log☇︎
210600+ entries in 0.044s
mircea_popescu: Explorers on the good chain:
mircea_popescu: https://live.blockcypher.com/btc/
mircea_popescu: https://blockchain.info/
mircea_popescu: http://btc.blockr.io/ <-- (seems to be flip flopping between the two chains)
mircea_popescu: Uh oh all these block explorers just flipped over to the invalid chain: ☟︎
mircea_popescu: on the record having lied for profit and all that good stuff, but why should anything matter.
mircea_popescu: why ? he's a god fearing rotinculo from wisconsin or whatever.
mircea_popescu: this is such a goatfucked moment for teh schmucks...
mircea_popescu: lmao
mircea_popescu: happy pappy ?
mircea_popescu: anyway, this is jit to lay kakobrekla's wonderments to rest.
mircea_popescu: get out.
mircea_popescu: lmao right.
mircea_popescu: o yea. that's part's gonna be epic.
mircea_popescu: i dun see it. the rule is "come to school dressed". if you all agree to wear skirts or all agree to wear cardigans, it's still school.
mircea_popescu: otherwise, no.
mircea_popescu: decimation provided their "mine support" actually materializes
mircea_popescu: this is no skin off my back, who cares.
mircea_popescu: the idea is they don't want to see some stuff that validates anymore
mircea_popescu: ben_vulpes all thios would validate under .5
mircea_popescu: hard fork is enlarging the rules.
mircea_popescu: well, any people can at any time decide to narrow the rules. this makes some sense.
mircea_popescu: i have nfi how the power rangers imagine they'll manage a hardfork when they can't as much as get a "relevant support" softwork that's fairly uncontroversial.
mircea_popescu: let 'em figure out how to do soft forks or w/e.
mircea_popescu: anyway, todd is right. the only way this affects us is that we don't really give much of a shit.
mircea_popescu: Bitcoin Core (after 0.10.0) rejects these invalid blocks, but a lot of other stuff doesn't. SPV Bitcoinj wallets do no validation what-so-ever, blindly following the longest chain. blockchain.info doesn't appear to do validation as well; who knows what else? <<
mircea_popescu: "we just sittin' here noddin'"
mircea_popescu: BIP66 protocol rule changes have gone active in part thanks to Antpool and F2Pool's support of it - but their pool appears to not actually be enforcing the new rules, and is now mining invalid blocks << lulzy.
mircea_popescu: not a step bac
mircea_popescu: and 2) retty much that.
mircea_popescu: gotta explain to the masses 1) how irresponsible it is to empower scammers, whjether they call themselves "pirate", "Gavin" or anything else
mircea_popescu: anyway, foundation ppl : plox to make a statement on this matter
mircea_popescu: can they make up their mind or something ?
mircea_popescu: ben_vulpes wait, the usg dept of stupid is now on the record that miners don't, after all, decide ?
mircea_popescu: anyway.
mircea_popescu: "new bip66 rule" my foot.
mircea_popescu: ben_vulpes tjhat's the only position.
mircea_popescu: anbd how teh fuck does it continue on an orphan block anyway
mircea_popescu: sorry, i mean 6 and 5.
mircea_popescu: the "lonmger chain" 6.
mircea_popescu: note the orphaned is 8 blocks long
mircea_popescu: looks a lot like a withholding chain attack tbh
mircea_popescu: https://blockchain.info/blocks << apparently they orphaned everything past bw.com's https://blockchain.info/block-height/363730
mircea_popescu: yes, but those happen all teh time
mircea_popescu: ( cat debug.log | grep -B3 "blocks=363738" if nothing else)
mircea_popescu: anyone see one ?
mircea_popescu: [ This is the only occurrence ]
mircea_popescu: i dun see another peer other than the 148 above that claims to have 738
mircea_popescu: i guess they eventually settled on pretending it's an accident or what ?
mircea_popescu: seems so.
mircea_popescu: anyone actually see these ?
mircea_popescu: 363737 21 minutes1663,059.67 BTC BW.COM 65.25
mircea_popescu: 363738 16 minutes3204,982.79 BTC BitFury 180.66
mircea_popescu: version message: version 70002, blocks=363738
mircea_popescu: accepted connection 148.251.238.178:55366
mircea_popescu: none of my nodes verify the imaginary 737-738 blockchain.info claims to exist.
mircea_popescu: asciilifeform listen, seems the chain actually forked. ☟︎
mircea_popescu: heh we actually are forked nao. i dun see any such 738
mircea_popescu: <ben_vulpes> of the active users. << well, like a dozen or so people, spent a month in game last month. so like, 2 hrs / day or somesuch
mircea_popescu: i don't run one so nfi what its problem would be. ion all likeliness something stupid.
mircea_popescu: <assbot> Raising Darwin's Consciousness << all this "consciousness" bs reads to me like direct pastiche from "class consciousness" or however that nonsense was translated to english
mircea_popescu: news at 12:55, which happens to be the time here.
mircea_popescu: apparently new nodes are all shit.
mircea_popescu: decimation old nodes are all fine.
mircea_popescu: <asciilifeform> ben_vulpes, mod6, mircea_popescu, et al: anybody interested in multiprocessorizing bitcoin sig check ? << i don't see the benefit. ☟︎
mircea_popescu: <asciilifeform> they'd just all happen to be employees of the house. << if you only divulge winning tickets you get the natural occurence of winners + extras.
mircea_popescu: hm.
mircea_popescu: i see 736 throughout
mircea_popescu: ;;bc,stats
mircea_popescu: sooo... we splitted hjuh ?
mircea_popescu: http://log.bitcoin-assets.com/?date=03-07-2015#1185164 << o has it ? mod6 you got any opinion on the subject ? ☝︎
mircea_popescu: fucktards srsly.
mircea_popescu: http://log.bitcoin-assets.com/?date=03-07-2015#1185163 <<< but i thought they OWNED REDDIT NOTES!!11 ☝︎
mircea_popescu: http://log.bitcoin-assets.com/?date=03-07-2015#1185130 << thread's not easy to wear out. ☝︎
mircea_popescu: http://log.bitcoin-assets.com/?date=03-07-2015#1185122 << dat sentence :D ☝︎
mircea_popescu: want a loaf of tuber bread ?
mircea_popescu: http://log.bitcoin-assets.com/?date=03-07-2015#1185066 o.O ☝︎
mircea_popescu: this difference is a lot more marked than the subtle contortions the supreme court's been using these last years to rule in favour of unexamined hipsterism
mircea_popescu: http://log.bitcoin-assets.com/?date=03-07-2015#1184982 << there is a difference between "reason to believe poses a threat" and "no reason to believe doens't pose a threat". ☝︎
mircea_popescu: nobody could distinguish its output from normal reddit functioning.
mircea_popescu: http://log.bitcoin-assets.com/?date=03-07-2015#1184941 << would be infinitely better if it used "english dictionary" instead of "base64" as an encoding mechanism. ☝︎
mircea_popescu: wut ?!
mircea_popescu: http://log.bitcoin-assets.com/?date=03-07-2015#1184940 << wait. ☝︎
mircea_popescu: http://log.bitcoin-assets.com/?date=03-07-2015#1184912 << but you would have statistically visible "overwinning". ☝︎☟︎
mircea_popescu: http://log.bitcoin-assets.com/?date=03-07-2015#1184908 << this is dubious. people failed to realise and walk away from us, why would they move away ever ? ☝︎
mircea_popescu: http://log.bitcoin-assets.com/?date=03-07-2015#1184853 << that ☝︎
mircea_popescu: shinohai great.
mircea_popescu: http://log.bitcoin-assets.com/?date=03-07-2015#1184841 << was an important milestone this. at least for my internals. ☝︎
mircea_popescu: http://log.bitcoin-assets.com/?date=03-07-2015#1184828 << speaking of which : a) you folk are gonna publish ips once the sync's done yes ? and b) bringing a seed up on nsa hardware this month maybe ? ☝︎☟︎
mircea_popescu: i dunno how or why it'd be worth anyone's time, outside of the perverse interests of entomologists etc.
mircea_popescu: this is why i have people doing summaries of the shit, which summaries i generally do not read.
mircea_popescu loses interest after six lines or so.
mircea_popescu: now that usg finally arrayed enough ethereum shitfountains to imagine it can pull it off, the tune changed. and it changed mid sentence and full spin around.
mircea_popescu: http://log.bitcoin-assets.com/?date=03-07-2015#1184817 << the loller of all time. when bitcoinj were making a 2nd implementation, the same crowd gnashed teeth about what a horribly bad and not good and dangerous and canned doom of an idea it is. ☝︎
mircea_popescu: http://log.bitcoin-assets.com/?date=03-07-2015#1184791 << it's not that far off, i was thinking g_l sounded a lot like a much younger rms. ☝︎
mircea_popescu: this is rank nonsense if you think any about it. the only part of sex that's in short supply is the erect penis. everything else is overabundant. how exactly would the owners of the only rare part be paying anyone for anything whatsoever ? ☟︎
mircea_popescu: ve never heard of a sexual market where men pay.
mircea_popescu: http://log.bitcoin-assets.com/?date=02-07-2015#1184781 << i ☝︎
mircea_popescu: http://log.bitcoin-assets.com/?date=02-07-2015#1184774 << no, i'm sure it works quite well. a good pick-up line is made out of two parts, one's a valuation and the other's an unknown. then conversation can proceed around the unknown and as it proceeds, etc. ☝︎
mircea_popescu: what exactly about this chick or that dude is making them be "regular folks", which is to say chattel rather than persons ?