323800+ entries in 0.207s
BingoBoingo: asciilifeform: a kaiju is one of
those japanese monster from
the films with
the people in
the suits
mircea_popescu: what was it, cher on every channel and
the velvet fog on every radio ?
mircea_popescu: absence of cool is no cooling of absence
tho. 80s still fucking sucked.
mircea_popescu: shinohai no,
that is PRECISELY what you'll have
to worry about : her running around ON you.
mircea_popescu thought
the 80s fucking sucked.
then again, back
then hadn't seen
the 90s. 00s. 10s. etc.
mircea_popescu: asciilifeform> i can almost imagine i live in 1980. <<
the
things one yearns for
mircea_popescu: <assbot> with note:
Thinks screaming at
the dike plugs
the hole <<< wait, did i just get called a fat homosexual woman ?
shinohai: Well at least you won't have
to worry about her running around on you!
shinohai: I was actually surprised
the roof of
the
truck didn't collapse under
the weight.
shinohai: I almost felt sorry for
the cops
tasked with detaining her.
BingoBoingo: alf has boat, hanbot has dike, /me wonders what next metaphor for
the waters BTC precariously insulates from will be
nubbins` off
to smoke weed and count money
pete_dushenski off
to
train
the next generation of would-be long
track speedskaters
nubbins`: maybe
toss a few more gem insults my way about my radiant wife or
the fact
that i'm financially unencumbered and spend my days in leisure
nubbins`: he can wait for
the new deed and ignore
that one
too
nubbins`: if
that's not good enough for mp, well, bully.
nubbins`: and posted
the PGP-signed
text in chan
nubbins`: anyway, i deeded
the
thing myself earlier
trinque: this one sha256's
the bundle (all messages of
that hour separated by single \n), uses
that as privkey
danielpbarron: i
think it depends if any other deeds get bundled with it
nubbins`: that was compatible with one of
the early iterations
trinque: nubbins`: it'll fart at
the hour, upload at
the 15
danielpbarron: yes
that is what i
told you around
the
time you just linked from
the log
nubbins`: what's
the refresh on
the frontend?
trinque: danielpbarron: I will remove
the dupe
trinque: nubbins`: been about a year and a month, and I don't have any plans
to shut it down
nubbins`: i
think i last used it
three iterations ago
nubbins`: what's
the url for
the deed log again?
trinque: I would bet his key's already in
there
nubbins`: you owe me a satoshi if it feeds
the same address as mine
trinque: probably not firing off a "fuck you"
to everyone you can
think of in one conversation, l0l
danielpbarron: write a blog article, deedbot your formal accusation, say whatever ~once~ in
the log (not 20
times)
nubbins`: out of curiosity, what's
the "right way"
to go about airing my grievances?
danielpbarron: i don't like you abusing
the bots
to get around an ignore
nubbins`: hey, ya don't like
the argument, it's your choice
to
tune it out. doesn't make it invalid
danielpbarron: anyway, easy go easy come; I
think you have some valid grievances, just going about it
the wrong way
assbot: Successfully updated
the rating for nubbins` from 2
to -1 with note: for
the purpose of
turning
the spam nozzle
two clicks
towards
the off position, and in
the interest of discovering whether a lord can be silenced or not
assbot: You rated user nubbins` on 30-Jun-2014, with a rating of 2, and supplied
these additional notes: He's good for a
trade in
the 1 bitcoin range..
nubbins`: sucks about
the scammer she's shacked up with huh
nubbins`: hanbot i'll
take
that as an apology, you're probably not so bad underneath
that rough exterior
pete_dushenski: nubbins`: let's just say i coulda done long
track speed skating ;)
hanbot: anyway i'm not sure if i oughta
take jurov's rating as a wholesale endorsement. advise as ya like.
hanbot: jurov i'll be doing
that; ignoring him clears
the shit from my client but not
the nice logs, and after
two attempts
to get
the guy
to speak rather'n spew (just mine, mind you), we find
the guy figures he's my "elder" because i asked some questions about gentoo, of all
things.
nubbins`: meanwhile, MP's girl with calves
thicker
than pete's
thighs
nubbins`: ad hominem attacks: often used by people who have valid arguments and can defend
them on merit alone
mircea_popescu: this whole "nubbins,
the guy who made some funny observations"
thing is certainly punching below his weight.
mircea_popescu: but
that aside, i did mean about
the ugly broad and
the general waster attitude. who knows, maybe discovering how little credit he carries with
the people he likes and who he flattered himself into seeing as equals provides
the much needed impetuus
to make something of himself.
nubbins`: if i had a satoshi for every
time mp said "looky" when he'd lost an argument, i'd be able
to donate a
tx fee
to bitbet
☟︎ nubbins`: doubt he ever
thought his clubhouse'd end up like
this
nubbins`: for all
the good it did, being a lord and all.
mircea_popescu: looky, a republic is not a democracy no matter on what face you
turn
the democracy pebble.
jurov: if #b-a
thinks nubbins` should not have a voice, let's negrate him
jurov: mircea_popescu: well, if
the discussion got so hard now, where are all
the negrates?
nubbins`: nobody seems
to have anything meaningful
to say but me
mircea_popescu: jurov> hanbot rabbling is better
than silence <<< not really. see
the jirinovski problem. an idiot spewing makes
the discussion
that much harder for saner people with meaningful
things
to say.
nubbins`: sign
the statements, don't sign em, whatever
nubbins`: well, i guess
this is what MPEx has been reduced
to
jurov: Others who are directly involved in
the agreement may credit it.
BingoBoingo: <pete_dushenski> kyle's dad and a hot
tub or something << Kyle's dad and Randy's dad. 2nd part of 3
that includes Jew Scouts
mircea_popescu: you
think who and when decided what in a private corp is open
to your inquiry because you have
the ability
to roll your eyes ?
nubbins`: it was his right
to introduce a private expense
to
the business
jurov: Well. 1.who and when decided
to send zerofee
tx 2. how is
that evver acting in good faith?
nubbins`: where it says you can't just donate 17 btc
to
the public and expect bitbet
to pick up
the
tab?
nubbins`: quote
the whole 3.2 (h) maybe?
nubbins`: lol he selectively quoted so bad
that he got half a word at
the start.
nubbins`: it seems you need
to ask explicit, short, direct questions
to allow mp's mind
to absorb
them
mircea_popescu: "t,
that all expenses charged against BitBet will exclusively reflect expenditure in good faith resulting from
the operation of its business"
nubbins`: maybe explicitly ask about
the inputs of B: whose money? BitBet's? MP's?
mircea_popescu: i had no idea he even wants or wanted
the liability - but my guess is no, he didn't.
nubbins`: jurov ask him about
the putting a private expense on
the books! see if he dodges it! ;p
mircea_popescu: jurov contract demands unanimous agreement on dispositions of bitbet. if it's sold, say. it doesn't demand, nor has in practice been ever
the case
that its sought in all matters.