit on Linux << should be easy enough
to
test
mircea_popescu: is
this more of
that romanian fellow's "magical usb stick aliens" ?
|\n: not
to mention
that amount of such holes, of course if
that works, is immense
mircea_popescu: |\n suppose you start by introducing yourself and showing
the minimum awareness of republican process of using sane fucking pastebins.
mircea_popescu: i'd rather hang
the moron flattering himself with "enemy"
that
tried
to lose me a disk
than either of
these.
mircea_popescu: i don't even
think
there's anything wrong whatsoever with studying
the damned
thing. my reservations were strictly around investing any kind of "this is
te republic's encryptodisk" flag on it\
mircea_popescu: i certainly see
the point re "explore
the space" ; and yes a serpent implemented as both eulora workhorse and verilog is better studied
than just former.
a111: Logged on 2018-10-26 16:08 asciilifeform: mircea_popescu: in re
these lulz, at one point asciilifeform dug for 'anybody ever verilog-ified serpent?' and found a stack of 'papers'. any src ? mno. but plenty of 'discussion' of supposed 'implementation', in
the
traditional nadia henninger style .
mod6: hanbot:
That's awesome,
thanks!
mircea_popescu: asciilifeform so did you measure
throughput of
this
thing ?
a111: Logged on 2018-10-13 07:14 hanbot: anyway
the idea is
to have an exhaustive list of news outlets with
their contact email made, after which i'll have her mail
that blurb; i expect something like a week's
turnaround, and will report when it's done.
mircea_popescu: asciilifeform basically, if it fits in 1/3 of
the chip ?
BingoBoingo: <mircea_popescu> BingoBoingo it was just a
throway oneliner ic ame up with while walking off a steak, sadly no more
there. << AH, I
though maybe
Tess Hollandaise died of excess mass and had been replaced as leader of
the hamplanets by a younger, dumpier model
Mocky: mircea_popescu, do you have any interest in kuwait? if so I can keep
this lead warm on
the back burner while I work qatar
mircea_popescu: BingoBoingo it was just a
throway oneliner ic ame up with while walking off a steak, sadly no more
there.
BingoBoingo still waiting
to hear
the new fope's identity
mircea_popescu: i wont cry if every once in 256 cases you do an extra oaep
that 50-50 might've not been needed.
a111: Logged on 2018-10-26 21:09 diana_coman: basically "which one has a higher octet first if I walk
them from left
to right?"
a111: Logged on 2018-10-26 21:02 diana_coman: asciilifeform, I guess mircea_popescu has a point: one can choose just *what* has
to go
through
the MPI swamp and what not
deedbot: BingoBoingo paid
trinque invoice 3
diana_coman: asciilifeform, myeah, I don't claim I fully know everything
that goes on in
there and I quite doubt anybody does; and ftr yes, I'm not at all comfortable with
the fact
that I had
to and have
to sign it but... I have
to, pretty much
diana_coman: asciilifeform, in some sense MPI lib is a very good illustration for all sorts of
things - "make a call and be surprised" sort of
things, especially re memory allocation
diana_coman: more of a hack
to accommodate
the stink of MPI - not sure it's something we want in
there; if anything, I guess I can see more
the point
to just walking
the octets in
the array and basically doing
the comparison in Ada
diana_coman:
http://btcbase.org/log/2018-10-26#1866643 -
to detail
this:
technically speaking one CAN
test
top bit until it's 0 for
the oaep block (hence for *sure* < modulus) but I don't
think it's great mainly because: 1.
this fixes one more bit 2. it's really a way bigger hammer
than needed - it can start with 1 and be smaller
than modulus so potentially increases
the number of repeat-oaep without any good reason 3. it's not even particularly clean,
☝︎ diana_coman: asciilifeform,
theoretically yes; practically since one calls stuff from mpi lib
to create
the MPIs,
there are all sorts of
things going on in
there
diana_coman is still pondering
the best way
to
treat
that so it doesn't make a mess
diana_coman: and yes,
the mpi-variable-buffer-returned gives me some headaches
diana_coman: that's
the headache: oaep in ada, comparison in C, if not right, oaep in ada again, if right
then rsa in C
diana_coman: yes, c_wrappers
that I wrote have a wrapper for precisely
that mpi_compare
thing among other stuff
diana_coman: asciilifeform, I gave up on using gnat's ; mainly because at previous experience
things went weird quite quickly
diana_coman: basically "which one has a higher octet first if I walk
them from left
to right?"
☟︎ diana_coman: but
the comparison is iffy since either a. call c-wrapper and so do conversion from ada's oaep array of octets
to C's MPI shit
diana_coman: yes,
this is for
the OAEP part - current algo repeats
the oaep padding until
the result is < modulus of given key (since otherwise it can't rsa afterwards)
diana_coman: but it's
true
that doing
the whole conversion
to c and conversion back *just for
the sake of an MPI comparison* might be uglier
than just walking
the arrays and seeing which one has a bit set first
diana_coman: precisely why I preferred
to make a wrapper for it so I don't import
the whole stinking pile further up
diana_coman: and for
the other it's
the C style
thing where it allocates memory
the way it sees fit and
the caller is supposed afterwards
to clean up
the mess when it likes
diana_coman: BUT: for one
thing as previously noticed +
tested
they
trim leading 0 so if you feed it an array with 0 you will NOT get it back
the same
diana_coman: asciilifeform, it shits a shit:
there is get_mpi_buffer and set_mpi_buffer
that
theoretically do
that
diana_coman: asciilifeform, I guess mircea_popescu has a point: one can choose just *what* has
to go
through
the MPI swamp and what not
☟︎