log☇︎
645800+ entries in 0.449s
mircea_popescu: the reason we met is because for a few years that is no longer the problem.
mircea_popescu: that ~used~ to be the problem, before we met, for many years.
usg_press_machin: I think the problem is that governments can do nasty things. We each have our own way of dealing with it. I do so within the rules the system sets out; MP does it his own way. Different approaches.
mircea_popescu: has nothing to do with murder. everything to do with college degrees, global warming and so on.
mircea_popescu: "this isn't a good apple because its not fda approved" "have you tasted it ?" "i don't need to"
mircea_popescu: well ok, so now we can agree, the problem is the red tape.
justusranvier: Psychopaths gonna psycho in any situation. The current situation is that when certain psychopaths put on the right costume, all of a sudden something flips in everybody else's brains wherein they regard the actions of the psychopath in completely oppostie moral terms.
mircea_popescu: the salem trials is the convenient case study here. you can decry them as "incipient government establishing itself the way government establiushes itself all time, all places : through murder". but just as well... people kill, and some killers are persuasive.
mircea_popescu: maybe the murderer is persuasive ?
justusranvier: The myth has nothing to do with the mindset of the murder - it's about everbody else.
mircea_popescu: that's also never going away. if i thought the victim was kinda cool i'd not have killed them. once i killed them, obviously i will go on thinking they sucked.
justusranvier: True, there will always be murders. What can be ended is the myth that murder isn't evil just because somebody drapes a fancy title on themselves and cloaks their actions in euphamisms
mircea_popescu: as distasteful as that reality may be.
justusranvier: Murder is murder, no matter what kind of costume somebody wears. "The state" is the lie that a magic costume can turn murder into "public policy" or some other such nonsense.
mircea_popescu: and it dun look all that "normal".
mircea_popescu: the state as a voluntary association, all they who choose and wish to pay taxe sand obeys the law is what we have here already.
mircea_popescu: well bureaucracy needs to control the money, and so that's the end of that.
usg_press_machin: I think it was Hannah Arendt who pointed it out - "bureaucracy is rule by nobody"
justusranvier: "the state" is an excuse one group of people make up to explain why their crimes are actually virtuous
usg_press_machin: If "sovereign" means "monopoly on the use of force" or determining how force should be used, I'm in the camp that the state makes that call. There should be exceptions and limitations, and it's the task of politically active people to make sure those lines reflect their views.
ben_vulpes: pity those of us fighting for sovereignty
usg_press_machin: Again, maybe. It depends on where you draw that line.
usg_press_machin: Maybe. Depends on the definitions we use.
usg_press_machin: Thanks Mircea. I think crypto has a place to carve out individual privacy, but I don't think it necessarily follows that the only option is to view the relationship in terms of conflict. Reading now
justusranvier: Read the last paragraph of that article
mircea_popescu: that's more sexual perversion than rebellion neh ?
justusranvier: I like Tom Baugh's tendency to corrupt the youth
mircea_popescu: (but it rests me at ease to hear from the usg_press_machine itself that crypto is no longer armament)
mircea_popescu: to me it sounds kinda like "a movie can't be good if it doesn't have car chases and those anti-physical sparks bullets make in hollywood"
mircea_popescu: how's this formal approach to things worked for you so far ?
usg_press_machin: I'd disagree - that'd be protest. Rebellion implies something a bit more organised, serious, and threatening.
mircea_popescu: well, inasmuch as someone';s breaking the law and not paying taxes, yes. that'd be the definition of a rebellion.
mircea_popescu: the situation is in fact quite symmetrical, whichever side you're on the other will prolly not like it.
usg_press_machin: Is there a rebellion?
mircea_popescu: in short : your notion that sitting with the usg is safe and joining the rebels is dangerous is fundamentally broken. sitting with the usg is safe except if the rebels get the upper hand. ☟︎
mircea_popescu: and as to "never ever" : pre nurenberg, this trying of a foreign power's officers and ministers had also never ever happened.
mircea_popescu: it's what the tradition points to, at any rate.
mircea_popescu: here's the legal convention : anyone who worked for the tsar in any capacity, 20 years diging ice in siberia.
kakobrekla: it would be prolly better to detect log url, parse it and just go after the line directly in db
usg_press_machin: It's a question of legal convention. Paying legal taxes to a legally installed government has never, ever been considered a war crime. I'll take my chances
mircea_popescu: the future is eminently unknowable. i for one am definitely going to push for hangings.
usg_press_machin: Reductio ad, not going to take the bait there.
mircea_popescu: do you know who else didn't think ?
mircea_popescu: so you don't think.
ben_vulpes: another good idea dies on the spikes of pressed shitboard
usg_press_machin: mircea_popescu yes but I don't think paying taxes to the USG - no matter what the USG does - is Nuremberg material.
mircea_popescu: there's no rule of nature that says the us can never be so identified. for those people who do make that identification, you're a criminal.
kakobrekla: there are ways to execute js w/o a browser but that is kinda silly.
mircea_popescu: usg_press_machin but anyway, a secondary point to your " obeying the law and paying taxes?" is that if you happen to be obeying the "laws" of a terrorist organisation and giving it money, you may end up in hot water with a lot of people.
ben_vulpes: kakobrekla: if the js that highlights the line also alters the title node would assbot be able to read that title?
kakobrekla: ben_vulpes url hash tags dont get sent to the server.
mircea_popescu: how the fuck am i going to make gilded business cards then ?
mircea_popescu: ahahaah that';s right. submerged altogether!
mircea_popescu: "A proper approach to key management. This could be anything from centralized key management as in Apple's iMessage -- which would still be better than nothing -- to a decentralized (but still usable) approach like the one offered by Signal or OTR. Whatever the solution, in order to achieve mass deployment, keys need to be made much more manageable or else submerged from the user altogether."
ben_vulpes: now if !s stuff defaulted to ignoring bots as well...
mircea_popescu: "(Let's not get into the NSA's collect-it-all policy for encrypted messages. If the NSA is your adversary just forget about PGP.)" << best part :D
ben_vulpes: or if there are less retarded ways to accomplish same
ben_vulpes: kakobrekla: dunno if you're into this sort of thing but if you grabbed the logline in question with the same js that does the highlighting and slammed it into <title></title> would it show up for assbot to read directly into the chan?
mircea_popescu: please get me some anti-eyeroll tape i might strain something.
mircea_popescu: yeah, THAT is the solution. keybase.
decimation: I would agree with his point that the pgp protocol is complex, but I suspect that anything that tries to solve the same problems will have similar complexity
mircea_popescu: "The lack of transparent key management in PGP isn't unfixable. For those who don't trust Google or Yahoo, there are experimental systems like Keybase.io that attempt to tie keys to user identities."
ben_vulpes: "plz for to plaintext"
ben_vulpes: mircea_popescu: tell me about it i had a dev send me an ssh key in a fancy attachment the other day
mircea_popescu: by now i can sorta distinguish the noobs from the veterans because the noobs send me gpg blobs with "Content-Type: multipart/mixed;" mixed in, whereas the veterans just neatly paste the pgp in the email body. ☟︎
BingoBoingo: <decimation> but mircea_popescu, you are leaving out the masses << Is that what you want the oncologist to do?
mircea_popescu: as if you know, plaintext mail isn't end to end encrypted. why not ? i do it all the time.
BingoBoingo: mircea_popescu: And they completely forget that if you NEED end to end encryption... A key exchange is happening privately nomatter what yahoo or Gmaul's shit insists on
mircea_popescu: ben_vulpes omfg check that out
decimation: but mircea_popescu, you are leaving out the masses
mircea_popescu: worst time to be stupid in the history of the world.
mircea_popescu: BingoBoingo it's so lulzy, the crap these people publish. "o i hate pgp, it's too secure, pls to use centrally distributed keys, so much lightyears better"
decimation: the fact that he says that the cryptography is old (and therefore bad) pretty much explains his cryptographic chops
assbot: certificate transparency for PGP? | discrete blogarithm
BingoBoingo: And a follow up talking around problems https://zyan.scripts.mit.edu/blog/certificate-transparency-for-pgp/
mircea_popescu: "It's time for PGP to die. " sez author.
assbot: A Few Thoughts on Cryptographic Engineering: What's the matter with PGP?
mircea_popescu: asciilifeform and here's one for you : http://blog.cryptographyengineering.com/2014/08/whats-matter-with-pgp.html jeez im on a roll today.
decimation: bitcoin has already gone to the moon, some of the world hasn't figured that out yet
mircea_popescu: and no, people don't "shape it" in that sense.
BingoBoingo: usg_press_machin: There's at least 800 different alternatives to your two presented options and there are 796 of those alternatives are compatible with at least one other option. GO! Math!
decimation: bitcoin doesn't need anyone to have an opinion or thought about it in order to exist
usg_press_machin: What's your view on it then? I'm openminded.
mircea_popescu: usg_press_machin if you read the logs, you've seen how well this entire "try and force mp into our preconceived headboxes" worked before.
assbot: Venture Capitalists Get Paid Well to Lose Money - Diane Mulcahy - Harvard Business Review
mircea_popescu: ;;later tell mike_c here's a good one for you : http://blogs.hbr.org/2014/08/venture-capitalists-get-paid-well-to-lose-money/ (Yet 2013 annual industry performance data from Cambridge Associates shows that venture capital continues to underperform the S&P 500, NASDAQ and Russell 2000.)
usg_press_machin: if you're into it to fight the state, then go for it, I can respect that viewpoint.
usg_press_machin: If you're into it to go to the moon - mass adoption (hence legal frameworks) are key
usg_press_machin: But this is the thing with my question about asking why you're into bitcoin.
mircea_popescu: there is definitely something wrong if trying to present that as anything but fucking weird.
usg_press_machin: So what's wrong with doing bitcoin while... say, obeying the law and paying taxes?
BingoBoingo: I guess it's time to trade paper ATC IOU's (maybe joking?)
atcbot: [CoinMiner Hashrate]: 0.03 TH/s [PityThePool Hashrate]: 0.00 GH/s
mircea_popescu: bitcoin is a normal function of the adult mind, like writing, or like fucking. you're not into these for anything other than you know, being an adult, being alive, doing the things that there are.
mircea_popescu: to quote an old timer, "i have no idea, [you] just wandered in here one day and started talking"
mircea_popescu: maybe, i guess, on like the 3rd or so meta level.
usg_press_machin: What do you want Bitcoin to achieve?
mircea_popescu: bycicling isn;t a functon of people who can't ride bikes either. do you want more people to ride bykes ?
mircea_popescu: i don't care if they do.
usg_press_machin: Maybe. But the question is, do you want the derps to use it at all