293200+ entries in 1.894s

jborkl:
A blade could be added ( get work) from
a remote location and use stratum native
jborkl: Yeah, I have so more stuff to add and it would be
a fully functional pool that could be deployed in 15 minutes
jborkl: Been running 3 days without
a problem
jborkl: I made my own creation,
a get work to stratum so my blades can mine solo
thestringpuller: is that like
a joke on how america believe God will save everyone?
dub: Ima setup
a dozen of these bullshit scab blogs and donate proceeds to Irans nuclear program
thestringpuller: I mean sure I could email him, "Get
a job, get health insurance" etc. but meh
catmeow_: it seems like the bet is getting
a lot of attention.
thestringpuller: it's okay to pay for the cops to beat up
a nigga with tax payer money
catmeow_: thestringpuller: why would you laugh at him making
a joke about someone with cancer? you're an asshole.
Duffer1: thestringpuller so what Namworld put together was
a base layer that someone can build functions on top of?
ozbot: BitBet incorrectly declares yes to
a no bet. Stay Away from BitBet!
catmeow_: dub: but seroiusly... lets talk about the bet for
a second... what do you think
a unit is?
pankkake: who wouldn't wish to be
a girl?
catmeow_: "Hi bitfury, I'm interesed in ordering 10 400Gh units, but I dont understand what
a 'unit' is comprised of, can you please let me know what hardware will be included in
a 400Gh unit? Thanks" I'll let you guys know what the response is... i'm assuming they'll take me seriously because i said i'm intereseted in buying 4Th/sec
thestringpuller: and voila you have
a basic testing environment to use his functions
catmeow_: Hey guys, i sent bitfurystrikesback
a personal email to see if they can describe what fits in
a 400Gh unit.
thestringpuller: basically make
a unit test function that feeds hardcoded data into Namworld's functions, then run that function
thestringpuller: just make
a standalone script for now, dump the code in raw
thestringpuller: Duffer1: do this. Go to script.google.com , create
a new script project. Dump all that code the namworld posted into the main code file (you can name this whatever you want). Change the API keys to match your own from BTCTC and Havelock etc.
Duffer1: i'm still just starting out, being cautious with my pile, getting
a tool like this working proper would be
a huge help to me
thestringpuller: no problem, i didn't know namworld had built
a toolkit like this
Anduck: unit can be
a group of units
catmeow_: Anduck: well,
a unit certainly shouldn't be regarded as two seperate mining devices.
catmeow_: Anduck: I think the bet was badly worded... and probably should have been cancelled. But if you follow technicalities it probably should have been
a no. although most of the conditions were met. i will concede this.
Anduck: it's got pretty valid points why it's
a "yes"
Anduck: catmeow_: don't you see the bet was clearly
a yes? read the thread you're refering to
Anduck: have you been here using
a nick "fractal" or "wogwog" ?
catmeow_: Are you guys concerned that BitBet might have been bribed by Anduck / pankkake to pass the bet as yes, even though it was obviously
a no?
catmeow_: so basically if we break the bet down, we can see that it says 'must meet advertised performance' and mentions the 400Gh unit at 400W.... if we look closely we see that the 400Gh unit contains 1M-board and 16H-cards.... it seems that this combination doesn't hash at 400Gh. it hashes at 365Gh.... therefore the hardware missed performance targets, therefore the bet is
a no..... bitbet made the bet pass, so therefore there is som
catmeow_: pankkake: thestringpuller isn't making people rage... why are you such
a jerk?
catmeow_: thestringpuller: do you think the bet is
a yes or no? how come? lets discuss.
catmeow_: this does not exist. how can the bet be
a yes if all clauses in the bet weren't met? the hardware didn't meet performance targets
catmeow_: but seroiusly, back on topic.... its obvoius the bet was
a no
kakobrekla: lol i didnt know there was
a collection
Luke-Jr: jurov: meh, no rush, it's just
a crash
catmeow_: that should basically prove the bet is
a no. since the manufacturer himself said that 400Gh can't be delivered in 1 unit, and missed performance targets
catmeow_: do you guys think maybe someone was paid off to make the bet
a yes? integrity42 makes some good points.
catmeow: who else agrees with the thread that the bet should be
a no?
catmeow: but seriously. lets talk about it for
a second... 2 units != 1 unit... i agree with the thread
pankkake: thestringpuller: /ignore is
a great feature
catmeow: but seroiusly, the bet is obviously
a no
catmeow: who is this pankkake character? he seems to be very angry about the post.... is he
a bitbet employee?
catmeow: Can't belive BitBet blatantly made the bet
a no when it should have been
a yes
ozbot: BitBet incorrectly declares yes to
a no bet. Stay Away from BitBet!
thestringpuller: e.g. if you're
a powerful person and people live by your example, be somewhat fucking ethical
kakobrekla: the truth of the matter is, there is only
a few persons in the btw world that dont get sell their soul for some bitdust
pankkake: hmm no you're right, metadata.xml confirms him as
a maintainer (or is it proxy maintainer?)
gesell: some 6 months ago or so i remember seeing some mathematician discussing various automated trading strategies with
a strong bias on the math. anyone remember this and know where it is?
ThickAsThieves: the linked chart, if i read it correctly, pretty much shows all hardware on that list is
a loss
kakobrekla: but i got the chips from first batch for free, made the pcbs for
a few euros and thats that
pankkake: tldr #bitcoin-assets everything sucks and is
a scam
gesell: coinbase in 2-3 days... seems pretty beneath
a decade
gesell: pff OTC as too high
a premium
gesell: i got coin, want to sell and want to get $ in less then
a week
gesell: what is the fastest way to get money out to
a US account?
pankkake: actually wanted to use that name for
a different project of mine
benkay: i've seriously been pondering doing
a warehouse or
a shittily insulated office and putting ASIC blades by every desk
gribble: (seen [<channel>] <nick>) -- Returns the last time <nick> was seen and what <nick> was last seen saying. <channel> is only necessary if the message isn't sent on the channel itself. <nick> may contain * as
a wildcard.
Luke-Jr: pankkake: there hasn't been
a usable implementation done yet :/
benkay: let's stay under the radar for
a little longer, shall we?
Luke-Jr: and if you try to make
a new manmade isle, some existing governments will steal it
Anduck: but people remembers france as
a loser country
Luke-Jr: pankkake: it's because he uses
a female avatar on bitcointroll
pankkake: the -
a is confusing, it usually hints female
pankkake: but here is
a little troll: you interact with me already with another identity
Luke-Jr: now stop being
a retard and shut up
wogwog_: pankkake: that statement proves that you're
a bad person and are likely
a paid shill
wogwog_: pankkake: thats not nice. you're not
a nice person.
pankkake: the only good thing
a dictionnary would be for now is bashing wogwog's head