log☇︎
416000+ entries in 0.298s
assbot: Logged on 20-08-2015 23:05:51; ahmed_bodi: Occasional trader. remember trading with a few people here. lost my PGP? key so i cant auth with assbot myself anymore
asciilifeform: to the inquisitor - naturally nothing
mircea_popescu: we reject these here on a daily basis!
asciilifeform: to which you answered 'and then i say i found it on the street.'
assbot: Logged on 03-02-2015 22:35:01; asciilifeform: 'mr x, you're a registered pauper, but is that a first class air ticket you're holding? where'dyagetthat'
mircea_popescu: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-23349744 << that's in the family.
mircea_popescu: let me show you "in the family".
mircea_popescu: now suppose i "own" the same, "in the family", but my family is a bunch of poor peasants from honduras. ☟︎
assbot: "A Figure of Speech, or a Figure of Thought?" (Part 1) - an essay by Ananda K. Coomaraswamy ... ( http://bit.ly/1WLD58Y )
mircea_popescu: except this "through family" claim is documented through five different testations, and it so happens that my uncle was a picasso expert who wrote extensively of this picasso work his brother owned.
mircea_popescu: and i explain that this comes to me "through family".
mircea_popescu: suppose i have a work picasso himself signed with the title "stanislav's teapot shaped head"
asciilifeform: not certain that i do ?
mircea_popescu: asciilifeform you understand what i mean by "in the wot" in that context ?
asciilifeform: here is a 'fun experiment' - get caught somewhere in a 'civilized' country with a trunk full of gold bar
mircea_popescu: so i do not credit it nearly as much as you two seem to.
mircea_popescu: somehow never is anyone in that family someone with a registered key.
mircea_popescu: phf "passed through family" in that context is always a miserable cop out.
mircea_popescu: and they are responsible and shall hang for the decisions they didn't make.
asciilifeform: phf: yes, in the logs; a german fella
mircea_popescu: but there is no liberty outside.
mircea_popescu: understand : we have the liberty to decide tomorrow that gavin was right. or that bitcoin is stupid. or that whatever else. all this because liberty AT ALL.
asciilifeform: what does their refusal to do so make'em ?
asciilifeform: at any rate, what, the rembrandt owners couldn't sell the crap off (to usg, even. it's buying), buy btc, and send to isis?
phf: (was it in the logs, guy brings authentic X "passed through family", gets accused of stealing, because "you're poor, so can't possibly have X")
mircea_popescu: and the german uprisings during calvin before that. and so on.
mircea_popescu: and the napoleonic wars before that.
mircea_popescu: haha, someone took them off the leash. ww2 took them off the leash./
mircea_popescu: they are punishing me, see, like they punished the gold standard. in their own heads.
mircea_popescu: exactly like they go "oh, why should i read trilema if trilema says i'm broken"
asciilifeform: somebody took'em off the leash.
mircea_popescu: who went by the "why should something be a standard if what it says is, we don't get any and stfu"
mircea_popescu: gold standard was cancelled by the mass of idiots.
mircea_popescu: only i have the privilege to stand up here and say something of the kind. because i'm part of a fucking republic.
mircea_popescu: hitler could have took a stand in 1940 against antisemitism!
mircea_popescu: what, stalin couldn't turn off stupid like a tap ?
asciilifeform: what, the rembrandt owners couldn't turn inflation off like a tap ?
mircea_popescu: why do you think so ?
asciilifeform: by the architects of the sum total of extant misfortune.
mircea_popescu: not by the enemy, but by the kulaks behind enemy lines.
asciilifeform: mircea_popescu: well, yes. art is used precisely like bitcoin, but by the enemy.
mircea_popescu: so in plain point of fact "the guy would have gotten more in the alternative world" bla bla bla.
mircea_popescu: their" "dollars" to buy from mcdonalds and zara. money only means money in the hands of the people who can use it independently, and what someone with tens of millions to his name was in 1995, is what someone wit ha billion to his name today. i'd know.)
mircea_popescu: anyway, the main problem with that art ruling thing, getting back to it, is that revisionism in inflation is a bitch. specifically, that sale was in 2006, before the first bout of "quantitative easing". most art of all description sells today for 10x to 100x what it did two decades ago, simply because dollars today, and euros today, are scarcely worth 10 cents. (no, this does not mean nothing to the slaves that spend "
mircea_popescu: i suspect this is also based on not having read.
mircea_popescu: asciilifeform come to think of it - he has a deeply unwarranted sense of superiority over shaw. easily the most important thinker of the period in all the english speaking lands.
mircea_popescu: (for the younger log reader, "two-and-sixpence" is not random, but a century ago made half a crown. it is used in a sense similar to "too clever by half", because that's really what half a crown is. worse than either a whole crown or no crown at all. at least in the context of this discussion)
mircea_popescu: i meant of the orwell class.
mircea_popescu: those keep their mouth shut.
asciilifeform: idk, i saw a good number of cabbies, cooks, over there. not worked ?
mircea_popescu: everyone in this country got nothing but "trabajador" in his mouth, and no one's done an honest stitch of work since 1924
mircea_popescu: the "Worker's party" of stupid people and lazy people who figure hey, if worker's in the title above the door work does itself somehow
mircea_popescu: nbo dude, not OF COURSE TO WORK omfg,
asciilifeform: and of course to work!
mircea_popescu: how about "allergic to work".
asciilifeform: then likely allergic to germans ?
mircea_popescu: and heidegger is his own time.
asciilifeform: as a cultured man, he likely read'em. but i spoke specifically of 'his time'
asciilifeform: evola? prolly smelled too much of gestapo, triggered anaphylactic allergic shock in mr o
asciilifeform: mircea_popescu: what books and philosophy of his time ought he have reviewed instead ?
mircea_popescu: and i meant in the more homely sense, socialist-books and socialist-philosophy and what have you. not socialist-economy.
mircea_popescu: asciilifeform and btw, thinking about it - i now realise visconti, the son of the duke visconti no less, actually is the one example of resistence through culture known. his terra trema was paid for by the communist party. and in it he delivers such a trashing to the pious frauds of the communists as has never before seen.
mircea_popescu: but i meant in the more homely sense.
mircea_popescu: that part i wasnt even discussing, the "economic" side so to speak. yes, moist people are dumb and industry has no need of them, so from their perspertive industry's run by aliens. fine.
asciilifeform: the way i read him, he saw 'socialism' (in the sense of industry having a single mega-imperial owner) as a done deal, with the only question being whether the end result would have a gestapo flavour, british ponce buggery flavour, or some other
mircea_popescu: and each one thinks he invented it.
mircea_popescu: every fucking year you get at least one of the imbecile "why should i have to take an exam".
mircea_popescu: which is why i say socialism is for stupid people and the mark of their stupidity.
mircea_popescu: yes, the philosophy of a five year old.
asciilifeform: orwell, like - i suspect - a great many folks, carried out the algo where 'i want the kind of world in which i and others like me can sleep ad libitum and eat well' - and turned that into 'philosophy'
mircea_popescu: (which is why they're referred in the feminine)
asciilifeform: ergo the old thread re: why a sp4mz0r wants to 'make $ while sleep'
mircea_popescu: so it can. except the individual has the valid excuse of the sexual imperative
asciilifeform: can be extended to individual, as well.
mircea_popescu: "So perverse is mankind that every nationality prefers to be misgoverned by its own people than to be well ruled by another."
mircea_popescu: and the poor array of the marbles in his head's his problem.
mircea_popescu: a) never was this nailed, anymore than the sun rising is "nailed".
asciilifeform: but i don't see that this necessarily qualifies him as a tard. how is one to love something which is incompatible with your own existence ?
asciilifeform: at one point, iirc, he quotes the mega-liturgical 'The rich man in his castle, / The poor man at his gate, / God made them, high or lowly, / And ordered their estate.' as an example of the kind of thing that killing christianity finally nailed, and he can't bring himself to miss it
mircea_popescu: asciilifeform : ;;google trilema napier
mircea_popescu: but the cheering 5yo is still dumbn
asciilifeform: i still want to picture a 'smart orwell'
mircea_popescu: yes the bridge is falling whether 5yo cheers it on or not.
asciilifeform: what was he to do, cry over the corpse like his contemporaries? then we would not be reading!
asciilifeform: as far as i can tell, it was dead long before he learned to read and write
mircea_popescu: down with the shackles of this evil british empire of the blips which nevertheless creates the sort of people i like, even if i'm not actuaslly good enough to do anything in support. let's build utopia.
mircea_popescu: the thief also learns from the dubious mistake of having been caught.
mircea_popescu: no matter! we "learn from mistakes", ie, claim that "socialism wasn't actually tried" and try again. the same thing. this time, we're printing people.,
mircea_popescu: what, you can't just print more money and the expectation to the contrary sinks early sopcialism ?
mircea_popescu: who the hell knew EVERYTHING had a cost!
mircea_popescu: yes. because he was a socialist, which is to say an idiot, and expected socialism, which always is "externalise costs" to be able to do so forever.
asciilifeform: mircea_popescu: orwell assumed that full-scale human beings were a naturally-occurring product that could be taken for granted.
mircea_popescu: why ? why, because the redditar of 1600 thought himself blessed to "waste his life away" being a "from X's circle" at the very best. whereas the redditard of 2000 thinks his life too valuable to invest in anything. he is now a thinking man, don't you know, an intellectual - everyone's an intellectual that has computers, suddenly - and a tiny little Kitschhochadel in his own right!
mircea_popescu: instead the stuff everywhere's remarkably gross.
mircea_popescu: ver really solved, life will become simpler instead of more complex, and that the sort of pleasure one gets from finding the first primrose will loom larger than the sort of pleasure one gets from eating an ice to the tune of a Wurlitzer." thing)
mircea_popescu: incidentally, even though modern pigments and computers and what have you, we're not being deluged in fine art, as "you'd expect" (if you were say orwell or some other dumb schmuck with the If a man cannot enjoy the return of spring, why should he be happy in a labour-saving Utopia? What will he do with the leisure that the machine will give him? I have always suspected that if our economic and political problems are e
mircea_popescu: this being the only "american innovation" ?
asciilifeform: they have, after all, learned to manufacture those, back in ru.
asciilifeform: certain that the authors of the film were not this ?
mircea_popescu: it means this 27 yo man that is indistinguishable from an 11 yo girl.