2700+ entries in 0.064s
williamdunne: Must've accidentally trashed the email alerting me of it
williamdunne: Isn't violence against transsexualism also generally considered homophobia, or at least some sort of xenophobia
williamdunne: mircea_popescu: Scoop was down for a while, I committed an upgrade too early
williamdunne: At the moment doesn't support adding new feeds. That will come soon-ish
williamdunne: Scoop the fourth is now re-written. Will be moved to a server, rather than my laptop
williamdunne: Basically some way to get json on the trust between two people
williamdunne: ;;later tell kakobrekla would it be possible for w.b-a.link/some/parameters to return valid JSON?
williamdunne: So if it were changed so that it uses valid json
williamdunne: I'm assuming btcalpha is parsing the API in its current state
williamdunne: I'm suggesting that if with .json it returned valid json it could not break btcalpha with the suggested update
williamdunne: BingoBoingo: You're right, I'll make it @ or summin
williamdunne: Seems like a pretty rough line, either way its a choice, and the outcome is losing future income in return for something
williamdunne: If you acknowledge La Serenissima are you its slavegirl because you pay 0.1%?
williamdunne: Their slave? Its a mutual agreement from the beginning
williamdunne: What if someone else pays for a degree and in return they get a % of my salary?
williamdunne: I understand with a gender studies degree though..
williamdunne: If I invest in college, and the outcome is a law degree, with which I become a lawyer, how is that not investment?
williamdunne: If you expect expenditure to result in a return?
williamdunne: At what point does expenditure become investment?
williamdunne: ben_vulpes: I don't know if this exists outside of GitHub (I rather assumed it does) but when you fork a repo so its your own version of it, you make changes to your own copy and then request that your changes are merged into the core repo
williamdunne: One of those is a social issue, the other is solved by not accepting pulls from dickheads, no?
williamdunne still doesn't understand whats wrong with git and pgp sigs
williamdunne: Yeah, I've not done much when it comes to native applications so anything client-side isn't really my boat
williamdunne: "Adlai envisions 'wothub' as a content-addressable signed patchstore" well its doable, but I only have 'x' amount of time
williamdunne: !s not committing to it while I can't guarantee I'll execute
williamdunne: Guessing some people wanted to kick it old school and not move to the re-write, and there was enough of them that apache updated got called apache2, but thats just a guess
williamdunne: jurov: "Because potentially it could make money, its an excuse to learn more tech, and there is little risk in terms of what I could lose by doing it"
williamdunne: jurov: Did quite well on the other platforms until the SEC stepped in, not particularly large time investment needs to be made.
williamdunne: I mean the platform, not the general idea of selling future income
williamdunne: Its not really a unique idea though, been done twice as far as I can tell. Both started in US but had obvious legal issues come up
williamdunne: The entire point is its meant to be risky as shit
williamdunne: Indeed, I'm not talking bout some sort of service where 100 people deposit money and then a "money manager" decides who to invest in
williamdunne: trinque: Because people live on a different timeperiod to the company in many cases
williamdunne: The operator, its not like they're selling 40% of £40,000/year, they're selling 40% of whatever they make, with no guarantees of said figure
williamdunne: Yeah, don't let them sell 500% of their income
williamdunne: That exact problem could exist with regular stocks. Whats the incentive for Exxon to keep generating revenue? Start up, sell out, cash out, bro down
williamdunne: trinque: some sort of record of the files and shasums then
williamdunne: Maybe there is a good reason why this would not work, but could you not just generate an XML file that contains the names of all the files, a hash of each file, and then sign the XML? Could be automated fairly easily and would work on top of existing solutions
☟︎ williamdunne: davout: How is that different to git? You can blame individual lines of coding using git
williamdunne: You can store anything on git, so nothing stopping you from attaching signatures
williamdunne: Not like they can modify the code or take it from you, just delete it from their servers
williamdunne: What difference does it make if you have local backups and its all signed?