342700+ entries in 2.715s
kakobrekla: summary : the owner/developer/whatever is
a jackass
kakobrekla: dont worry people, ill have
a fix for that too.
assbot: [GLBSE] [PPT.
A] 5 @ 0.36101 = 1.8051 BTC [-]
coingenuity: i'm enjoying the gox market for my bots.... as
a whole though, people are holding their breath and it's
a little eerie to watch
coingenuity: makes me happy, i think
a lot of people are sort of paused to see what pirate's effect is
coingenuity: heh, i'm not
a customer, just
a fixture of sorts lmfao
Luceo: ;;rate w|zzy 1 Bought
a number of raffle tickets from me.
nefario: hitler never played risk when he was
a kid
nefario: he only became
a problem when he started killing OTHER countries people
boonies4u: i'm sure there's
a commodity ticker for it
assbot: Requesting data from GLBSE (might take
a while).
bitfoo: yeah, SS needs
a stock-split desperately. (hint hint smickles)
bitfoo: digging around this mysql db is
a pain
Chaaang-Noi: for
a ppt 1 is
a better number than say Pi....
Chaaang-Noi: yeah but as i pointed out im offering to buy back at 1 btc, they just have to send it to my account and email me
a btc address...
bitfoo: well, contract is
a contract
boonies4u: you can do
a lot more with
a satoshi than you can with the smallest division of USD
BTC-Mining: In the future, each of those satoshi will be worth
a fortune! : o
Chaaang-Noi: i was not too worried and its not
a big deal, but i had to respond.
assbot: [MPEX] [B.MPCD.
A] 9000 @ 0.0010088 = 9.0792 BTC [+]
smickles: that's
a lot of explaining you've done there
jcpham0: I don't consider it to
a contract i agreed upon
jcpham0: Gigavps has
a joke 10 but i really trudt giga
smickles: ;;rate pirateat40 -1 there's
a whole kerfuffle to be settled before i'd trade with him
Gladamas: ;;rate pirateat40 -2 If you don't pay your debts, what do you get?
A ruined OTC rating.
BTC-Mining: aye, I meant the rating system. Don't
a few running this can remove ratings when someone abuse the otc ratings?
smickles: nice, i'll check it out in
a few minutes after i'm BAK
smickles: well, i believe that
a customer should be grinning after an interaction with their broker :)
smickles: there's
a bid on s.dice for 0.00003000
assbot: [GLBSE] [BTCASS_BOND_A] 10 @ 0.149 = 1.49 BTC [+]
usagi: No one person is going to make
a new forum
usagi: mircea for
a new forum to work it would have to be created by
a group of people.
nefario: lack of cock doesn't make you
a woman
nefario: mircea_popescu: it's
a little more delicate than that
mircea_popescu: if they're changing from m to f i'll buy
a coupla shares
nefario: someone looking to raise funding for
a sex change
EmanuelDeOrtego: I don't think users need to be babied if they are in
a financial market where money can be lost very easily.
smickles:
a user could protect against lost keys by cleasigning another key and keeping that key supersafe
nefario: if
a user loses their key how do you prove ownership of assets on mpex?
mircea_popescu: hi nefario. please put the observations as comments there so we have
a trail.
nefario: Either the exchange itself, the public face or both may be identified at
a later date as Does in the Cartmell - Bitcoinica lawsuit.
nefario: there is no requirement of
a "licence" to hold users data
nefario: Holds personally indentifying information of users without
a license (an offense in the EU).
nefario: no account has been compromised with
a dictionary attack
assbot: [GLBSE] [NYAN.
A] 2 @ 1 = 2 BTC [-]
nefario: smickles, that link given by mircea_popescu has
a number of factual errors
BTC-Mining: If you're just restriticting to
a small group everyone agreed to join, communism works great.
BTC-Mining: communism doesn't work... I actually haven't seen any system based on common decisions and resource sharing work... Too complicate to manage. Profit drive is an excellent managing tool which doesn't require to have everything managed by the authority... It's hard to get communism to work in
a large population solely based on the willingness of each participant to actually share and
smickles: i like the idea of l2/l3 trust of the mods, and
a liberal ban policy
smickles: you want to begin this with
a max user count in mind?
smickles: copumpkin: lol, is that even
a chanel?
nanotube: just make sure you mention that it's not cumulative rating. so people don't think "oh it must be
a cumulative rating cutoff, let's shill"
mircea_popescu: i mean let's face it, you can't abstract the human hand & eye from
a matter of trust
nanotube: well, the core people would presumably not care to make
a bunch of .5btc trades with
a bunch of noobs to give them out ratings. :)
nanotube: e.g., if someone makes
a trade with me for
a 1-rating, and then creates
a bunch of shill identities who interrate each other with
a bunch of high ratings... any of those identities would still have
a maximum levelN trust from me of 1.
nanotube: mircea_popescu: if it just used cumulative wot, yes, probably will cause
a bunch of shilling. if it used web of trust paths from some already-trusted members, no.
smickles: or
a given number of current users
smickles: mircea_popescu: maybe an invite/rating hybrid, new users can only get an account if they are rated by
a current user
assbot: [GLBSE] [PPT.
A] 13 @ 0.5 = 6.5 BTC [-]
mircea_popescu: nanotube : if someone made
a forum where posting rights were conditioned on
a minimal wot rating, would you consider this detrimental to the wot integrity ?
smickles: is poluting the ratings really all that much of
a risk?
mircea_popescu: maybe btc is just not mature enough to have
a real forum ?
mircea_popescu: EmanuelDeOrtego well i could easily make
a forum, but...
EmanuelDeOrtego: mircea: Could you open up
a SMF forum for securities and speculation on polimedia? : ) It would be nice to have an escape from Bitcointalk
gribble: Error: "bc,24havg" is not
a valid command.
gribble: #9826 Sat Aug 25 13:45:41 2012 smickles BUY 244.0 mpexbtc @ 244 mpexbtc (I have
a deposit in the works, but would like to make an order now, so I'm looking for someone to float me some mpexbtc)
EskimoBob: jcpham: as
a client, sure you are.