log☇︎
219400+ entries in 0.066s
mircea_popescu: http://log.bitcoin-assets.com/?date=21-05-2015#1141011 << shit i had noticed the traffic was drooping ☝︎
mircea_popescu: these two are related.
mircea_popescu: o
mircea_popescu: how DID you come up with the nick then ? you terrorist you.
mircea_popescu: i always thought that's the reference o.O
mircea_popescu: that is one of them
mircea_popescu: (just published it)
mircea_popescu: asciilifeform i meanwhile added some more notes!
mircea_popescu: https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/597631037569634304/p81c93Ed.jpg << dude dpb actually has a better beard than me
mircea_popescu: anyway. laters all!
mircea_popescu: (it does sometimes yield a factor, but not reliably)
mircea_popescu: it is yeah. i need moar sleeps.
mircea_popescu: for some reason i was thinking you're doing rabin-miller
mircea_popescu: eh nm you did say ecm.
mircea_popescu: mind trying lenstra ?
mircea_popescu: (not saying it's likely the case, anyway)
mircea_popescu: that doesn't fix a bad rng
mircea_popescu: no, you run it multiple times because it's probabilistic.
mircea_popescu: depends a lot on the rng too
mircea_popescu: and all for 10-20 digit ?
mircea_popescu: well how many is countless ?
mircea_popescu: Apocalyptic you know it'd be halpful if youactually counted them / documented the attempts
mircea_popescu: Apocalyptic what have you tried ?
mircea_popescu: jurov something like that.
mircea_popescu: trinque seems it has issues wiht locking
mircea_popescu: Hasimir i am aware.
mircea_popescu: they're all keys. how you package them is irrelevant
mircea_popescu: tbh, someone has to explain this "subkeys" retardation to me sometime. fucking pseudohierarchy devoid of meaning.
mircea_popescu: all what ?
mircea_popescu: at least two, maybe three different types so far
mircea_popescu: they're not even all in the same class.
mircea_popescu: nope.
mircea_popescu: danielpbarron server's atm busy with a large computation which is why it's not answering ya
mircea_popescu: oh, is it rebuilding the P huh ascii_field
mircea_popescu: there's no such thing as a retest
mircea_popescu: that'd be the sadness of all time.
mircea_popescu: we blessfully don't have 2~!11 as a factor yet
mircea_popescu: yes
mircea_popescu: aha.
mircea_popescu: ascii_field some that had only broken moduli, in pairs.
mircea_popescu: Hasimir just put the pubkey in the box and it'll tell you if it has or hasn't
mircea_popescu: yes, as it happens, oct.
mircea_popescu: i have no idea what you're saying.
mircea_popescu: wut ?!
mircea_popescu: if not, it will be
mircea_popescu: Hasimir if it's been already processed you can see yourself the result
mircea_popescu: Hasimir you have read the paragraph at the beginning yes ?
mircea_popescu: hence "probably". and hence http://log.bitcoin-assets.com/?date=20-05-2015#1140223 ☝︎
mircea_popescu: some others are yet unknown
mircea_popescu: two examples are given there, each with two moduli with 8-12 digit factos known
mircea_popescu: now, of that list, at least some are thoroughly broken
mircea_popescu: what's one to do ?
mircea_popescu: you can create a key for obama and sks will list "obama's" key.
mircea_popescu: pgp has no way to enforce names
mircea_popescu: ascii_field except a modulus does not exist outside of a key.
mircea_popescu: if he also has a rsa key by the same name, he will be in the list of rsa keys.
mircea_popescu: in general, one's at liberty to create a Patented Leather Assymetric Key and give it his name
mircea_popescu: i dun see dsa/elgamal keys were listedf.
mircea_popescu: the way text works is that the reader has the job of forming a mental image that does not contradict the text.
mircea_popescu: the way text works is not that reader is free to make whatever assumptions he wishes and it is the responsibility of the text to explicitly dispel them
mircea_popescu: Hasimir i do not see this point.
mircea_popescu: it's a rsa factorization service.
mircea_popescu: Hasimir so what's disingenuous ?
mircea_popescu: Hasimir wouldja quote the claim you speak of ?
mircea_popescu: !up ascii_field
mircea_popescu: Apocalyptic well sure, theoretical theory. but if you run a factorizing algo on any of the keys you'll see they break apart.
mircea_popescu: well, it would be the rsa wouldn't it.
mircea_popescu: Hasimir doh.
mircea_popescu: ascii_field ima get the key one sec.
mircea_popescu: this isn't the assumption here
mircea_popescu: Apocalyptic finding a small factor is not inherently breaking a specially crafted key that was made to have that one small factor, yes.
mircea_popescu: lemme fish them out for you a sec.
mircea_popescu: aha
mircea_popescu: Hasimir "Rob Hansen" doesn't appear on the page ?
mircea_popescu: Apocalyptic aha.
mircea_popescu: go ahead
mircea_popescu: !up Hasimir
mircea_popescu: anyway, you could just run a probabilistic test on it.
mircea_popescu: i dun see this argument.
mircea_popescu: ie, you wouldn't use that key.
mircea_popescu: Apocalyptic well, "totally broken". depends what you're trying to do and so on. having a known small factor is already breakage
mircea_popescu: hanbot seems improbable.
mircea_popescu: Apocalyptic iirc shcneier actually was recommending e=3 (d is the private traditionally)
mircea_popescu: !up ascii_field
mircea_popescu: suppose the exponent was 3.
mircea_popescu: well, it's complicated.
mircea_popescu is not following.
mircea_popescu: which sense ?
mircea_popescu: cool.
mircea_popescu: !up Landgull
mircea_popescu: nao, linking "phuctor" anchor to usg-replacement.
mircea_popescu: ascii_field : http://security.stackexchange.com/questions/89713/offline-rsa-strong-prime-test-similar-to-phuctor << shilling intensifies!
mircea_popescu: prolly some osx cleverness ?
mircea_popescu: what kernel is this ?
mircea_popescu: notrly valgrind's problem, this. if system reports it as allocated, it's allocated as far as its concerned
mircea_popescu: bitstein honestly, the blowing up of the entire "car dealers" bs is pretty much the only thing i actually like about mr tesla.
mircea_popescu: it's vtol cash.
mircea_popescu: !s private eye from:mircea
mircea_popescu: heh.
mircea_popescu: does it say why ?