332200+ entries in 0.096s
mircea_popescu: problem is [most] everyone in romania uses english google
mircea_popescu: this would be the definition of racism : 10 units of e + 1 unit of r is more than 0e + 100 r.
mircea_popescu: they have their own official site and everything. problem is, they don't have much english support on the web, being.. you know, a romanian language band.
mircea_popescu: then one day i use one of their lines as a title for a post, and i get the #1 spot by morning.
mircea_popescu: so there's this romanian rap band, bug mafia. it exists since the 90s, it was one of the first in the sense someone in bitcoin since 2010 is "one of the first". they're to this day the best by a very very fat margin.
mircea_popescu: "We would also let you know that a letter is also attached to your package. However, we cannot quote its content to you via E-mail for privacy reasons. We understand that the content of your package itself is a Bank Draft worth $800,000.00 USD; in FedEx we do not ship money in CASH or in CHEQUE but in Bank Drafts only."
mircea_popescu: film also has interspersed scenes of a hog eating a trabant
mircea_popescu: sends daughter to water the pole (ie, pour a bucket of water at base on old wooden pole, no cables there or anything)
mircea_popescu: great somalian film. in it there's a scene where old woman can't talk on cellphone
mircea_popescu: HeySteve don't get me wrong, i'm not laying into you personally or anything
mircea_popescu: HeySteve i tell you i dun see it. i estimate it to be worth in the 90-190 btc range. now what ?
mircea_popescu: i mean i guess the idea is that bitcoiners are so fucking rich and clueless that they have no idea what's what, so they may throw 100k btc on something worth 1% of that.
mircea_popescu: lol so gigaom is promoting coindesk ? oh how very surprising.
mircea_popescu: actually he looks like he's in trouble throughout. poor him
mircea_popescu: asciilifeform lol mike looks like he's in trouble in that 1st one
mircea_popescu: "I found myself conversing with a young criminal lawyer who will soon be marrying into the same family that I did last summer. I think this makes us laws-in-laws."
mircea_popescu: artifexd actually the controlling example is... anduck himself has a total negaitve
mircea_popescu: sadly this has to start by my translating three older romanian articles, but c'est la vie.
mircea_popescu: mkay, so i'm writing a seminal, major and epic work called "a complete theory of economics".
mircea_popescu: so numbers are your standard of objectivity, but then when i ask you <mircea_popescu> are you using "subjectivity" merely to note the fact that the numeric method does not apply ? you say no.
mircea_popescu: while outside of his reach it may well be, his master's just another guy.
mircea_popescu: you seem to be roughly in the position of the slave who says his master's will is divine in nature, because it's outside of his reach.
mircea_popescu: but you need a judgement call for the tape measure to exist in the first place.
mircea_popescu: god help us if our opinions of these subjectives do not agree.
mircea_popescu: your "done corectly" is there precisely because you too know this :
mircea_popescu: <bounce> an objective measure? a metre, standard the world over. < 1 ; <bounce> whether I take a tape measure to $derp or you do it, when done correctly we both will conclude the guy's length to be $whatever. < 2
mircea_popescu: both of these "objectively" examples you provide strictly adhere to your definition of subjectivity,
mircea_popescu: this is more akin to you using inches and me using cm.
mircea_popescu: are you using "subjectivity" merely to note the fact that the numeric method does not apply ?
mircea_popescu: if he looked to do what he felt like it could have been subjective, as a proxy for aesthetic i guess.
mircea_popescu: so inasmuch as good is done, this is optimal not subjective.