45000+ entries in 0.502s

mod6: im testing the wrong fucking scalar in my condition :
< mircea_popescu:
<jurov> and my other question about maintaining A and A' in "mempool" ?
<< everything is in the mempool al ltime anyway.
mod6:
<+mircea_popescu> mod6 why is your v perl implementation named v0001.pl on ml instead of a saner v99996 ?
<< weird? where do you see that?
mircea_popescu: jurov> so, was anything worked out yet between turdatron and deedbot?
<< not so far.
assbot: Logged on 31-01-2016 04:36:34; mircea_popescu:
<pete_dushenski> mircea_popescu: it's sorta incredible that the fiatists who need infinite growth all want to cut their own throats with reduced consumption while tmsr~, who doesn't want anything to do with infinite growth, is buying and consuming like it's going out of style
<< actually, best estimate i can get puts TMSR GDP growth for 2015 somewhere around 450-500%. that's not 4.5-5%. it's not 45-5
mircea_popescu: "This is interesting because nowhere do they address the central engineering issue -- that a fixed p,q is not secure yet a variable one requires another RNG to seed the RNG."
<< except the part where a prng IS NOT A RNG
gribble: diametric was last seen in #bitcoin-assets 3 days, 15 hours, 41 minutes, and 4 seconds ago:
<diametric> not sure that makes it a trivial non-crime at that point.
gribble: artifexd was last seen in #bitcoin-assets 40 weeks, 5 days, 16 hours, 19 minutes, and 16 seconds ago:
<artifexd> I'm comfortable calling it a review. Not just of what it is but what it was and how it got to where it is.
BingoBoingo:
<PeterL> but Hillary has been "waiting her turn", so the party bosses are trying to get her in despite her being a horrible monster
<< THis is how the GOP sank in 2008 with the lich, and 2012 with Rommit
assbot: Logged on 02-02-2016 04:41:22; mircea_popescu: polarbeard + return error(SBLK "chain tip %s not found in the block index", hashBestChain.ToString().c_str());
<< any reason this has only one flag ?
BingoBoingo: "@HillaryClinton Shouldn't you be in jail for #WhiteWater"
<< My daily dose of social media trolling
mircea_popescu: + strError += strprintf("tx requires a tx fee of at"
<< this is logging exempt ?
mircea_popescu: + return error(SBLK "pow %s work below minimum (%u)", hash.ToString().c_str(), nBits);
<< bunches of these.
mircea_popescu: + return error(SBLK "block %s doesn't match index", GetHash().ToString().c_str());
<< it really doesn't work if you don't use the flags!
mircea_popescu: + printf(SINF SBLK "loading block index\n");
<< this should show the nStart value ; so should all these timed items. like + printf(SINF SADR "loading addresses\n");
mircea_popescu: + printf(SWAR SWAL "repairing tx version %d\n", wtx.fTimeReceivedIsTxTime);
<< any reason this lost the hash ?
mircea_popescu: + return error(SBLK "block loading from disk failed");
<< this soulds like SERR and so does + printf(SWAR SBLK "found bad block %s at height %d\n",
mircea_popescu: polarbeard + return error(SBLK "chain tip %s not found in the block index", hashBestChain.ToString().c_str());
<< any reason this has only one flag ?
☟︎ ben_vulpes now actually very curious as to how this sort of thing would work at the code level in practice. if blockheight
< forkheight, use old validation rules, else use new?
mod6: Bitcoin version 0.9.99.98
<< good
mircea_popescu: jurov> generally, wot should ignore expiration dates. like, if alf dies, we're going to throw everything out?
<< holy shit!
mircea_popescu:
<asciilifeform> 'From the court filing for his recent arrest it looks like this was a fairly clever trap set for Bridges.
<<< heh.
pete_dushenski: imagesblogs/callaway/xr16/reviewdriverwave.jpg
<< ok that's actually notbad…
assbot: Logged on 01-02-2016 23:17:36; mircea_popescu: ascii_butugychag> why the fuck provision for rewriting bits that will ~never~ be rewritten.
<<< ironically, cheaper to save on hdd than on the mask rom. yet.
fluffypony: [01:51:34]
<psztorc>The secret is that he isn't arrogant at all -- only pretending.
fluffypony: [01:51:12]
<psztorc>JackH: He does that on purpose, to manipulate the type of people who choose to read his blog.
fluffypony: [01:29:45]
<JackH>in his universe, his words are absolute - its quite funny to read
fluffypony: [01:29:21]
<JackH>he seems quite certain of himself and even writes that he refuses to accept it wont work
BingoBoingo:
<pete_dushenski> ok. now any idea why ssd's are all 2.5" ?
<< You know these things work in 3.5" and even 5.25" bays... Even work with same cables.
mircea_popescu: ascii_butugychag> why the fuck provision for rewriting bits that will ~never~ be rewritten.
<<< ironically, cheaper to save on hdd than on the mask rom. yet.
☟︎ felipelalli:
<mircea_popescu> how is a bitfield in the gpg key help you in case you die ? or lose control of the key ? neither of these are time-able events.
<< well, thank you.