log☇︎
313900+ entries in 0.202s
mircea_popescu: you mean implicit array such as nth element of A as opposed to A[-5] sorta references ?
phf: Then going to lose all old links
mircea_popescu: sure ; if you're going to do that might as well rebase your indexes in db, but anyway.
phf: Could add an offset to your references
phf: Can put it all in array, index things by ids
mircea_popescu: there's nothing inherently inferior about black oops i mean negative numbers, is there ?
phf: Maybe not, I should think about it
phf: I'm not sure of a reasonable way of integrating it though. Main issue, and general with canonical log approach taken so far is each entry has an id, starts at 1, and incremented by assbot database
mircea_popescu: but yes a proper bouncer log would be better, save you the gaps you know ?
phf: Unless somebody steps forward who had a bouncer instance running since the early days
mircea_popescu: yeah ima do that ; tomorro.
phf: If you can pack&upload from 2012 to date above, I can integrate them
mircea_popescu: but of course they're only while i personallt was on
mircea_popescu: **** BEGIN LOGGING AT Thu Apr 12 23:03:54 2012 < i have them earlier
mircea_popescu: check it out, ten bitcents buys you all four.
mircea_popescu: in other news, "Chamicka, age 14, says she accepted Hot Pockets frozen toaster sandwiches for sex and would gladly do it again.Nicole, age 15, says her and her 14 year old sister had sex with a man for a double cheeseburger. Whether it was the cheeseburger meal, and if it was supersized, was not made clear. And Chiquanna, age 14, says she had sex for a lobster buffet dinner."
asciilifeform: at this point i'm not even sure whether most reddit userz are even made of meat
mircea_popescu: im fucking confused, reading lafond on one screen, talking to you here, and you don't use the same word for websocialmedia
mircea_popescu: i dunno that there's that many sexually active womenz on reddit. seems mostly BingoBoingo's mayogenders & weirdo bois.
asciilifeform: typical cunt wants nothing to do with typical cok
diana_coman: well, they don't seem to be adults there really, hence not people :D
mircea_popescu: why do you think everyone'd want me specifically ?
asciilifeform: and the chix can't all ride
asciilifeform: but plox call things as they are, it is not erections that are scarce, but that mircea_popescu has only 1 cock afaik
diana_coman: so kind of more demand than supply
asciilifeform: but they want enough-mp
diana_coman: fwiw my understanding of that is simply that there are a whole lot of women around who can't get enough
asciilifeform: even a tard can muster erect
mircea_popescu: erection is "cheapest thing in the world" in the sense "sword in battlefield is cheapest thing in the world". in yo dreams.
asciilifeform: erection is cheapest thing in the world
mircea_popescu: you get 9 tools type A to 10 tools type B ; all the B's work, about half the A's work and while Bs are always on As are on 1% of the time or so.
asciilifeform: because if taken literally, it is absurd
mircea_popescu: see alfie, erections are scarce now that they have a cure for it.
mircea_popescu: "The white men that were visible were all driving; either cop cars or luxury sedans and SUVs. One SUV-load of stoned and drunk white men were shadowing a group of three black girls, calling out the window asking about prices, assuming they were hookers. A young guy standing at the stop next to me yelled to the insane looking Eastern European drunk that was hanging out the window, “Yo fool, they either givin’ it away or ki
diana_coman: anyway,at this level of haziness I don't think there's much that I can say further;
mircea_popescu: hey, if i didn't know better i'd think you're discussing a trilema article.
diana_coman: but it's not really clear what that is in itself anyway and then it gets mingled with what is actually said
diana_coman: I increasingly get the impression that you are trying to answer in that post to what you perceive to be people's actual ideas of the thing, but
mircea_popescu: diana_coman i believe it's not so different from any other simplified approach, such as johnny bravo seeing hot mammas all around ; or else orc warrior seeing world in terms of threats etc.
diana_coman: or just something in the eyes of the beholder?
mircea_popescu: unrelatedly, this theory that baltimore riots is directly resulting from john hopkins hospital/uni buying gangland, much like flooding of a spot of floor is directly resulting from broom pushing on the other side of puddle is rather interesting.
diana_coman: well, going back to the "interact with reality on different levels" thing might make it perhaps clearer: would this "millionaire vision" be basically a superior level of interaction?
mircea_popescu: because i have no confidence the million is in any way related. it would seem to me the better is truly at issue.
diana_coman: I read that as an implied millionaire=better otherwise why not right it as such: people who are millionaires, are millionaries
mircea_popescu: which is why i didn't approach the matter in ethical terms at all ; much to pete's displeasure.
diana_coman: mk, a state of vision so then what does this have to do with "being better" at all?
mircea_popescu: the object is just the object.
mircea_popescu: being "a millionaire" is much like "being really scary". it's not something the thing IS, it's something the subject perceives.
mircea_popescu: mno. at best it is a state of vision, and thus entirely unrelated to the object,
diana_coman: I suppose the difference comes at heart from defining millionaire as a state of being and thus an inevitable characteristic of the essence of a person (that's my understanding of your position)
mircea_popescu: in purely atomic terms they're incredibly mutable, and a rather good approximation of "random pile of carbon nuclei".
mircea_popescu: as far as this aspriational "being X" is concerned, yeah, they're closer to immutable than anything else.
mircea_popescu: depends in what terms.
diana_coman: so no, adults do not turn into anything other than corpse by the previous definition, but they do not remain immutable really, precisely as they were, precisely what they will always be
mircea_popescu: the whole point is that you can "be" a millionaire in the exact sense you can "be" a wife ; or a tree can "be" yours.
mircea_popescu: i have no idea what it is, and i don't see that it is very much at all.
diana_coman: adults are adults or is now millionaire some other thing in there in between child-adult-corpse-dead?
mircea_popescu: children turn to adults. this does not mean adults can turn into "millionaires".
mircea_popescu: when i broadly reject your proposition of "change" understood in representational terms, i do not by that rejection also somehow reject actual change understood in actual terms.
mircea_popescu: the things that can happen are fewer than the things that can be said.
mircea_popescu: you're not about to try and parlay the fact that the space of possibility is narrower than the space of representations into some sort of dilemma ?
diana_coman: and for that matter what is learning exactly if not change
diana_coman: but things don't turn into anything, so how is this child turns into adult?
mircea_popescu: something like that.
diana_coman: so let me see this: child-adult-corpse-dead
mircea_popescu: similarly a string doesn't "turn into anything". and main section stars don't turn into really large conglomeration of bathroom rubber duckies.
mircea_popescu: they turn to corpses.
diana_coman: if they don't change*
diana_coman: mk, so an adult is set then to whatever s/he is; is that your position above that people don't change? (I still don't see how is this really reconciled with "they turn to shit as they age!!" - if they change, they can't turn to anything )
mircea_popescu: juveniles aren't the animal in any other consideration or context. they WILL be the animal at some point, sure. but the very point of juvenility is they aren't.
diana_coman: it's not about collective-bargaining, it's about the fact that all of a sudden it seems we are talking about different entities, so we need to set the definitions somehow
mircea_popescu: adults of the hs species.
diana_coman: so that we know what we are talking about
mircea_popescu: it'll have to be argued on its own merits, not collective-bargained for.
diana_coman: mk; define people then
mircea_popescu: whether other items are or aren't people has no bearing on the fact that children aren't however.
diana_coman: by that measure old people aren't people and idiots aren't people and non-millionaires aren't people and yeah, sure, there's nothing left to discuss either
diana_coman: and if people don't change, then get yourself a newborn and tell me how is s/he the millionaire
mircea_popescu: to quote marsellus "the punk" wallace, " You see, this profession is filled to the brim with unrealistic motherfuckers. Motherfuckers who thought their ass would age like wine. If you mean it turns to vinegar, it does. If you mean it gets better with age, it don't. "
diana_coman: except some actually improve as they age
mircea_popescu: some quicker than others.
mircea_popescu: people turn to shit as they age, and that's all.
mircea_popescu: this "people change" thing is very dubious.
diana_coman: so I don't quite see the point to expressing circles (other than they are satisfying)
diana_coman: and b. this thing is quite circular as you say it or as I read what you say
diana_coman: hm: a. people change who they are all the time really (think dementia for a clear example, not that all are through illness or that radical)
mircea_popescu: the same exact action, in the hand of the idiot is an idiocy ; and in the hand of the millionare, millionarcy. hence the ancient "there's no such thing as your idea" thread
mircea_popescu: well no. it's a matter of being what they are. hence the ancient "you can't just power cycle a box with no idea of what you are doing".
diana_coman: nope, nor can it be; my observation for what it's worth is that people interact with reality at different levels basically, as they can
mircea_popescu: "At the very least, they need to do what they can do, as it were" << but this is not ~specific~.
diana_coman: hmm, let me try to make it clearer maybe
diana_coman: heh, was I having so much fun that it's unclear whether I am serious or having fun? lolz
mircea_popescu: you saying they are or you saying they aren't ?
mircea_popescu: i read it like 3 times still dun know which one are you saying
diana_coman: and doing all the exercises in the guides, ofc, not "just reading"
diana_coman: don't millionaires really get there by reading guides?
mircea_popescu: diana_coman "Ha, wouldn’t you say that’s how it happens really?" << hey what's this mean ?
mircea_popescu: asciilifeform> pete_dushenski: being the pig is also +ev until christmas. << he has a point. "renegotiable" when your side of the negotiation is pack it and leave and their side is "take it or leave it" is insanity on a stick.
mircea_popescu: phf> so you generally have two problems, one is "how do i group together multiple source code files in order to indicate they are part of same codebase", second is "how do i indicate dependency of this codebase on this other codebase" and third is "how do i autodownload things from internet" <<< all of which are really "how do i install v"
mircea_popescu: phf> So kako's dump which is only id;timestamp;nick;message adds up to ~~150mb <<< when does this start ?