asciilifeform: even leaves open the interpretations 'genius scammer' or 'scamming genius.'
asciilifeform: rll-1 supplement does not settle the 'scammer or genius' question, perhaps surprisingly.
asciilifeform: genius: it worked, he wanted to conquer world / get rich / etc. with it.
asciilifeform: scammer: it never worked really, he won the 'traveller' tourney using his brain plus a few automated routines
asciilifeform: he never published the source of 'eurisko'. each hypothesis provides an explanation for why.
asciilifeform: the schoolbook telling of the 'eurisko' project - open an encyclopaedia of computing, traditionally it is mentioned as a seminal work - suggests this.
asciilifeform: another - where he was onto something.
asciilifeform: (the facts actually favour this hypothesis. he collected $billions for 'cyc' project, never showed any useful result.)
asciilifeform: in response to years of prodding from various folks, and mircea_popescu reminding me that 'lesswrong' existed, i took an hour or so to digitize the old douglas lenat papers. now need a place to host
asciilifeform: mircea_popescu: doesn't make it worthless.
asciilifeform: mircea_popescu: it doesn't usually survive this treatment
asciilifeform: mircea_popescu: this is generally why ancient sf is best read in childhood