log☇︎
446600+ entries in 0.276s
ben_vulpes: trivial patch to apply for anyone who's vested. ☟︎
ascii_field favours 3 and stated this some time ago
ben_vulpes: 3 say "fu this shit is wrong and stupid", set version to $maxint
ben_vulpes: 2 be stealthy, advertise whatever "version" is "current" with the shitgnomes
ben_vulpes: imho there are 3 things to be done
ascii_field: ben_vulpes: i brought up this point before. asked mircea_popescu why we insist on making it so easy for gavinists to wall off our net from the rubes. iirc mircea_popescu said 'fuck them all'
ben_vulpes: mircea_popescu: it doesn't make a practical difference, but it pins a pointless magic variable at its "infinity" value, in the zero, one infinity mapping.
mircea_popescu: if you mined and set the block version to maxint it might.
ben_vulpes: why advertise version instead of just responding to network messages?
ben_vulpes: i actually think setting version to $maxint is a pretty great idea.
ben_vulpes: <ascii_field> also i verified that if version constant is set to 99999, https://getaddr.bitnodes.io agrees to see the node. unless someone gives a fuck, i will set it back to 0.5.4-beta later today << eeeheuhe
ascii_field: mircea_popescu: it was intended to work as you stated above
mircea_popescu: how the fuck we ended up with this situation where diff machiens have unequal times is beyond me
ascii_field: also i verified that if version constant is set to 99999, https://getaddr.bitnodes.io agrees to see the node. unless someone gives a fuck, i will set it back to 0.5.4-beta later today
mircea_popescu: ascii_field i have nfi why unixtime "locales" are implemented so braindamagedly anyway. all machines should have the same exact integer for time. then if you wish to localize it, localize it on top of that ☟︎☟︎
ascii_field: and this, turns out, moved epoch time!
ascii_field: but since i refuse to run ntp on the box, i ended up setting date manually when i was given it
kakobrekla: >A timestamp is accepted as valid if it is greater than the median timestamp of previous 11 blocks, and less than the network-adjusted time + 2 hours. "Network-adjusted time" is the median of the timestamps returned by all nodes connected to you.
ascii_field: kakobrekla: theoretically, epoch time is 'one for all of us, like victory'
kakobrekla: 'your_epoch' is 'network-adjusted time' isnt it
ascii_field: amazing that it ever worked
ascii_field: had to check by hand
ascii_field: i knew the basic fact of. but given as the box displayed correct wall time, did not think of it
ben_vulpes: node has been wedged for more than a lunch iirc
mircea_popescu: ascii_field i could have told you that
ascii_field: if |your_epoch - block_epoch| > 2hour then lose
ben_vulpes: jesus shit. we'll have to run our own ntp cluster next.
ben_vulpes: blee. so block validation relies on some absolute coordinated time?
ascii_field: but what this means is that no, the thing won't correct for clock offset
ascii_field: i had the box set to my local time instead of gmt
ben_vulpes: is this a direct result of headers only mining?
ben_vulpes: https://github.com/extempore/real-bitcoin/blob/6af2c99ad7cf02f95aa650262dea0057051f13cd/src/main.cpp#L1347 << this?
ascii_field: the epoch thing
ascii_field: (not the umd box. though betcha it belongs to the umd scamlab)
ascii_field: in other news, give my regards to http://dreyfus.umiacs.umd.edu
ascii_field: ;;later tell mircea_popescu turns out it was the epoch time
ben_vulpes: jurov: there's a bit more than that. did you read my subsequent link?
ascii_field: ben_vulpes: i do not yet know the answer to this
ben_vulpes: ascii_field: are blocks from headers-only miners coming out with timestamps too far in the future?
hdbuck: hello mircea_popescu, just passing by to say thx for the rating
ben_vulpes: ;;later tell pete_dushenski whaddaya know about this glynn-ward character? ☟︎
ben_vulpes: ^^ the wot at work. ridiculous numbers aside, we tell stories of heroic deeds performed in service of the papers we sign.
ben_vulpes: "Oh, well, I had the contract, and I had to fill it!" And that was all he said.
ben_vulpes: So it was that C. B. returned to Hazelton afoot, limping into the hotel one snowy night in midwinter, "broke to the wide", but otherwise unconcerned.
ben_vulpes: another to feed the rest, they weakend and died on the trail.
ben_vulpes: Again he started out, this time with a hundred and twenty-eight dogs, and when he came to the place where he had turned back, he was able to feed the dogs on dead horse-meat, and so get through to the cabin where to two men were waiting. But on the return trip, the going was heavy and slow and he found that the worlves had reached the cache of horse-meat and finished it up, so the dogs were short of food and though he killed one after
assbot: culubas: Timejacking & Bitcoin ... ( http://bit.ly/1JJPzK3 )
ben_vulpes: Those supplies had to be delivered to the men patiently waiting for them at the far end of the trail, So he cached the supplies, hoiseted as many carcases of the dead horses as possible into trees where the wolves could not get them, and went all the way back to Hazelton to get dog-teams.
ben_vulpes: Every now and then a horse would miss its footing and go over, sometimes into the rushing river below, to be lost forever. Then it froze, and the going was hopeless. One by one the horses slipped and went down until it was impossible to go onward. C. B. shrugged his shoulders and altered his plans.
ben_vulpes: all next day and the following night without any let-up.
ben_vulpes: So C. B. at once set off north again witha pack-train of sixty-eight horses. He had no very great hope of being able to make his destination before the hard weather came on, but he traveled with all the speed possible, to get over the worst places on the trail before ths first snow fell. But as ill-luck would have it, it began to snow one night just as he came to the rock ledges where the going was bad at the best of times. It snowed
ben_vulpes: supplied -- and it was getting late in the autumn.
ben_vulpes: Story has it that he returned to Hazelton, once, after a trip up the Telegraph Trail, and there he found out that he had missed the farthest cabin of all, over two hundred miles away, and there were two men up there left without supplies for the winter. Either the Government had not made the tale of the cabins clear or C. B. himself had miscalculated. However that may have been, the plain fact remained that these two men had to be ☟︎
kakobrekla: >you won't gain much by lying to your peers since your block won't be
ben_vulpes: ascii_field: fascinating! what gears are failing to mesh here?
ascii_field: kakobrekla: ^ if there were no record of the early blocks - then yes
ben_vulpes: The little Jap who, laughing up and down his sleeve goes cheerfully about his business in a gas-boat up the coast, or picks out the best small-fruit land in the country; the ubiquitous Chinaman, steadily cornering all the loose cash in the land -- of a surety these two know more of British Columbia than most white men!
kakobrekla: generate one year's worth of hashes. < isnt this one year actually 10 min ?
kakobrekla: >but I can't fake the hashing power it needs to
ben_vulpes: The Americans come, with plenty of money, and stay at the much-advertised hotels, gulping down the Rockies in predigested doses, thenrace through in a Pullman car to the next big hotel on the coast. And how can they know anything of the province?
ascii_field: so i'm nearly certain that the timestamp ~2h epoch time window is the reason for wedged 0.5.x nodes, at this point
ben_vulpes: halls, about "great open spaces" and "the need for a population." But they know nothing of the real British Columbia.
ben_vulpes: "The English come out and travel through, knowing all about everything beforehand, as the English always do; and, having set standards, they compare the Fraser to the Thames (former too wide) and the Selkirks to the Cotswolds (former too high). They get out to spend a day or so at Lake Louise or Jasper, then get into the train again and stay there till they reach Vancouver. Then they go back to England and give vague lectures in town
ascii_field: ^ re: block timestamping
ben_vulpes: mircea_popescu: if you liked clements tall tales, you might get a kick out of Glynn-Ward's "Glamour of British Columbia"
ascii_field: anyone who sees a 'martian' version number from nosuchlabs public node, please don't be alarmed. running an experiment today, to determine whether we are being corralled by gavinists using advertised version constant
ascii_field: (for the exact instruction set supported, see the marvell datasheet posted ~6 mo. ago.)
ascii_field: i recommend using that
ascii_field: the buildroot gives you the complete toolchain you need, independently from that of the box you're on
assbot: Logged on 06-07-2015 17:37:21; trinque: anyone know offhand if armv5tel-softfloat is the appropriate arch for pogo?
trinque: trying to get some repeatable builds going for arm
trinque: *cross-compiling, that is
trinque: I tried building stator with arm-linux-gnueabi and it segfaults on the pogo
ben_vulpes: trinque: is that info missing from asciilifeform's post to the ml?
ben_vulpes: does anyone know at a high level how nginx does the "swap binary while running" trick?
trinque: anyone know offhand if armv5tel-softfloat is the appropriate arch for pogo? ☟︎
ben_vulpes is late to the party. again.
ascii_field: they just happen to write turdware for usg.
ascii_field: gotta also love the clean, well-commented (italian!) cpp
ascii_field: gotta love how the morons had their private keys thrown to the wind
ben_vulpes: take your myip flag - is that automagically a .conf file option as well?
mats: ain't the net a grand place?
assbot: Logged on 06-07-2015 12:15:59; mircea_popescu: not unless you get amir taaki to "open source" it.
ascii_field: ben_vulpes: this one is behind a nat atm
ascii_field: in other nyooz, my portable test node is synced.
ben_vulpes: excellent long term cost reduction strategy imho
assbot: Log In - The New York Times ... ( http://bit.ly/1KH9CsN )
ben_vulpes: http://www.nytimes.com/2015/07/06/science/colorados-push-against-teenage-pregnancies-is-a-startling-success.html << I don't know why the conservatives with all their hate for welfare programs aren't pro-free-contraception
punkman: ascii_field: not sure what you mean with "but not move the local epoch time"
ascii_field: seems like logical thing to do would be to accept the block but not move the local epoch time if the block's time is an outlier ?
punkman: ascii_field:rejects too far in the future because it wants to keep "network time" within some bounds
assbot: Logged on 06-07-2015 15:03:54; mircea_popescu: asciilifeform of course, if phuctor is this starved for io, would it be a good idea to move that thing to ssd ? maybe even raid ?
ascii_field: http://log.bitcoin-assets.com/?date=06-07-2015#1189379 << not sure if it's solely disk, or also net, as of this moment. and simply getting 2nd box may be more cost-effective. ☝︎
assbot: Logged on 06-07-2015 15:03:24; mircea_popescu: danielpbarron ideally take them apart and send them as parts he says
ascii_field: http://log.bitcoin-assets.com/?date=06-07-2015#1189377 << don't lose the steel plate that sits under the pcb - it's the only heatsink ☝︎
assbot: Logged on 06-07-2015 16:20:00; punkman: ben_vulpes: network needs to know how long it's been in human time since last retarget
ascii_field: http://log.bitcoin-assets.com/?date=06-07-2015#1189407 << probably should've been more specific - why does it matter if timestamp is 'too far in future' ? ☝︎
kakobrekla: speed is a function of time and distance, so you need to know how much time has passed in the 2016 blocks, right?
punkman: ben_vulpes: network needs to know how long it's been in human time since last retarget ☟︎
jurov: ben_vulpes: yes it is, but also time elapsed