326000+ entries in 0.198s

danielpbarron: heh, also
tonight i learned
that you do not want
to squeeze a kiwi, but I have not yet ruled out muddling
danielpbarron: and
to my surprise
the quarter orange i decided
to go with is not overpowered by
the whole grapefruit or
the half lime/lemon
danielpbarron is now
trying his first attempt at a sort-of cantarina (sort-of because apparently it's supposed
to have club soda, although I'm not sure if
that's a requirement, or if a side-effect of most bars not having fresh grapefruit and use a grapefruit flavored soda instead)
adlai: danielpbarron: congratulations on getting
the round
tuit!
shinohai: I am guaranteed kinky sex
tonight when gf gets here and
tastes it.
shinohai: I was at
the liquor store and was like "Hey danielpbarron made a blog post about some drink
today, lemme
try
that!"
mircea_popescu: danielpbarron>
this having a blog
thing is pretty sweet; wish I started it sooner! << HA!
shinohai: I am
trying your drink recipe
tonight danielpbarron I
think I got everything I needed.
danielpbarron: started with
the impulse
to post something on
twatter, pasted it into a draft instead, and expanded from
there.
danielpbarron: this having a blog
thing is pretty sweet; wish I started it sooner! I got a finished article in
the hopper, and a stub still
to be fleshed out.
mircea_popescu: then one day you eat
the wrong end of a lovage leaf and holy shit you're covered in hives.
mircea_popescu: one can have zona zooster by
the pail in
the system, nothing happens
mircea_popescu: you know... we aren't using
this shit for a [number of] reasons.
trinque: mircea_popescu: I see
the malice in
the act, but am commenting on
the pervasiveness of propaganda such
that malicious acts can be projected
through many obedient, subservient nodes
mircea_popescu: nobody ever did or ever would do
this combo except deliberately and for
this reason.
assbot: Logged on 10-02-2015 03:25:08; mircea_popescu:
this is like asking wyatt earp "how do you distinguish between
the f brothers and stray dog"
trinque: most people are and have always been followers; it is
the leaders who are
the problem
mircea_popescu: asciilifeform> ~nobody wants
to admit << nobody wants
to admit except for
the guy
that's been saying it for years. yeh!
mircea_popescu: <asciilifeform> perhaps i had everything backwards << which is exactly my metapoint here. for as long as such can occur, it is CLEAR we don't have
the perimeter of
this
thing yet.
trinque: who can discern malicious actor from useful idiot in
this sea of shit
trinque: This feature is independent of --use-tor and automagically uses
Tor if available. << wahahahahaha
ben_vulpes: asciilifeform: now
that's a
thought-provoker.
BingoBoingo: Ah, but
that would be
the lesser Bingo review of Robocop. What do you
think authors are, fungible?
BingoBoingo: But did you write it up on
Trilema when you were 9?
BingoBoingo still awaits mp's
Trilema review of
the Verhoeven masterpiece Robocop
BingoBoingo: Since you submitted
this I expect you
to resumbit better
this.
BingoBoingo: I know
that's why now you gotta practiced.
BingoBoingo: shinohai: Mebbe bring an actual pathogen into
the discussion so as
to contrast
this herpajerk
mircea_popescu: yeah yeah, wanna-be
the superimaginarium/illusionist except with very bad historic research.
BingoBoingo: shinohai: It's a lulzy
thing, but it needs more of a hook
hanbot: buncha sepia-toned stage magician stuffs with
typical christopher nolan over-foreboding.
hanbot: you know, where
they got david bowie
to play
tesla.
BingoBoingo: shinohai: Rewrite with an emphasis on how stupid everyone involved in
this has
to be for
this shit
to have even been uttered.
mircea_popescu: if shit just falls on
the ground and you
try
to pretend it's art, on
the other hand...
mircea_popescu: so
that someone asking for a payment
to address x already has skin in
the game - whatever it cost him
to make
the address.
mircea_popescu: not "why is it chained liek so ?" "uhhhh... [spittle dribbling]" as is currently
the case.
mircea_popescu: at least on
this design
the problem is sanely approacheable - make address creation REASONABLY expensive, for SANE, DEFINED, PROTOCOL reasons.
assbot: Logged on 04-03-2016 21:19:30; mircea_popescu: for instance (and plox, before we run off with it - example only!) : if every
tx was defined as "only 1 input - only 1 output" and if you wanted
to make a larger payment youy'd have
to make MULTIPLE
txn,
then a)
the protocol would actually make a lot more sense, atomicity-wise and b) you wouldn't have
the problems jurov describes. because pay x
to y with fee z would exist EXACTLY one way.
BingoBoingo: shinohai:
Then just resubmit, haven't opened it yet.
shinohai: Just realized I had a misspelling in
that dpaste I sent BingoBoingo
mircea_popescu: they don't make ~fat~ gurlz here. but
they do make shorties.
mircea_popescu: if you're not picky about
tall, you can prolly have brides for
the feeding.
BingoBoingo: asciilifeform: Do
two or
three brides for a container of
thistle seed is possibru?
mircea_popescu: im not even sure I know which!
there's
too many. and
the bitch with
things like
these is you always forget one.
mircea_popescu: and derpy arguments "won" with me over
the particular brokedness of
the prototype implementation are roughly
the same value and consistency as used
toiletpaper.
mircea_popescu: i just put
that
there
to generally and pars pro
toto show
that when i say bitcoin is a steaming pile of shit, and broadly an undesigned kludge i mean very specific
things.
mircea_popescu: because unlike shitforbrainsatosi stuff,
they make sense.
mircea_popescu: (yes i'm aware
that
the above example allows no payments other
than in multiples of 50 btc for a while,
then multiples of 25, and EVENTUALLY in sasothis. MIND YOU
that
this is a feature and what you are using now a bug - da fuck do you do when
the coinbase is split up in all
the satoshis it could be ? ha ? oh, "works for you as it is" ?
ty.)
mircea_popescu: for instance (and plox, before we run off with it - example only!) : if every
tx was defined as "only 1 input - only 1 output" and if you wanted
to make a larger payment youy'd have
to make MULTIPLE
txn,
then a)
the protocol would actually make a lot more sense, atomicity-wise and b) you wouldn't have
the problems jurov describes. because pay x
to y with fee z would exist EXACTLY one way.
☟︎ assbot: Logged on 04-03-2016 21:16:20; mircea_popescu:
the problem ~MAY~ be
that bitcoin
transactions are dupe-able in
the first place, for instance.\