log☇︎
53700+ entries in 0.522s
asciilifeform: mircea_popescu: is it merely my puny brain, but i still don't grasp the 'signed-default is bad because preet can steal a key.' if preet gets a hold of my key, he may as well have put a bullet through my hide, stuffed the corpse, and proceeded to live on as it
asciilifeform: mircea_popescu: earlier link concerned my working hypothesis as to why.
assbot: Logged on 09-07-2014 00:04:59; asciilifeform: pierce << ideal example of the animal described on one of mircea_popescu's essays - he could be packed into prison for life, any time, based on what's in his file. so he does as instructed.
artifexd: asciilifeform: That is my desire as well
asciilifeform: i, for one, would much prefer to have there be not the slightest chance that a fuckwit claiming to speak as me, but sans my key, can be believed
mircea_popescu: artifexd well, dunbar's number as a general rule.
artifexd: Sign whatever you want. As long as the timestamp is recent.
mircea_popescu: the helo as it is contains some signed material.
asciilifeform: it could be my final message as boat goes down.
artifexd: As a currently running gossipd, if I get a connection request with "I'm bob. Here's proof", then I accept the connection and add that ip address to my list for that key. (For later connecting to him)
mircea_popescu: artifexd this could also work, as a handshakey sort of thing, sure.
asciilifeform: in no small part because i cannot really picture my impalement or reprieve as hinging on attribution of what i've said
mircea_popescu: since we're fixing ircd, might as well actually do it.
asciilifeform: naggum had a piece where he confessed to thinking of 'open source' as a weapon, purpose-built for the destruction of a particular evil (microshit) ☟︎
mircea_popescu: asciilifeform that's a subplot i dun wanna enter into now - this is complex enough as it is - but suffice to say i am persuaded such situations are thermodynamiocally bound to narrow timespaces.
asciilifeform gets a distinct impression that mircea_popescu is still thinking of the adversary as being bound by laws, courts, procedures of evidence-gathering.
artifexd: How many connections to other servers do you imagine that you will have? You as in you mircea_popescu.
mircea_popescu: as far as it's in the form "either you or A X" the only answer is "i don't care."
asciilifeform: let's work out, using spec as given in mircea_popescu's article: what does an inquisitor know about a particular utterance
mircea_popescu: not with the spec as given, imo.
mircea_popescu: which is exactly how speech has functioned, since the dawn of time, to create what is known as the free world.
asciilifeform: as i reckon, same degree as the unsigned-message scenario
mircea_popescu: artifexd suppose you don't reg your name, and someone comes in as artifexd and says things. should you be forced somehow to say if this is the case or not ?
asciilifeform: we thus have a degree of deniability, about the same as in the case of no messages carrying signatures
asciilifeform: explicitly proclaimed as 'not his own'
asciilifeform: imho it is far from a sure thing that this will so much as add one drop of sweat to a usg inquisitor's work
asciilifeform: the only possible solution to preet signing as asciilifeform, or mircea_popescu, or whoever, is to pull the pin when he comes uninvited.
mircea_popescu: there is no such thing as "sign for friends" outside of the model detailed in my spec.
artifexd: The system would, without your interference, label the things I say and the things your artifex say as said by seperate entities.
artifexd: Nothing I, as artifexd with my key, say will ever show up as said by the same entity as whatever you say with your artifex key.
mircea_popescu: if i get a fake key of you and sign it... it's good as far as the computer is concerned.
artifexd: That's why the fingerprint and the alias, right? Let the computer notice that the numbers don't match the the numbers that I identify as mircea.
mircea_popescu: artifexd this prevention is guaranteed by design as is.
artifexd: As you have preached in the past, the identity built over time, secured by wot, has value.
artifexd: I mean as in trust the message
artifexd: Trust in this case means that, as asciilifeform said, bob(today) is bob(next month)
artifexd: Trust doesn't mean that I take bob's word as gospel.
mircea_popescu: which is EXACTLY as it is anyway
asciilifeform: you can still know that bob(today) is (or is not) same as bob(next month)
mircea_popescu: you can call bullshit in the gossipd as well.
artifexd: Actually, as fast as I type single second resolution timestamps would be enough.
asciilifeform: (i.e., just as their own live wotgraph behaves)
mircea_popescu: exactly like indicated. will exists for as long as the hand lives to enforce it
mircea_popescu: present wot would benefit immensely from some dead hand cleanning as it is.
asciilifeform: a copy of my wotgraph kept around as a message in a bottle under nitrogen in my brother's house, say, will not really carry out its function as a live reflection of my wot-will.
asciilifeform: probably quite a few folks. but the thing that distinguishes fermat from wot is that wot needs to be at least quasi-'hot' to really work as intended, imho.
mircea_popescu: but for as long as anyone gives a shit, they'll be there.
asciilifeform: under the contemplated scheme, i may as well not bother to use wot then
mircea_popescu: very theoretical possibility, as "the last words" are hard to fake online.
mircea_popescu: it's as good as current thing, except better cuz signed.
mircea_popescu: inasmuch as my old wot is still signed with my old key, and you have a copy
asciilifeform: but it stays around as a statue, for so long as nanotube remains ungassed
asciilifeform: worse yet, if the boat were to perish in honourable combat, with all hands aboard, the global state of wot shall return to as if he and the crew had never lived ?
asciilifeform: in mircea_popescu's scheme, my wot-graph exists as a bitstring that my particular node will disgorge if asked?
mircea_popescu: moreover, i wish to take this opportunity and link the important point of the "unsheathe your sword". inasmuch as people proceed on the "user objectively exists" and then try to "create anonimity" the unavoidable result is "anonimity is hard lolz".
artifexd: There is not. I took that as an oversight.
mircea_popescu: each server maintains his wot ratings, and theyt are sent out as part of hello procedure
asciilifeform: (wot operations still need to be signed, as well as 'hello' session negotiations.)
asciilifeform: mircea_popescu: complicates your design a bit, as now you have two classes of message
asciilifeform: the notion of 'trustworthiness' as a scalar is fundamental to scamatrons of all stripes. ☟︎
mircea_popescu: as assbot's usage over timne has shown
mircea_popescu: the current implementation favours what is fundamewntally an erroneous view of thew wot as "one thing". it is not one thing.
asciilifeform: only if it, as it does presently, lives in just one specially-designated temple
mircea_popescu: thjere is no such thing as "one" wot.
asciilifeform: this apparatus of yours is not merely ircd with new coat of paint. it is a very different animal mathematically, as you lot will soon realize.
asciilifeform: why not allow a node to store as much history as he wishes to expend on disk
mircea_popescu: the messages should be kept around for a short interval (hour ?) while the user can retain them as long as he wants.
asciilifeform: mircea_popescu: your site is down as seen from my perch
asciilifeform: so it may as well apply to everything.
asciilifeform: BingoBoingo: but even the public 'state of the art' was an israeli phone, successfully delivered to intended decapitee, which functioned as intended for a few minutes and then detonated on command.
mircea_popescu: but it's for as in, "i am doing in the name of x, ie, for x"
asciilifeform: not even usg as such, needed for this. the crapware folks will readily latch on to anything like a solution to what ails them - which proposed apparatus is; and the antivirus folks will immediately proceed to piss out whatever fluids they can muster, against the problem
artifexd: Fountain codes, insomuch as I don't understand them, complicate the design. Padding the the structure that gets encrypted doesn't.
artifexd: As far as traffic analysis goes, as long as all of the transmissions are opaque noise (because they are encrypted) and are of constant size, analysis is impossible.
asciilifeform: not as such, imho
kakobrekla: >As you well observe, this thing is in fact Bitcoin without the shared public ledger (kept instead as a virtual private ledger by each node).
asciilifeform: as well as the actual punishments.
asciilifeform: as late as 18th c. actually.
mircea_popescu: such as, in medieval times punishment lists were put out in the marketplace.
asciilifeform also points out that, as written, apparatus is also meant to replace the classical 'wot'
mircea_popescu: artifexd it's supposed to replace ircd as a secure, fast and reliable means to communicate directly with others.
asciilifeform: muh_buttcoins: i'm genuinely curious as to why you would like to learn the answer to that question
asciilifeform: mircea_popescu: and works, about as well as russian-english (which is to say, very threadbare)
mircea_popescu: otherwise, it's as good as the argument that "my horse doesn't need to eat"
mircea_popescu: otherwise, miner farms are actually pretty stretched as it is, financially.
asciilifeform: the miners in the sealed mine will mine on body fat for as long as they can.
mircea_popescu: jurov that 99% figure is mostly a joke. look at the exchanges as they are, think what even a 50k wall would do at say 30 usd per. how exactly are thjose 99% of miners going to finance operations for a week when their block reward is worth ~750 bux ?
Apocalyptic: kakobrekla, as in you doubt the outcome will be in favour of b-a ?
punkman: "There will not be another release cycle after Atheme 7.2. We encourage the community to fork Atheme and choose the most suitable forks to drive IRC forward. To this end, we will maintain Atheme 7.2 as a suitable base for forking until October 31, 2015, with all services terminating on October 31, 2016."
mircea_popescu: punkman forward secrecy is a one on one affair, mostly. the salt is supposed to implement as much as it's possible, and the lack of signatures.
rithm: 7000 would be more in line as a "standard" irc port with security
asciilifeform believes that the scheme as originally described is disastrously mistaken
mircea_popescu: might as well mine the wall.
mircea_popescu: well no, switching doesn't. but mining in the dead chain takes as many resources as you're willing to throw at it.
mircea_popescu: for as long as there's one miner that doesn't, however...
mircea_popescu: <kakobrekla> as far as i understand sibert now runs paper fund << kinda my understanding as well. but hey, if his customers are happy with it...
kakobrekla: as far as i understand sibert now runs paper fund
asciilifeform: just as in hydraulic fracturing, foreign substance is pumped into the earth to liberate the goods,
Apocalyptic: they will be resupplied as long as derps have money I fear
mircea_popescu: meanwhile gay men have for one thing five to ten times as many legit other gay men to meet, and looser dudes make up "men going alone" clubs instead of deciding they're now gay and the gay community must turn itself into mcdonalds to accomodate them.