log☇︎
321000+ entries in 0.21s
mircea_popescu: even if somehow all the ducks got lined up, it needs some publicity.
ben_vulpes: also auction not the best model, lowest bidding receiver is not a particularly good idea.
ascii_field: nfi, and i have no legit reason to care.
mircea_popescu: uh wtf do you mean today lol.
ascii_field: so it is to be auctioned...
mircea_popescu: his job to make this sorta calls.
ascii_field: so if receiver decides that all bets pay properly and mircea_popescu gets a 17 btc haircut, mircea_popescu will live with this?
mircea_popescu: when a venture goes into receivership a person is named (usually by the courts) to receive all the assets, and register all the claims against it. then decide which claims are valiud, and how much they're getting.
pete_dushenski: mircea_popescu: i could probably be walked through it
ascii_field: how does that work?
mircea_popescu: ascii_field well no, you know how this sort of thing works ?
ascii_field: it has to pay back the 17 first, no?
ben_vulpes: ascii_field: for that to happen, the receiver'd have to invalidate mircea_popescu's charge.
ascii_field: mircea_popescu: unless i misread, there is no way it can fully pay out bettors
mircea_popescu: i'd really ask folk in b-a with busienss experience to seriously consider doing this. a clean close-down of a bitcoin venture would be truly an absolute first.
mircea_popescu: but let's not talk of things being moot and sad stuff like that. instead : bitbet isn't actually missing any bettor funds, the whole receiver thing could be done in a week.
ascii_field: ben_vulpes: folks have destroyed far more precious machines than bbet by elbowing 'wrong button' ☟︎
pete_dushenski: ben_vulpes: i'd open a perimutuel bet that nassim who play receiver, but i don't trust betmoooose
pete_dushenski: declined, though he did manage to leave with US$82 million … in exchange for a US$300 million mortgage. When Trump’s investors from Hong Kong cashed out more than a decade later, US$1.8 billion in profits awaited them. Thin-skinned as ever, Trump sued them."
pete_dushenski: "Moneyed folk in Hong Kong know of his phoniness, mainly because of something that happened in the early 1990s. Trump bungled a real estate deal in New York City, one that would have truly established him as a titan of America, and he needed cash fast. He came to Hong Kong looking for investors, and met them for a game of golf. They wanted to play for US$1 million a hole. Trump knew he was out of his league and
ben_vulpes: probably /also/ already disqualified for stating his opinions on the matter.
ben_vulpes: who is going to even contemplate stepping into receiver's role in this context?!
ben_vulpes: elementary questions like "wtf -- paid twice?!" are dismissed with "you just don't understand how bitcoin works".
assbot: How China Sees Trump, and what is missed ... ( http://bit.ly/1RgBAJT )
ascii_field: bird that ends up in engine could have learned something prior ?
pete_dushenski: 'teaching birds how to fly' (tm)
ascii_field: but there i go.
ascii_field: i have equally little business telling lee sedol how to play
ben_vulpes: i've been told that i have no business saying anything about bitbet's business, ascii_field.
pete_dushenski: thank goodness i've been wearing my plague mask in the bedroom of late. it brought me luck!
assbot: Logged on 13-03-2016 20:51:27; mircea_popescu: anyway, to be perfectly clear, i don't think kakobrekla did anything wrong at any juncture, nor am i privately holding anything against the man. while the outcome is miserable, i dun think there's necessarily much that could have been done to prevent it.
ben_vulpes: what fucking tragedy.
ben_vulpes: nor can you pay bettors out after yourself in the process of dissolution.
ascii_field: thing has almost greek tragedic flavour to it.
mircea_popescu: well what the fuck, i'm not leaving this in my will fee tail.
ben_vulpes: "I will simply consider the matter moot." << and keep bettor funds if no receiver steps forward? ☟︎☟︎
mircea_popescu: pete_dushenski the way start-ups usually work is that they look good, but if forcibly deflated midstride it's tears all around.
ascii_field: and actually yeah, if bbet were yielding 100btc/day or whatever, it could eat the bird in the engine and keep flying
mircea_popescu: something like that i guess.
ascii_field: aha this is sorta like a superconductor, a very small pocket of not-superconducting-no-moar leads to thermal runaway and quench and boom.
mircea_popescu: and the other is that very little actual value exists in serving this market.
ascii_field: if 10,001 orcs show up at the gates
mircea_popescu: and all sorts of costs that the fiat system eats, are not here eaten by anything.
ascii_field: any operation can take damage and run a loss
mircea_popescu: hence my comment about fragility. there are two main threads here that would-be bitcoin entrepreneurs must heed quite closely. one is that - your expense structure is not either a) in your own control or b) specificable. for as long as your business model involves bitcoin as it currently exists, you're doing the economic equivalent of linking remote dlls. ☟︎
ascii_field: this is a tank with no armour
pete_dushenski: then too broke for mpex
mircea_popescu: there was certainly a tinge of that.
pete_dushenski: this obviously couldn't strictly be true, but was a more of philosophical consideration to my mind
pete_dushenski: my two cents on 0assets was always that it was a nod towards mpex bitcoin businesses having no bounded geographic constraints. '0asset' always meant '0meatspaceasset' in my head.
mircea_popescu: anyway, to be perfectly clear, i don't think kakobrekla did anything wrong at any juncture, nor am i privately holding anything against the man. while the outcome is miserable, i dun think there's necessarily much that could have been done to prevent it. ☟︎
ascii_field: i suppose it is true that inventor never has half a clue re the long term.
mircea_popescu: i invent things by degrees and i can't always and on the button answer as to the logic of things. they go in a context. i know for a fact the arrangement make sense in 2012, but entirely hazy as to the reasoning.
ascii_field: if not him then who.
mircea_popescu: ascii_field> bbet long pre-dates my study of mircea_popescutronics, and i have nfi <<< it's not terribly clear to me either, after all these years.
ascii_field: mircea_popescu: creditors first, aha, after i asked, i remembered this
ben_vulpes: oh ffs BingoBoingo with the mythical miner cartel
jurov: unexpected expenses are different thing than irreconcilable difference between partners
ben_vulpes: the problem appears to not be "unexpected expense" but a disagreement between the founders as to the legitimacy of the expense.
ascii_field: (what if someone had stolen the server, like trilema was once stolen? or the like)
ascii_field: bbet long pre-dates my study of mircea_popescutronics, and i have nfi, was the plan that it could never incur unexpected expense ?
ascii_field: also i realized that i never learned what was the logic for 0asset operations ?
ascii_field: is this traditional? (i am not connected with any of this, merely curious how it worx) ☟︎
ascii_field: 'This line of credit carries seniority above that of shareholders and below that of bettors.' was mircea_popescu's earlier verdict, but now 'Bitbet's liabilities are currently comprised of various bills (such as the 17.94766149 BTC it owes as per this report, such as whatever fee it may owe the receiver for his trouble, and others as may arise), which are the most senior ; with the remainder to go to payouts to th
ascii_field: anyway while i expect to eventually be smashed into pieces, i do not expect anyone to actually pick any of them up. nor do i really give a damn.
mircea_popescu: course not, cuz if you're going to you're best not be seen.
ascii_field: i dun think i ever actually saw mircea_popescu pick up pieces.
ascii_field: i can more easily see mircea_popescu raising a guerilla army in nepal or the like.
mircea_popescu: so then no, mp isn't learning any ada. if mp wanted to learn ada, he would have.
ascii_field: i didn't think so.
mircea_popescu: that i'm perpetually going to pick up the pieces. i'm not.
mircea_popescu: ascii_field let me disabuse you of that notion right now.
mircea_popescu: i must say the experience has been rather sobering as to all sorts of naive assumptions as to value, wealth and economics in the bitcoin world.
assbot: The greatly anticipated BitBet (S.BBET) February 2016 Statement on Trilema - A blog by Mircea Popescu. ... ( http://bit.ly/1phuhuR )
ascii_field: eventually either the lizards will move, or mircea_popescu will grow tired of me, or my health simply gives out, and mircea_popescu will have to learn ada and relearn numbertheory himself...
ascii_field: i already stand on th board with only one foot, in having lately to spend virtually all of my time working on idiotic rubbish so as to pay the rent.
ascii_field: jurov: since you mentioned it, i will explain that i can be taken off the gameboard in any of 1,001 different simple ways, by the lizards, and i have no defense, and that you and the rest should expect this to happen sooner or later and study accordingly
assbot: Logged on 13-03-2016 14:32:19; ascii_field: my hypothesis is that he was not paid to lose, as such, but to keep a particular style of play, and he believed that he could win regardless.
ascii_field: ben_vulpes: see logz from earlier today.
ascii_field: jurov: in usaschwitz, it is enough to be sued, to be driven into penury immediately, you don't even need to lose.
ascii_field: well think.
ascii_field: the only reason it has not happened is that i'm ineffective and uninteresting to anyone...
ascii_field: i have nothing with which to defend.
ascii_field: nothing to stop them from doing it right now.
jurov: while you dream about sophisticated torture devices
jurov: but i did not ask about ubuntu. i asked about m$ suing you about infringing their patents
assbot: Logged on 13-03-2016 18:51:57; danielpbarron: jurov> i wonder what alf will do << lemme try and fill in while he's away : mega-snore! ubuntu, the winbl0wz of linux, thought it could make a smart-f0ne when obviously the mobile world is for usg-blessed corps
ascii_field: in 4th game lee sedol actually decided to play with both hands and wiped the floor with the bot.
ben_vulpes: at least i only had to type my password the *first* time i booted bitcoin under gdb
ben_vulpes: there is only the creeping hell
fluffypony: well you can build iOS apps on just about everything, so you can't get away from that
ben_vulpes: let's just cram all the things i hate about my life into one tidy little package
ben_vulpes: here's to the grand unified microsoft-brand-linux-that-can-build-ios-apps
mod6: i did get gnat to work, so at least i can play with sample programs locally etc.
mod6: im gonna tackle ada this week when my book gets here.
danielpbarron: i think there's already a precedent for the other part; see SEC vs MP
danielpbarron: jurov> i wonder what alf will do << lemme try and fill in while he's away : mega-snore! ubuntu, the winbl0wz of linux, thought it could make a smart-f0ne when obviously the mobile world is for usg-blessed corps ☟︎
BingoBoingo: <mircea_popescu> BingoBoingo i have nfi what's going on with those two articles. they don't even make sense. << I'll get to cutting
assbot: osx - gdb fails with "Unable to find Mach task port for process-id" error - Stack Overflow ... ( http://bit.ly/1QW8qAp )
assbot: Microsoft Has Just Blackmailed Linux Twice in One Single Week and the Media Didn’t Notice or Just Ignored It Because of Microsoft’s Charm Offensives | Techrights ... ( http://bit.ly/1pFcOx1 )