log☇︎
492200+ entries in 0.325s
trinque: I'll take a bunker
asciilifeform: (if you want to be considered, my understanding is - be young and female) ☟︎
trinque: felipelalli: "this guy that uses these handles scammed me; here's the transaction on the blockchain, blah blah"
williamdunne: trinque: I was mindfucked for the past 12 months or so, but I didn't dive in and read blogs etc first
felipelalli: trinque: it's true! deedbot solves the blacklist problem, I think.
asciilifeform: that is: not being able to move to the flying sand castle quite yet.
trinque: asciilifeform: I was utterly mindfucked for the majority of the time I first spent here
asciilifeform: methinks felipelalli is expressing the traditional frustration of the 3 to 6 month n00b to #b-a: ☟︎
trinque: the point when saying something about a person of obvious identity is identifying the *author*, not him
trinque: felipelalli: if you want to say something about your president, put it in the deedbot
decimation: I mean, your friends in the flesh
felipelalli: trinque: not everyone, but at least the important people to me.
trinque: that world may never have everyone in the WoT
felipelalli: decimation: you're right. But would be so cool and useful if I really could use WoT to things in day to day and not only in dreams. ☟︎
assbot: Your pain reliever may also be diminishing your joy | News Room - The Ohio State University ... ( http://bit.ly/1IYRPbU )
decimation: felipelalli: understand that the 'us community' doesn't 'move to here' either
felipelalli: but it would be at least funny. I'd rate the president of Brazil, the "mirror" user "twitter-dilmabr" as -10 as "scammer!" for example.
asciilifeform: what if the "derivated mirrored user" was just an ID of a social network like Facebook or Twitter? Before strike me, let me explain my motivation: << what if the 'derivated mirror food' was just a turd from the local public toilet, with spices such as mustard or ketchup? Before strike me, let me explain...
mats: the br community doesn't deserve or want to be here, so don't bother
mats: interfacing the real WoT with some federated, poorly implemented imitation is a recipe for disaster
felipelalli: trinque: I know that. I am trying to convince the Brazilian community move to here, but it is being hard. The main community is still on Facebook. ☟︎
trinque: felipelalli: the WoT *is* the social network
assbot: Project Zero: A Tale of Two Exploits ... ( http://bit.ly/1IYQOR3 )
felipelalli: asciilifeform: in the car I was thinking about a solution and I think I found it: what if the "derivated mirrored user" was just an ID of a social network like Facebook or Twitter? Before strike me, let me explain my motivation:
decimation: and then they steal your "you were stole from"
williamdunne: But they don't just deprive you of your livelihood, they also strip you of your reputation and in many cases remove your ability to defend it.
trinque: decimation: now they deprive you of your livelihood before you ever reach the courthouse
trinque: makes me think of assembling someone's L1 to judge him someday
decimation: assessment on oath of reputable men of the neighbourhood."
decimation: nope. as the magna carta says: "For a trivial offence, a free man shall be fined only in proportion to the degree of his offence, and for a serious offence correspondingly, but not so heavily as to deprive him of his livelihood. In the same way, a merchant shall be spared his merchandise, and a husbandman the implements of his husbandry, if they fall upon the mercy of a royal court. None of these fines shall be imposed except by the
asciilifeform: medieval juries also did not concern themselves with day-to-day idiocies. ☟︎
assbot: Jury trial - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia ... ( http://bit.ly/1O8DKdp )
decimation: as 'la wik' says: "Medieval juries were self-informing, in that individuals were chosen as jurors because they either knew the parties and the facts, or they had the duty to discover them. This spared the government the cost of fact-finding" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jury_trial#cite_ref-14
decimation: williamdunne: exactly, presumably the point of the jury was that they were able to judge the credibility of the witnesses because they knew them
felipelalli: well, thanks asciilifeform trinque decimation and williamdunne - I have to go take my wife, bye!
decimation: felipelalli: that's a fact for a jury to decide upon
felipelalli: decimation: I said injustice in the meaning of someone uses a fake ID to blacklist someone unduly, just that.
williamdunne: The judge, the jury, and the exucutioner
williamdunne: A group of people you don't know without the full information deciding whether or not to lock you in a cage?
decimation: or at least, the facts
decimation: what's a jury trial other than having your wot judge your actions? ☟︎
trinque: neither wots, cops or gods can prevent the former, and the latter's easier to do with a WoT
trinque: if I take a big shit in every business deal I'm ever a part of, I'll either outsmart everyone and win, or the shit's going to catch up to me
felipelalli: asciilifeform: I am convinced the idea is broken at the point where you can not identify someone accurately. This could easily lead to injustice. But I will try more mature the idea. williamdunne raises a good point: if you follow the WoT, maybe someone is "good" or "trustful" to identify others.
asciilifeform: in much the same way, you cannot extract trustworthiness from the aether ☟︎
trinque: I mean... this is no different than life
asciilifeform: which attempts to extract energy from nothing
trinque: there are societal benefits to maintaining good rating
asciilifeform: this entire thread concerns something as ill-conceived as perpetuum mobile
williamdunne: asciilifeform: That was the point I made;)
asciilifeform: williamdunne: Who verifies the WoT? << no one but -you-, the user. and your experiences.
trinque: maybe someday you must maintain over a certain rating to deal in certain spheres of influence ☟︎
williamdunne: This is about stopping them from moving on
williamdunne: Indeed, but they move on
trinque: and as they are found out they are buried in negrate
williamdunne: I'm not saying its a good idea, I just think its interesting as an idea ☟︎
williamdunne: trinque: The idea is that people can do reputation exit-scams because they can just move on to new idents
trinque: your connections on the wot and your ratings, and your pubkey *are* you
trinque: what's the point of the ID verification aside from gpg and the wot?
williamdunne: Who verifies the WoT? You just ignore those you don't trust
decimation: note that historically passports were used to keep people from leaving
asciilifeform: ditto any other passport or traditional document of identity.
trinque: who stores this data
asciilifeform: williamdunne: no one can verify a u.s. passport (the folks who can - won't. because they are our enemies.)
asciilifeform: it is, to use the ancient term of art, 'fractally wrong'
asciilifeform: the idea is a crock of shit at the most fundamental possible level.
asciilifeform: felipelalli, williamdunne: fella who stole, e.g., 'mtgox' db can do anything the 'legit' passport owners could do.
trinque: it's social behavior that shouldn't be policed centrally.
trinque: also should people find you using many alternate IDs, they can negrate all of them knowing this
trinque: the incentive to use one identity is that your cred builds upon that name
trinque: it's akin to hoping no one ever lies again
felipelalli: can be impossible, indeed. I didn't mature the idea. Maybe it is true: it could be impossible.
williamdunne: It should be possible to make it more expensive to do so
trinque: felipelalli: the tool to apply is a WoT, but you can't force people to identify only once
felipelalli: the only flaw in this idea is that there is no reliable way to identify someone only. I understand that. But if there were, could be very useful to create blacklists. Especially in Brazil where there are many scammers that exposes all of your personal life, and we know their real names, their documents etc.
williamdunne: asciilifeform: I think he is really just looking for a way to make sure that each person only carries one identity, and the best way he can think of is a passport
asciilifeform: if only it could somehow be gotten to in a 'fair' way, etc
asciilifeform: felipelalli: you are labouring under the presumption that the ultimate arbiter of truth is that piece of paper
asciilifeform: whereas today it means, to many, 'what he is called by usg'
felipelalli: asciilifeform: ahaha no, that is not the point. Maybe you didn't understand my initial motivation for that.
trinque: not easy to clean; going to need the powerful stuff
trinque: ^ what I put as the headful of shit
asciilifeform: felipelalli is still labouring under the burden of his old religion.
felipelalli: trinque: yes, this is the fail asciilifeformci rises with reason.
trinque: or whatever inputs create that identity hash thing
asciilifeform: felipelalli: is it unclear to you why i have no reason whatsoever to add or subtract to my belief that this is your name, from hearing this ?
trinque: felipelalli: so then I lie about my name when I deal with you
asciilifeform: felipelalli: one not-inaccurate way to think about 'cipherpunkian' systems such as bitcoin or wot is as attempts to emulate a kind of incorruptible god ☟︎☟︎
felipelalli: trinque: a "mirror derivated user" like br-8d255152 (deriveted from my doc) would be useful only as "INPUT". There is no output from br-8d255152. This is useful for make a blacklist of scammers that don't use OTC. It could be derivated from my full name, for example: "Felipe Micaroni Lalli"= br-89402f8d
trinque: felipelalli: an observation about myself: cleaning out a headfull of shit takes time.
asciilifeform: felipelalli: so who issues the passports you were suggesting making use of ? god ?
felipelalli: trinque: the "doc number" is just a way to identify a user globally, but could be another thing.
asciilifeform: reading the logs; reading sites such as mircea_popescu's; same as you and i did
trinque: meaning no offense to felipelalli, he seems to not realize that his reverence for said govt official who names and numbers the people is a mystical belief
trinque: say a fool staggers in and he wants to learn; where to even begin?
trinque: asciilifeform: hard to grasp how incorrectly one's been taught
asciilifeform: sadly, i suspect that even a thousand threads like this one will not suffice in hammering the point home to the thickest ☟︎
asciilifeform: trinque: this is a valuable thread - to illustrate the absurdity of even considering anything other than key as a reliable identity
asciilifeform: and the former divide into folks with write-access, and folks without.
asciilifeform: there are folks with access to u.s. state dept. db, and folks without.