log☇︎
431100+ entries in 0.345s
shinohai: Now THAT would be awesomeness
danielpbarron: shinohai, funny you say that; Eulora is supposed to eventually have a MUD-style client
punkman: shinohai: they do
trinque: ShawnLeary: best thing for you is to read the logs at log.bitcoin-assets.com; you'll find many topics you may (think you) have opinions on have already been treated there, and exceptionally well.
danielpbarron: i used to have poor FPS but someone showed me what to comment out of a file to make all the superflous terrain decorations go away and that helped a lot
danielpbarron: i think even the most basic graphics card should work; it's not the most cutting edge stuff
shinohai: I don't even think I own a computer capable of playing Eulora on xD
danielpbarron: and Eulora needs no such silly currency pass-through to have access to bitcoin, as it's currency du-jour is already bitcoin
danielpbarron: we need more n00bs to gather stuff for us and to be apprentice crafters
ShawnLeary: blockchain all the things :)
danielpbarron: just read the log here
danielpbarron: but it's very interesting to me that there can be alternative tokens of exchange on the same proof-of-work
ShawnLeary: this is my first day in this channel, so will do some more reading and research on it. Do you have a link to Kingdom of Loathing?
danielpbarron: not to be taken seriously -- I don't think it will be possible to keep an exchange on the blockchain if bitcoin is to have a future
ShawnLeary: why would one want to own MEAT? to beat it? ;)
ShawnLeary: so MEAT is an asset then?
danielpbarron: on a related note, someone bought up all my shares and I haven't bothered to re-up yet
danielpbarron: i don't follow the XCP scene, i just occasionally put up buy/sell orders for my asset
ShawnLeary: is that like YACHTMONEY?
danielpbarron: heh i kinda like counterparty too
ShawnLeary: I like long walks on the beach and counterparty
jurov: is that you?
funkenstein_: danielpbarron> you tell the full node what inputs and what outputs, node says ok here's a raw tx to sign (it includes an extra output pointing at node's own addr) and now you sign and give back <-- this could work
ShawnLeary: I'm the organizer of the Jacksonville FL Bitcoin Meetup
mircea_popescu takes off to get more alcohol.
mircea_popescu: i got annoyed at the "oh noes, how could this thing that's been done since forever be done"
ascii_field: did i miss a line in the log? where did the web thing come in
mircea_popescu: anyway. it bears insistingly repeating : the internet is big. the web is a pustule on its ass.
ascii_field was not involved with this
mircea_popescu: good for you. so how did they sell datafeeds ? txn blabla ?
ascii_field used to work there
mircea_popescu: how do you think i buy pipe from tr ?
funkenstein_: loll, all the way down
kakobrekla: and .. you know where this goes
mircea_popescu: why the fuck does everyone imagine the internet = the web is beyond me.
kakobrekla: and another for that tx
danielpbarron: you tell the full node what inputs and what outputs, node says ok here's a raw tx to sign (it includes an extra output pointing at node's own addr) and now you sign and give back
kakobrekla: but then you need another tx to cover for that tx
mircea_popescu: or they could just rent vpn access like anyone ever since forever.
funkenstein_: or maybe best to keep the payment for those services in a separate tx
funkenstein_: so where does it go in the TX? is there an OP_ANYONE_CAN_RECEIVE or something for the relayers/mempool operators to put their addy in?
mircea_popescu: this thing needs 3 knobs : total ram to be made available to relayer, and min $/byte to accept.
mircea_popescu: kakobrekla that mess is good.
ascii_field: who wants to implement ?
mircea_popescu: now cache is full and to get in, either pay 10 per byte or go dangle.
mircea_popescu: you set 10 bytes aside for "mempool". 1 tx comes, has 2 bytes pays 5. goes in. brings 4 brothers.
ascii_field: so, only do this when cache is full ?
danielpbarron can imagine situations in which full node operators get paid for the service of relaying -- for example, 1) end user pays node to relay his tx and 2) miner pays node to give him the choicest high-fee paying tx's exclusively
ascii_field: and then half of who remains ?
ascii_field: mircea_popescu: does this mean that we lose half of all tx ?
mircea_popescu: this is where that problem is solved. no point also solving it somewhere else.
mircea_popescu: ascii_field again : we have a pool of X bytes. tx are allowed in only if they pay more than average fore that x. ☟︎
ascii_field: can't have a monotonic eater of these.
ascii_field: even if, on some distant tomorrow, we get this jam,
mircea_popescu: we try to make this not be different
ascii_field: relay has to sit, eat the cost of existing
mircea_popescu: yes. yes they do.
mircea_popescu: the problem is solved there. no point solving it n other places.
ascii_field: but they pay miners
mircea_popescu: which is why the idea is to have X bytes, and then allow tx in according to pay.
ascii_field: they can't have the n bytes when my machine only has K-n to offer !
mircea_popescu: but once they made it through that, they can have whatever they want.
mircea_popescu: this is the required balance to this scheme. yes, we kill all idiot children without anyu regard to the ever rising blood level on the floor or the tears of their mothers.
danielpbarron: you'd have to keep the transaction in order to remember to not include it later
mircea_popescu: tx passed the test, and is now a tx. should get something for this.
ascii_field: see, this is a 'fella walks in from the street and gets something for having a pulse' situation
mircea_popescu: and as luck usually goes, we wil lcome to regret it.
mircea_popescu: until someone in the 20% mines, it waits.
mircea_popescu: ascii_field for many reasons. such as for instance that we could see a situation where enemy controls 80% of hash and refuses to include your txn
ascii_field: let the fella who generated it, rebroadcast until it gets in
ascii_field: but i'm not certain why bitcoind must be a long-term flophouse for tx that can't find a block to sit down in for weeks
mircea_popescu: nono, "tx paying too little per byte compared to others we know"
ascii_field: mircea_popescu: that is, tx without an antecedent block in the machine
mircea_popescu: seems like an excellent error catcher, you wanna see if anything makes it that late.
ascii_field: mircea_popescu: we drop ~bastard~ tx
assbot: Logged on 31-07-2015 14:24:11; asciilifeform: go try and ddos a tier 1.
mircea_popescu: http://log.bitcoin-assets.com/?date=31-07-2015#1219299 << you somehow opt to neglect the point that this was actually done in practice. ☝︎
assbot: Logged on 31-07-2015 14:22:33; asciilifeform: re: yesterday's thread, i'm frankly surprised that mircea_popescu ~didn't~ buy the trunk line
mircea_popescu: ascii_field thinking about this... is this the thing that already drops shit txn ?
assbot: Logged on 31-07-2015 16:14:16; mircea_popescu: http://log.bitcoin-assets.com/?date=31-07-2015#1219234 << yet sick is strictly the most common, oldest and widestly still used reason to ban someone.
kakobrekla: http://log.bitcoin-assets.com/?date=31-07-2015#1219408 < if someone has herpes simplex let them be, if someone comes here saying stupid shit, that wont fly. ☝︎
ascii_field: who ever hangs for two weeks waiting for a block ?!
mircea_popescu: how about two weeks ?
mircea_popescu: ascii_field yeh. they could be legit. you don't wanna assume about the pool
mircea_popescu: i'll feel like having a lava lamp taken out of my asshole once this can finally be said. "no leaks!"
ascii_field: mircea_popescu: btw, is there any reason we oughtn't shoot any tx that's hung around in mempool for more than a few days ?
mircea_popescu: i guess you're right huh. next to last, worst.
mircea_popescu: nah, that one we know
ascii_field: (last is the one where each new block perma-swallows 300 byte of ram)
assbot: Logged on 31-07-2015 14:06:24; asciilifeform: ^ if this is not a memory leak, then i fart toyotas.
mircea_popescu: http://log.bitcoin-assets.com/?date=31-07-2015#1219247 << shit that looks like the all-elusive last leak (tm) ☝︎
assbot: Logged on 31-07-2015 13:45:16; decimation: danielpbarron: what does a 'practitioner of modern judaism' do exactly? like, they know they torah and tanakh but are too cool to follow them?
mircea_popescu: http://log.bitcoin-assets.com/?date=31-07-2015#1219237 << took the socialism part out of it, threw out the rest, are good libertards. ☝︎
jurov: well, cuz it processes only one attachment at a time and i'm too lazy to redo it to consider signatures
mircea_popescu: what is this, equality welfare world ?
mircea_popescu: jurov why the fuck would it publish anything whatsoever other than what l1 people signed is beyond me.
mircea_popescu: ascii_field [...] such as ? << been thinking of a usable packaging for your convenience since i said that.
assbot: Anonimity, or the urban versus rural dispute. on Trilema - A blog by Mircea Popescu. ... ( http://bit.ly/1MXNHv6 )
mircea_popescu: ascii_field what difference does it make ? technology pointedly makes no social difference, as per http://trilema.com/2012/anonimity-or-the-urban-versus-rural-dispute/#selection-201.223-209.0
assbot: Germany drops probe into NSA's Merkel phone-hacking • The Register ... ( http://bit.ly/1MXNEiV )