415800+ entries in 0.252s

assbot: Logged on 22-08-2015 15:51:32; asciilifeform:
this makes it possible
to mechanically
trace a 'patchchain'
assbot: Logged on 22-08-2015 14:31:53; fluffypony: so 6 hours
till North Korea says
they'll retaliate
mircea_popescu: b) you farm
these and let
them age, what's
the big deal. 99% of all social media accounts are registered for
the purpose of aging and
then be used in a scam exactly like is contemplated here.
mircea_popescu: a)
twitter is a piece of shit web 2.0 item.
they are probably hacked by 4 different
teams as we speak and
they don't even known
mircea_popescu: anyway, i can't be arsed
to, but it
takes anyone five minutes
to create a
twitter accouint, link it
to a dead website and say "dear mircea popoescu" on it
mircea_popescu: lmao
twitter now sucks uisers phone number as a "security"
thijg
too ?
punkman: antonosika: was
the lost key also registered at mpex?
antonosika: That
the contract aims at
the antonosika
that you are
talking
to.
mircea_popescu: well, it's denominated in one euro increments, and i don't
think he ever had outstanding enough
to payu for even one year of college
mats: poor guy does look like he may be
the real
thing. but, no private key, no futures :/
antonosika: take
the action
that you deem plausible
antonosika: mircea_popescu: I hope you
take a good ulterior consideration until
then.
mircea_popescu: antonosika no,
that's not what it says.
the contract creates no nude obligation
to pay, which may be satisfied, and
then a separate and ulterior consideration as
to whom.
mats: how does
that make sense? you may merely be
the first
to make
the claim, and
the genuine article did not yet get around
to
taking delivery
antonosika: asciilifeform: hypothetically - as long as
there is only one suggestion, from an impostor or not, for what account
to make a payment
to AND
the contract finalises, wouldn't a future delivery contract state
that a payment should
take place?
assbot: Logged on 22-08-2015 15:41:34;
trinque: I recall discussion of removing
the
timestamps, but didn't find a conclusion
there
assbot: Logged on 22-08-2015 15:41:10;
trinque: asciilifeform: I've produced a genesis.vpatch with your instructions which is only different from yours in
terms of
timestamps. expected result?
ben_vulpes: asciilifeform: didja post a genesis.vpatch without
timestamps?
antonosika: hypothetically, as long as
there is only one suggestion for what account
to make a payment
to and
the contract finiliz
ben_vulpes: yessir, but i don't
think i implemented it correctly in my vdiff
ben_vulpes: asciilifeform: i've gotten
the diff of your and my genesis down
to
the
timestamps
mats: you can
talk
to davout, but i doubt he will deliver
to someone
that cannot prove control of
that fingerprint
mats: antonosika:
this is related
to X.EUR yes? see section 2.3b
assbot: Logged on 22-08-2015 15:59:15; asciilifeform: creating
the antipatch is likely
to require some manual manipulation.
punkman: maybe because it already had
the file
antonosika: I am antonosika fingerprint 71A1EC4E1B6C7DD853FD856C86AC5789F93ED2E7. I'll do anything
to prove it. I'm looking forward
to claim a future contract. But I do not have access
to my secret key.
mats: no bitcoin address,
think you're fucked, mate
gribble: User 'antonosika', with keyid 86AC5789F93ED2E7, fingerprint 71A1EC4E1B6C7DD853FD856C86AC5789F93ED2E7, and bitcoin address None, registered on Sat Aug 9 17:27:20 2014, last authed on
Tue Aug 26 10:21:38 2014.
http://b-otc.com/vg?nick=antonosika . Currently not authenticated.
antonosika: If I do not have access
to my backup key, and have a new comp - what proof would work
to claim
the long party as antonosika?
mircea_popescu: "i am
taking
this from you because you're
too stupid
to have it". and
they knew
this is
true, and SIGHED
THEIR RELIEF.
assbot: Nick antonosika is already
taken.
mircea_popescu: (can you actually read stuff like
that or should i provide a summary instead ?)
mircea_popescu: asciilifeform your no shortage of "sane examples" refers
to an abundance of "convenient retelliungs"
mircea_popescu: that's
the
thing.
technology is intellectually sterile.
mircea_popescu: "how do you propose
to make diff work ?" "above my pay grade chief, but here's a website with code snippets"
mircea_popescu: asciilifeform it did prevail in
the justice of
the
time, did it not.
mircea_popescu: for
the record, it's not even clear moving from bearer
to certified insturment is anti-liberty. for insmtance - hansa used
the certifierd instrument greatly, because as a merchant, giving your son a plain "pay
the bearer so much silver upon presentation of
this note in such
town" was merely an invitation
to any highwayman on route
to "please fuck
this young man in
the ass and here's
the pay for your
trouble"
☟︎☟︎