log☇︎
495300+ entries in 0.303s
mircea_popescu: tbh i suspect he uses this as a motivator,
mike_c: so work on your own goddamn boat with the confidence you won't end up on the street.
mike_c: but the safety net is still there. regardless of that, you could get a high paying job in software. just not one you want.
ascii_field: most of the pharma folks closed down r&d entirely.
ascii_field: mircea_popescu: why do you suppose i'm not there
mircea_popescu: sheeet, they even took bugpowder in.
mircea_popescu: you have any fucking idea how desperate those guys are ?
mircea_popescu: incidentally : if your boat breask "by itself" nudge nudge grin grin, you can go back to biochem.
ascii_field: but they're the kind of folks with offspring, mortgages, etc.
ascii_field: i think
ascii_field: mircea_popescu: the other fella lost his key
mircea_popescu: the sluts are not gonna fuck themselves.
mircea_popescu: ascii_field btw, how about you get them personal friends in the wot and start a something.
mike_c: idk.. you are looking for a very specialized type of job. I don't think you'll get far complaining there aren't a lot of them.
mircea_popescu: for your peace of mind : the last time a mast broke off in a storm the year was 1715.
ascii_field: and if mast breaks off in the storm
mike_c: see, i told you it was a money pit.
mike_c: it sounds like you've got the job you want. so what's the problem? you need more jobs?
ascii_field: i'm afraid that i cannot say more without breaking oath to the personal friends for whom i carry out this work.
mircea_popescu: like invention of tools to make aeroplanes safer in 1915
mircea_popescu: ascii_field your problem is that you're premarket in that.
ascii_field: but invention of tools to speed up the process
mircea_popescu: recall trhe $100 top prize.
ascii_field: the fact that most of what i do is not brute labour
ascii_field: mircea_popescu: it will make more sense if i reveal that
mircea_popescu: and i understand WHY they hire the way they do, with contests etc.
mircea_popescu: except he doesn't want tyo compete with the 16yos those guys hire.
mike_c: seems also flavors of this job would be present at security firms.
mircea_popescu: why is this counterintuitive ?
mircea_popescu: ascii_field so this would be in demand either a) by the nsa or else b) independent work a la s.nsa ☟︎
mircea_popescu: ascii_field "here's this binary, find out what it does" ?
mike_c: ok, so this is.. a circuit board?
ascii_field: or, more related to my current gig, 'we have yyyyyy and wish to know why it was made, by whom, what it does, it fell out of flying saucer'
mircea_popescu: which did you mean ? and neither of these are programmers.
ben_vulpes: ascii_field: doesn't want to "work". he wants to "think".
ascii_field: mike_c: 'we have xxxxx and have not the slightest idea what to do about it'
ascii_field: i can say quite securely that no one at 'google' is employed in this capacity.
mike_c: what's an example of a problem you would be asked to solve in this position.
mike_c: so be clear about the position you are looking for that doesn't exist?
mircea_popescu: can't quite pin down wtf this is.
mircea_popescu: mike_c it's very dissonant for me because he seems to come from this place where exactly the opposite of what i see is true. backwards world of alf.
ascii_field: mike_c: entirely not the profession i was speaking of.
mike_c: you could walk into google tomorrow and command an absurd salary
mircea_popescu: mike_c i thought so too.
ascii_field: but so narrowly tight to the extent that the practitioners have lost all negotiating leverage.
mike_c: i don't understand. maybe you are saying there is no demand for exactly what you want to do? there is plenty of demand for smart programmers.
mircea_popescu: no, not because of that at all.
mircea_popescu: this simply reflects stuff discussed all over trilema. why would it not be.
ascii_field: because of the sheer pressure of orcs at the gate and the paucity of the positions
mircea_popescu: ascii_field that there is no serious demand for highly skilled computerizers
ascii_field: let's narrow down -which- particular thing mircea_popescu is unconvinced by, before i answer
mircea_popescu: chetty ^ give the foregoing a read would you.
mircea_popescu: i must say im still broadly unconvinced by the entire thing.
mircea_popescu: in any case, this would present excellent cause to disallow acces of women trying to appear *as women* in this field. either they learn how to be men or learn to live without participating in technology.
ascii_field: evolutionary pressure knows how to lead to two places
mircea_popescu: if women have it, and "do what i mean" and "i should be safe whether im naked drunk or not", then yes, semiskilled shanonizers in microsoft garb everywhere.
mircea_popescu: if a company can either secure its network or lose its ass... then the professional will be in demand.
ascii_field: same as the 'wriggleys gum' and plastification of industry
mircea_popescu: if this is true, which i still doubt but perhaps just as an artefact of my limied circle, then the pill is simply destruction of the legal protections.
mircea_popescu: i suppose to the degree this phenomenon exists, it is driven by the feminization of the internet (the sort of retarded behaviour illustrated by that comment i quoted earlier).
ascii_field: (not sure if the phenomenon is presently discussed under than name, or discussed at all for that matter. but it does have a name.)
ascii_field: don't take my word for it.
mircea_popescu: i am unconvinced. there must be more to it.
ascii_field: for the reason which i tried to explain last night
ascii_field: i cited that thing merely because it is a compact statement of essentials of naggumism.
mircea_popescu: meanwhile, this seems untrue ?
mircea_popescu: is this true btw ? i am sensing this trendwhere people go "real professionals are not in demand"
ascii_field: mircea_popescu: feel free to recycle it into your next mega-article if you feel like
mircea_popescu: my point is softer than that. specifically, it is that simply having put this there would not have tarnished your blog, but been smart an' convenient.
ascii_field: mircea_popescu: don't get me wrong, i shall write again. and yes - for the archaeologists, as before. but presently cut among 1) dayjob 2) s.nsa 3) sleep,eat,...,write
mircea_popescu: just put it there so it can be found conveniently and forget about it.
mircea_popescu: whjat the fuck difference does it make to the book how many read it?
ascii_field: (in case this was not clear, the ru original was not mine, and was found by accident)
mircea_popescu: dude, let's burn the library of alexandria because nobody ever read it. i bet that's how it actually went down.
ascii_field: and i blogged about more or less same thing for 7+ yrs, to no effect
ascii_field: it's just a fscking translation
mircea_popescu: ascii_field you know you really should blog/link these things. srsly.
ascii_field: related fields - they are no longer in demand today. Therefore there is not much choice: sign for your supper by the latrine [ru prison parlance - transl. note] or silently rot in full consciousness of your total bankruptcy and futility of existence.'
ascii_field: Yes, once upon a time, the "programmer" was a serious engineering profession with a shade of elite status. In those years, genuine mastery of certain technologies was demanded from him, and this was not attainable by all. Whereas today any Downs-syntrome-autist can call himself a programmer, because he has mastered the basics of redneck-coding and will work for food. As for genuine professionals - like in many other
ascii_field: thoughts concerning the futility of his existence begin to intrude upon him, of futility; old complexes sharpen, and flower into a full-blown psychological crisis...
ascii_field: Or what remains - the other variant - to dive into the common flow of the sewers, and take hold of a passing piece of shit and feed upon it for the rest of one's pathetic life. Some are satisfied with this, just as many are satisfied with the profession of the prostitute, the cleaner of latrines, a waiter in MacDuck, etc. But a more or less normal person begins to experience breakage in his value system, worldview;
ascii_field: The apprehension of one's inadequacy begins, of the futility of one's existence, the principal impossibility of fulfilling one's idiotic desires. But there is always a choice. If the first variant prevails, he will press on with self-improvement, the study of genuinely worthy technologies, on which there can be foundations for the creation of something better. And he will understand that no one needs him as a smart-arse.
ascii_field: But the pathetic parody of a human does not grasp that it is not enough to have a cock's crest bachelor degree or to spoodge out a few pages of code at an olympiad, to become a programmer. In the course of this revelation, the lame abortus, reject of evolution, slowly begins to comprehend that the world is very much not as he imagined it.
ascii_field: 'But what, specifically, remains for the poor students and wankers, who took up the notion that there is such a profession - "programmer" ? Yes, there is, but not in the sense that these larval untermenschen conceive of it. Some see in this role something just short of the demiurge, crafting the future; others see a good way to set up their life, secure their future, a stable income and career growth.
ascii_field: --- translation. mega-paste warning ----
mircea_popescu: certainly wasn't the last time this was tried.
mircea_popescu: the entire "we're obeying the law because the law produces foodstamps" and "keeps the terrorists at bay" doesn't really look too functional at any rate.
mircea_popescu: could as well obey this law as any other, and in the end none at all.
mircea_popescu: why would anyone obey the law ? it says nothing about their beliefs, it fails to make the world meaningful.
mircea_popescu: then it lost gender. it's teetering, and i don't think it's any longer sustainable at all.
mircea_popescu: it lost that pillar of support. but it reconstructed some sort of balance around the remainder.
mircea_popescu: see, law is in and of itself meaningless and powerless. if it reflects deeply held societal beliefs, it is powerful. which is why it was powerful in the old christian days, pre 1000 ad.
Chillum: What I mean is that just as the religion of two people is irrelevant for marriage in the eyes of the law, so should be gender
mircea_popescu: yes, it shouldn't inconveniently oppress. but that does NOT mean it should not oppress at all. tho i see how that mistake is easy to make.
mircea_popescu: once law ceases to be an instrument of convenient social oppression, it ceases to matter.
Chillum: I think that law should not consider "gender" at all, leave it as a social construct
mircea_popescu: http://33.media.tumblr.com/cecc3c213c49633eba86ba638a56c311/tumblr_my65023EFp1s5egydo1_400.gif << this is like, THE picture of fucking societal decay. chick's having a lulzfit at guy who's too absorbed in gadget to do anything.
mircea_popescu: nowadays redneck simply means "someone who doesn't think transexuals have a special gender and gay marriage is a thing"
mircea_popescu: perfect word this. "dude, stop with the bydlokodinga!" "did someone bydlokodinga libnss ?"
mircea_popescu: moreover, i hold actual whores in higher regard than most other professions. certainly i give social precedence to a whore over a us college professor.