log☇︎
625700+ entries in 0.397s
moriarty: asciilifeform, sure, and then you get the philosophical stances behind strong vs weak typing, how many passes would you like your compilation to occur, how about parallelism for that matter, etc
mircea_popescu: wil redirect anyone trying to do so in the future.
assbot: The irc world is a big but very flat place. pe Trilema - Un blog de Mircea Popescu.
mircea_popescu: http://trilema.com/2014/the-irc-world-is-a-big-but-very-flat-place/ << if anyone feels like arguing the ethics/moral question, i'm all ears.
asciilifeform: moriarty: all of these devices are quite the same from the standpoint of, e.g., 1970s hardware architect (in whose time there were actually multiple cpu paradigms in use)
bounce: so make a new fancy box that does lisp from the ground up.
moriarty: the very basics of comparative languages as one of the electives or course modules in CS will inform anyone that the history of language development was in response to advances in hardware, but at the same time, paradigms from ages before still come into play today at various points in the hardware spectrum, if no longer on your desktop, then at least on your mobile devices which are
asciilifeform: (re: smbx) must say that some things absolutely must be experienced to be understood. i went to considerable lengths to actually obtain the machine before i dared to write about it at any great length.
moriarty: whenever someone makes a comment like last programming language, it's a giveaway sign they have no formal education in CS
moriarty: that's the fallacy of homeschooling
asciilifeform: (entire thread recommended)
asciilifeform: mircea_popescu, others : http://scottlocklin.wordpress.com/2012/09/12/not-all-programmers-alike/#comment-3728 << smbx for the impatient.
moriarty: you can get some sort of clue based on the amount of money in the system, and the flow rate
moriarty: we know we shouldn't do it, but we do it anyway :) and if you can partition the market into the emotional plays, and the bot plays, you can then expect to tailor your response accordingly
moriarty: fear drives the sells at the lows
moriarty: greed drives the buys at the highs
moriarty: without any training, the basic market participant buys at the high and sells at the low, despite being cognisant of the mantra to the contrary
moriarty: the constraints of the market is at its most basic, everybody is driven by greed and fear
moriarty: you may act individually, but your response to feedback from the market constraints that individuality, and as a whole, the market acts very mechanistically, well, if you can pin it down of course
moriarty: same it is with anything else, even in the markets
moriarty: they may amble along seemingly individualistic paths but the feedback arising from interaction with other criss-crossing of paths result in a very predictable wave
moriarty: think crowd behaviour as they exit a museum
moriarty: individual automatons act in ways that coherently reinforce into a distinct pattern
asciilifeform: e.g., a crowd of simple 'visual basic' bots each playing arbitrage and programmed with a 'stop-loss' threshold
asciilifeform: there is no 'populist stance', there is a set of finite automata
moriarty: asciilifeform, how's that?
moriarty: that's what i did when i tried to profit off bitcoin
asciilifeform: moriarty: fundamentally broken model here though
moriarty: if you have a good perception of what will be the populist stance, then you can make a trading move to optimise your profits in response
moriarty: it's all about grasping the mindset of the mainstream, and then harvesting that to your advantage
moriarty: heh asciilifeform brought up a good point on trading though
bounce: hmno. you're mistaking your peers keeping you down with the humility needed to climb up by yourself
asciilifeform: one being - this - http://imgur.com/cHWju2Y
asciilifeform: of course, this can end in several distinct ways.
asciilifeform: too often 'lose the smug arrogance' is when pig says to man 'you think you're too good to eat shit with us, you bugger'
bounce: lose the smug arrogance and you know what to look for to improve yourself
moriarty: bounce, this calls for a good ol' http://xkcd.com/610/
bounce: apropos earlier point, you need the idiots though. how else are you going to know you're not?
asciilifeform: xmj: in this particular space, the 'bigger system' often consists of a horde of idiots operating small systems.
moriarty: asciilifeform, a lot of the bugs arise typically not from the main objectives by the side-work in getting simple I/O right, etc, a lot of which can really be templated
asciilifeform: xmj: more fun - ferret out simplistic bots and rape them.
moriarty: asciilifeform, i see the points made there, make it high level enough that you don't need to get bogged down by the side-work in the midst of pursuing your main objectives
bounce: to some snazzy beasty boys tune
xmj: that's arbitrage to you
asciilifeform: if 'buy cheap, sell dear' is state-of-the-art, then yes, anyone can write bot.
asciilifeform always wonders, on first meeting a trading bot enthusiast, whether he considers basic game theory and contemplates counterpoint rape-bot answers to his strategies.
daybyter: I want to create a framework to build on.
moriarty: daybyter, and of course i assume a full-fledged basic mathematical suite to support doing whatever i want to the model
moriarty: daybyter, i'm thinking in terms of interest rates, manufacturing activity, GDP delta, CPI, retail sales, etc
daybyter: I actually never trading ema crossing, or so.
moriarty: daybyter, interesting, i was thinking of perhaps less specific but at the same time more atomic than simple moving averages
asciilifeform: moriarty: the 'support of the community' - that is, mainstream 'programmer culture' - is pure intellectual poison. the farther from it - the better.
moriarty: asciilifeform, all the things one takes for granted, the support from community at large is non-existent in a corporate setting :) so what was trivial in popular languages had to be polished up, e.g. good documentation and example codes
moriarty: asciilifeform, to be fair it was somewhat of an adjustment coming from the open world of academia and studenthood into proprietary work
moriarty: asciilifeform, that makes perfect sense
decimation: (he used the u so you would understand)
asciilifeform: moriarty: when you pay $1m for a 'q' license, etc. you are buying out of having to carry out this labour.
assbot: Formal definition of a trading language
asciilifeform: moriarty: in point of fact, any serious industrial use of a lisp proceeds by first creating just such a language for the system in question, and then programming in it.
moriarty: daybyter, so what we ended up doing was using proprietary languages that allow us to atomically describe market conditions with ease
moriarty: daybyter, unfortunately Lisp or Prolog is not high level enough for financial trading
daybyter: I think I could use jscheme, too.
daybyter: I tried drools.
moriarty: daybyter, yes i have tried doing so
moriarty: and i must say that the beauty of functional languages is that you get to attain that rare accomplishment of writing a bug-free code in the first round
nubbins`: sweet, fresh OS X install and my keys survived the round trip
daybyter: Are you using lisp/prolog for trading stuff?
moriarty: the simplicity of your code, balanced against the length of time it took you to write it
moriarty: asciilifeform, sure, Prolog works the same way too :)
asciilifeform: moriarty - lisp on x86 pc is 'lisp' in much the same way 'holy roman empire' is the roman empire.
asciilifeform has been writing an entire blog on the subject, since '07, and doesn't see the need to continue pasting it here...
moriarty: i'm not for Prolog, so it doesn't matter to me
moriarty: asciilifeform, this is devolving into an advocacy debate :)
assbot: Loper OS » The Simplest Lisp Machine
asciilifeform: (what's a lisp? my treatment of subject - http://www.loper-os.org/?p=405 )
asciilifeform: both of these are quite their own animals, and most users would make a face if you called it 'a lisp' - but they are as much 'a lisp' as newton and leibniz both had the 'calculus.'
asciilifeform: bounce: Forth is an example of 'lisp' re-invented by an outsider. there is another example - 'refal'. (soviet)
asciilifeform: http://unqualified-reservations.blogspot.com/2007/07/my-navrozov-moments.html << linked from above, mr mold's explanation (written presumably before the chumpatron re-swallowed him, this time - for good.) ☟︎
asciilifeform: http://www.loper-os.org/?p=1390 << by popular demand of readers, explanation of what is the scam, and why.
bounce: what, type theory?
moriarty: Haskell certainly lacks in that department though it makes up for it with purity, monads
asciilifeform: functional << nope. the non-homoiconic languages - do not make it possible.
asciilifeform: moriarty: rather, it is about the kind of interaction with the machine that it makes possible.
bounce: what's the cost of cooking up a chip or two these days?
moriarty: with respect to AI
mircea_popescu: so about 1/7000 the recent involvement in the middle east ?
moriarty: what are the advantages of lisp over haskell for instance?
asciilifeform: one famous treatise on subject: http://www.sts.tu-harburg.de/~r.f.moeller/symbolics-info/Symbolics.pdf
mircea_popescu: asciilifeform topmost figure ? 1mn ? 1bn ?
asciilifeform: mircea_popescu: the death of smbx corp. is almost an entire field of scholarship..
mircea_popescu: bounce it is a strange argument on the face, but perhaps the idea is such a hard problem can only be conveniently breached at this angle. much like satellites aren't launched from tiera del fuego
decimation: (a common model for technical companies with any defense contracts)
mircea_popescu: how much did they actually spend ?
asciilifeform: mircea_popescu: had industrial utility (one of largest customers - 'american express') - but - smbx spent $maxint on r&d, relied on usg to pay for this.
asciilifeform: moriarty: no. went to uni, ordinary 'cs', but vomited from 'ai' courses.
moriarty: asciilifeform, fair enough, still if you've formally undertaken AI as a major, that's something
mircea_popescu: so the idea is, the tool required (os/stack/machine) has no industrial utility and without convincing the industry it needs ai to sponsor the thing, there's never going to be either ?
assbot: Loper OS » Kalman Reti, the Last Symbolics Developer, Speaks of Lisp Machines.
asciilifeform: mircea_popescu: to understand, it is necessary to see it. e.g., http://www.loper-os.org/?p=932
mircea_popescu: asciilifeform seems a weak reason tbh. i mean, there are good lisp implementations today, or not ?