log☇︎
493800+ entries in 0.33s
trinque: my comment was sarcastic; I'm sure there are those at MIT that can manage a lightbulb
mircea_popescu: well... "danger to himself and others"...
mircea_popescu: mats how's the mit grad dangerous ?
mats: trinque: underestimating dangerous people is how clever folks get killed all the time.
ben_vulpes: "Regular expressions cannot respect a language's syntax (detect false positives short a full parser)" << this strikes me as a special case of the "cannot simulate a universe without a universe" claim. ☟︎
mircea_popescu: but anyway, moocs are made for the wiki generation of broken heads, and a necessary outgrowth from the brokedness baked in the pseudo-encyclopedism.
ben_vulpes: eerie parallel to the "disqualifying bad teachers" thread.
mircea_popescu: the kid who wants to go "in all directions" just ends up making wall pizza
mircea_popescu: this is of course silly, in the abstract. in practice, it's the only way to have research, by cutting paths out of the unknown.
mircea_popescu: the scientific method exists to provide support for research BY DENYING RESEARCH. that's all it does : marks wide swaths of perfectly valid human inquiry with a tar brush reading "STUPID SHIT WE DONT CARE LALALA"
trinque: mats: the US is literally idiocracy throughout
mircea_popescu: for that matter, another important hook is the scientific method. (kuhn's book on the topic is absolutely required here, and really it's 100 pages or some shit.)
ben_vulpes: ask them to wire a lightbulb up
mats: i'm headed out in a bit to check out some MIT exhibits
mircea_popescu: take enough of these you will never ever know anything.
mircea_popescu: he's been introduced to not ever knowing chemistry.
mircea_popescu: which brings us back to my point : tourist in kenya is not more knowledgeable on "the country of africa" than obama. guy that went through "mooc introduction to chemistry" has NOT been introduced to chemistry.
mircea_popescu: travel is not tourism. travel is when you have pregnancy scares with local women that do not speak your language.
mircea_popescu: gabriel_laddel if you wish the path analogy, moocs are like tourists : they go "to a foreign country", spend their time between local mcdonalds and local starbucks in the "idiot foreigners" quarter.
mircea_popescu: mats nice spring here too, which means cooler o.O and for some reason they call spring autumn.
mircea_popescu: for a learner to learn it, it's not enough for chemistry to "be".
mircea_popescu: this can not be fixed by making the path itself different. it is outside the path. yes chemistry is the same.
mircea_popescu: same must be provided for you elsewhere for your learning to be a path.
mircea_popescu: in abstract fields, no gravity to be your cruel mistress.
mircea_popescu: irl, there exists such a thing as gravity. you can't float broadly over a path. gravity pushes you down into it.
gabriel_laddel: One should be able to pick up a computer and learn
gabriel_laddel: While I think that the whole submitting to a teacher thing is important in some cases, we have 100ks of people running through e.g., introductory chemistry courses. There are only so many paths to walk.
mircea_popescu: see, THAT is fundamental. what you're describing is not fundamental in any sense, but merely technical. which may be whats' wrong with them, for that matter
mircea_popescu: in those cases where they exist.
gabriel_laddel: (well, one that I learned from)
mircea_popescu: becoming something in the style of wikipedia : a great way to batten down the ignorance of users. after a mooc they're just as ignorant as before, but now it's much harder to fix.
gabriel_laddel: I've never had a formal teacher.
mircea_popescu: in trying to insulate the learner from the hot core of education (the rape), moocs succeed in educating the learner from education altogether,
mircea_popescu: they purport to be learner-driven. this is as idiotic as it gets. education works in the following stages : learner picks a teacher TO SUBMIT TO, blindly. teacher rapes the learner. this is education.
gabriel_laddel: Let's say that you sign up for a course. You cannot possibly learn anything interesting because they've got to execute all code in the browser, or barring that, you're aping youtube videos.
mircea_popescu: alternatively, i could tell you what's fundamentally broken with them :
mircea_popescu: and show me right here, at that.
mircea_popescu: gabriel_laddel show, don't tell.
mircea_popescu: appalling completion rate, but fuck their mothers.
gabriel_laddel: Completion rate is really irrelevent, the problem is that they've created this new "format" and books are still superior.
mircea_popescu: i don't see how it matters. a school which takes 100 7yos, produces 86 dead 18 yos and 14 sane 18yos is best school.
mircea_popescu: in the "completion rate" sense, esp if ill defined, b-a is a failure.
mircea_popescu: seems besides the point, but no and yes.
gabriel_laddel: mircea_popescu: or seen their completion rates?
gabriel_laddel: mircea_popescu: have you tried to use one?
mircea_popescu: gabriel_laddel "MOOCS (massively open online courses and the like) have failed due to fundamental issues with their technical perspective - a perspective shared by nearly the entire fiat world. New frontiers have opened, Masamune provides a technical foundation for mission critical programmes of the future."
mircea_popescu: the nj dudes were just wasps, an irrelevant, far removed margin of the idiocy pie.
mircea_popescu: asciilifeform if you wish to blame someone for the new jersey approach, blame constantine. it is HIS fault he stopped throwing idiots to the lions.
mircea_popescu: because yeah, totally, good-evil duality, most important thing that happened. was tom cruise in that ?
gabriel_laddel: It is the good sword. However in the game I stole the reference from - it was the sword of the villain.
mircea_popescu: funny that all the west knows of a millennium of craftsmanship perfection and perhaps the matrix for all human accomplishment is "but which was the bad one".
mircea_popescu: was masamune the "good" sword or the bad sword ?
gabriel_laddel: anyways, that is confusing and I'll update it
gabriel_laddel: unless I give someone the direct link, as in here they'll only see it from that code path.
ben_vulpes: i think it's a note for people reading via the repository browser
mircea_popescu: mebbe i dun understand teh terminologies.
mircea_popescu: ;;later tell gabriel_laddel "If you're reading this on github there is a more attractive HTML version here." but "here" IS on github. subdomain.gutrot.io
assbot: Successfully added a rating of 1 for gabriel_laddel with note: http://gabriel-laddel.github.io/arsttep.html http://gabriel-laddel.github.io/system.html so basically this asshole once decided he'll eat an exercise ball.
assbot: A Realistic Solution to the Education Problem (DRAFT) ... ( http://bit.ly/1ykf3Js )
mircea_popescu: !rate gabriel_laddel 1 http://gabriel-laddel.github.io/arsttep.html http://gabriel-laddel.github.io/system.html so basically this asshole once decided he'll eat an exercise ball.
trinque: ben_vulpes: it's still all out there
ben_vulpes: is the dust getting collected?
trinque: easy to verify whether it did too
trinque: not saying the old one didn't work, just wasn't my work
mircea_popescu: no need for a knote. who knowsn knowsn and who doesn't know better go suck some cocks to find out.
mircea_popescu: craftsman allowed to put a history mark in there, <hr /> is quite reasoanble actually.
ben_vulpes: at the same time...it's la serenissima's list of deeds. the notary in question is somewhat irrelevant.
assbot: Logged on 11-04-2015 08:35:04; gabriel_laddel: I've made little to no progress on the codebase recently short of cleaning it up and ensuring that if, for some reason I'm interrupted, that someone else will be able to pick up where I left off if necessary. The sources, coupled with http://gabriel-laddel.github.io/arsttep.html provide enough detail for one to know what I have in mind and why. http://gabriel-laddel.github.io/system.html provides an
ben_vulpes: if you want to, deliniate with an <hr /> and a note.
trinque: I just didn't run the old one, so was going to maybe mark these as having come from the old thing
mircea_popescu: remember ? people can spend the dust ? so you or anyone knows what address proves any claim ?
mircea_popescu: and that is constructed procedurally, for a reason
mircea_popescu: the address they COME FROM dun matter, just the address they GO TO
assbot: Logged on 11-04-2015 08:35:04; gabriel_laddel: I've made little to no progress on the codebase recently short of cleaning it up and ensuring that if, for some reason I'm interrupted, that someone else will be able to pick up where I left off if necessary. The sources, coupled with http://gabriel-laddel.github.io/arsttep.html provide enough detail for one to know what I have in mind and why. http://gabriel-laddel.github.io/system.html provides an
trinque: ben_vulpes: strictly speaking it's not, except to answer the question "were these supposed to come from a different address?"
ben_vulpes: why is the "from" address necessary?
mircea_popescu: i don't get why you'd do anythin other than a db import
ben_vulpes: did the encoding of deed bundle -> addr hash change between your and punkman's versions of the thing?
trinque: I'll just add a "from" address column, which is always the same for new bundles, but will be the old address for these
ben_vulpes: more rows at the bottom of the table, with block, addr and bundle.
mircea_popescu: yeah, they were published in certain blocks, you/re not re-deeding them
trinque: I am aware of that
trinque: publish them like they're new docs, and put an additional doc in there saying "hey here are the original txns for these"
trinque: ben_vulpes: I could just make another deed with the original transaction data too
mats: is there a direct equivalent for docview in vim?
ben_vulpes: do you think it'd be adequate to publish the block, the address and the bundle in the same table on deedbot.org?
trinque: arguably this is the first time this deedbot has seen any of these docs, so I don't think it makes sense to use old transactions as the timestamp
ben_vulpes: well the embedding transactions already went out
ben_vulpes: buuh you and his popescuity have a better handle on the thing
trinque: is that what's desired, or should I involve the old transactions somehow
trinque: ben_vulpes: as I understand it I'll just take the old deeds and re-bundle them?
trinque: doing some work atm but I'll make sure that happens this afternoon
trinque: ben_vulpes: yeah I have time today
ben_vulpes: it's be stellar to have them in place before con3.
ben_vulpes: ey trinque, d'you have time to get the legacy deeds in this weekend?
ben_vulpes: bigger deal than the declaration of sovereignty.
gabriel_laddel: nope, do tell
trinque: regendering << what a time to be alive
gabriel_laddel: I'm not saying that it will happen, merely planning for the unlikely
ben_vulpes: the most that'll happen is that you'll get patches regendering the codebase. ☟︎