298900+ entries in 0.166s
mircea_popescu: instead, it's a fat
turtle in a pool. well done BingoBoingo
mircea_popescu: fill your cunt with newborn rats,
take panties off in class
mircea_popescu: i suppose it's a pretty decent way
to drive people up
the wall, as an angry
teenager.
BingoBoingo: But
that's old news and rabbits are adorable. Chihuaua is basically rat.
mircea_popescu: asciilifeform rather well researched
too,
the half life of average "bitcoin community"-tard is just about 15 months.
a111: Logged on 2016-05-24 21:52 mircea_popescu: and incidentally, any derp who is preoccupied with "changing society" because "women statistically don't make as much money as men" while not being preoccupied with "changing
the definition of crime" because "the current definitions put more men in prison
than women" is an utter hypocrite.
mircea_popescu: and we'll be bitching about how nominal equality, ie, 3 mn each, hides
the fact
that
there's 2% more women so
there should really be more, exactly in
the manner
they derp
today about how women don't work as long, so
they make less.
mircea_popescu: criminalize being fat, decriminalize rape.
then criminalize
talking back, decriminalize domestic beatings. and keep going until female prison population === male prison population
mircea_popescu: and incidentally, any derp who is preoccupied with "changing society" because "women statistically don't make as much money as men" while not being preoccupied with "changing
the definition of crime" because "the current definitions put more men in prison
than women" is an utter hypocrite.
☟︎ mircea_popescu: from now on,
this is
the bar. facebook is held
to do
the exact same if i say so. because why
the fuck not.
mircea_popescu: so basically, if feminists
tell it
to get fucked, facebook does change its mind.
shinohai: "Google's Paris HQ raided in
tax probe"
shinohai: ^ saw
that
this morning, lulzy
BingoBoingo: end using an image of a relevant activity, such as running or riding a bike." In a statement on Monday, Facebook apologized for its original stance and said it had determined
that
the photo does comply with its guidelines."
BingoBoingo: pany's "ad guidelines". After
the group appealed against
the rejection, Facebook's ad
team initially defended
the decision, writing
that
the photo failed
to comply with
the social networking site's "health and fitness policy". "Ads may not depict a state of health or body weight as being perfect or extremely undesirable," Facebook wrote. "Ads like
these are not allowed since
they make viewers feel bad about
themselves. Instead, we recomm
BingoBoingo: In other lulz: "Facebook has apologized for banning a photo of a plus-sized model and
telling
the feminist group
that posted
the image
that it depicts "body parts in an undesirable manner". Cherchez la Femme, an Australian group
that hosts popular culture
talkshows with "an unapologetically feminist angle", said Facebook rejected an advert featuring
Tess Holliday, a plus-sized model wearing a bikini,
telling
the group it violated
the com
BingoBoingo inserted
the "[client fork]" clarifications
BingoBoingo: * asciilifeform rockets off on small
tour of BingoBoingolandia
tonight << Nah, Chicagoland is basically anti-Bingolandia
solrodar: is
that not what you just said?
solrodar: I look forward
to hearing how you will distribute
the proceeds
to
them
solrodar: mircea_popescu: glad
to hear
that you confiscated kako's mpex account on behalf of
the shareholders and not just yourself
mircea_popescu: so
the story is not at all about
this ; it's all about how it could be
this, and
then becauser it could be, it's ok
that it isn't, and so he's "law abiding"
mircea_popescu: (and for
the record : superman irl would last for about a week, before all
the bills for
torn down walls and destroyed cars would put him away permanently. seems important
to have
this in
the fucking record omfg.)
mircea_popescu: every dork
thinks himself
the main character in his own game, and somehow
to be saved by divine providence just as long as he sticks
to "his principles".
mircea_popescu: somehow
the very distant ballas criticism of
the "single issue independent" doesn't strike home, unless we sit on
the ruined remnants of
the house.
mircea_popescu: anyway.
there's a lot of wisdom fruits in all
this for
the general reader.
mircea_popescu: bullshit. next
time someone "saves" you from having
to pay a 20 btc heating bill by burning down your house, call it kakologic.
mircea_popescu: this claim is not at any point considered or lent any credence by discussion of
the shareholder claim item above. it's dead weight, and it won't be rescued by
trying
to
tack it on
to actual substantial issues.
a111: Logged on 2016-05-24 16:40 jurov: and
the proceeds were
thus impounded
a111: Logged on 2016-05-24 15:52 mp_at_olivos:
the
theory whereby "dead
to me" is supposed
to read "holds a substantial fraction of my assets" and "the difference between
these
two statements only appeared
to me sometime late may, which is coincidentally months after
the alleged causative event and also within minutes of channel discussion of
the fabulous failure of
the miner cartel love
tap and subsequent attempts
to cover it up" may be either partially false or entirely
mircea_popescu: i've yet
to encounter
that mirabilis item,
the bitbet ex-shareholder
that
thinks kakobrekla helped him. and
that's
that.
a111: Logged on 2016-05-24 16:39 jurov: let's please not mix everyhing
together. we have on
table a new (to me) accusation kakobrekla sold share of bitbet under shady circumstances
mircea_popescu: yeah well, education is a square built off a line
that reads "beatings"
mircea_popescu: generally, recall, at
the fucking
time all
this got started,
the same "community" of imbeciles
that had "forum bankers" and whatever
the fuck, ALSO had "glbse" and "investments".
a111: Logged on 2016-05-24 16:28 asciilifeform: it never wholly made sense
to me why
to issue shares for a
thing made of one or
two people.
mircea_popescu: kinda why i'm entertaining
the whole nonsense, supposed
to be educative.
trinque: as
though
the forum is
to play
the role of centralized mob-judge
trinque: there seems
to be pervasive confusion as
to what interacting as peers *means*
mircea_popescu: he is, of course, idemnified as per contract
to "amt actually realised". which is,
to date, 670 btc and change, so
there is
that.
mircea_popescu: davout set
the precedent in, dangerous as it may be, we're now with it.
mircea_popescu: forget
this entire "what derp meant
to do". it's uninteresting. derp's judged on what he did. and if i'm
to pay ~20 btc which nobody disputes i actually spent, because
that's how
the stars alligned, kakobrekla can sure as fuck pay ~2k btc
that some
think he earned, because
that's how
the stars lined up.
jurov: so, he had
the premeditated plan of selling
them and
then waiting for a year
to pull
the plug?
mircea_popescu: asciilifeform guy's
total deposit covered an account creation. whatever he has, he has from selling bitbet, logically.
mircea_popescu: what ceausescu died embracing, and each and every of 'em idiots
to date. "they meant well" and left a hole behind.
mircea_popescu: you know, what every derpy socialist ever says, once his idiocy blows up. "i only meant well", as if
that somehow provides immunity.
mircea_popescu: and if you diverge from it, no matter how you justify
the divergence
to yourself, or
to a random mob of uninvolved bystanders, you'll be held for it.
a111: Logged on 2016-05-24 16:23 jurov: asciilifeform beware!
tmsr considers selling shares of own business as stealing!
mircea_popescu:
http://btcbase.org/log/2016-05-24#1471349 << funny. but no. selling shares in what you pretend
to be a business and
then setting
that on fire however does open you
to liability. because your job as a principal is
to act in
the best interest of
the shareholders.
that's
the only criteria.
the ONLY criteria.
☝︎ trinque: ok, I can move my knob
to 20
trinque: I
think
the
thing as written only ever barfs last six
to avoid spamming
the channel
trinque: asciilifeform: got your message; perhaps
they come out rapidly enough
that more
than six get dumped at a
time
to RSS?
trinque: you people are still going on like old spinsters
trying
to wrangle
this
thing legally
jurov: do you have anything
to say
to
this one?
trinque: if you cross someone with whom you're doing business, and
the cost
to
their reputation is not enough
to harm
them,
they fuck you back.
jurov: and
the proceeds were
thus impounded
☟︎ jurov: let's please not mix everyhing
together. we have on
table a new (to me) accusation kakobrekla sold share of bitbet under shady circumstances
☟︎ jurov: he had 25%
that was not on mpex
thus not possible
to sell.
then he got another 25% which was *supposed
to be sold
to public*
jurov: to sell half of future golden eggs upfront
to investors?