444100+ entries in 0.299s
BingoBoingo: decimation: Realtive
to UTC, yes. I live about a minute in a half
to UTC's future
decimation: BingoBoingo: can you use your winding
to predict
the sunrise
BingoBoingo: <decimation> easily achieved with stopwatch and gnomon <<
This leads you
to my world, where my mechinical autowinding watch is always perfectly accurate because I declare it so
decimation: you mean modifying
the bitcoind
to accept wider windows of blocks?
decimation: or we cannot build a
trusted network of
time sources
williamdunne: From
the looks of
things, S.MPOE used
to have a
thousand BTC or so volume per day
decimation: and
there's no way around it, if actual human cannot set
decimation: well, if
that were a hard spec I would agree, need
txco or ocxo
decimation: yeah but
these aren't launching into space
decimation: I guess I just can't see 'we need
to sun'
to be a huge limitation on any human endeavour
decimation: but quite separate
than 'we depend on
time'
decimation: 'dude just
tell us how
to set our clocks'
decimation: what's
the use of 'bitcoin outside of humanity'
BingoBoingo: decimation: Astronomical
time is probelematic in
that we do not know if LizardHitler mothership can subtly
tow sun a few miles or give
the moon a push
decimation: time is absolute, space squishes and streches
to nail
to its strictures
BingoBoingo: As far as I can
tell
time does not exist other
than as a projection perpetrated by
the brain
decimation: you were
the one arguing
to ditch leap seconds
decimation: asciilifeform: how is 'mean solar day is split into
two parts; divided into 24 peices' fiat
time?
BingoBoingo: Yes, even with
the Romans fiat
time. But poerverted like now dollar fiat
time. At present still enjoy 1934 dollar fiat
time
BingoBoingo: Leapweek would purely put USG
time in
the realm of clearly fiat
time
assbot: Successfully added a rating of 1 for ben_vulpes with note: welcomed me
to #b-a
solrodar: !rate ben_vulpes 1 welcomed me
to #b-a
BingoBoingo: asciilifeform:
The
time nerds burn
the... Well QuickTrip and CVS were done so I guess WalMart
BingoBoingo: <asciilifeform> ... << i keep own
time, and usg introduces leap second. now what << How often? A minute over a century and ignoring should be fine
solrodar: it sees
their implementations but it doesn't see calls
to
them via
the virtual lookup mechanism
solrodar: they don't appear
to be in
the clang output
solrodar: the one
thing which is missing which you asked for is virtual function calls, which are only used in
the keystore base class
assbot: Logged on 08-07-2015 23:15:23; mircea_popescu: otherwise, nothing keeps you from keeping your own
time.
assbot: Logged on 08-07-2015 23:15:17; mircea_popescu: owner of node may choose
to depend on it
solrodar: yeah, it's just a list of regexes, you can change
them as you like
punkman: btw aren't all
those stacked "using namespace std;" "using namespace boost;" statements a bad idea?
solrodar: then cut out nodes with very high in-degree which appeared
to be low-level functions
solrodar: started with
the standard library
solrodar: because if you include all
the low-level functions and bignum classes and so forth in
the graph
then it'll be 10
times worse
solrodar: I'm already pulling
the graph into a script
to do some filtering
solrodar: at
this stage
the only extra effort is
to output it in sexpr format rather
than dot format
solrodar: or you just want
the data
to experiment?
solrodar: so if I provide
the graph in s-expression format with instructions, do you have any specific plan for visualizing it?
solrodar: yeah, I don't know why it doesn't always do
that
solrodar: you can get dot
to lay
the graph out from
top
to bottom rather
than left
to right, but it won't be any better
BingoBoingo: The problem is
the
thing being modeled, hence
the bounty