15800+ entries in 0.021s
mod6: thanks for mentioning
mod6: oh like "(let ([if #f])"
mod6: whats the deal in there?
mod6: seems like we'll have to write a lot of our own procedure libs. which is maybe a good thing i guess.
mod6: and the tinyscheme docs
mod6: asciilifeform: sicp
mod6: once i do some more reading im going to attempt to read a file.
mod6: more reading i guess.
mod6: i guess it just says "unbound variable: system" but it seems to be in the docs under extentions. *shrug*
mod6: i was trying to do (system "ls") or whatever with tinyscheme, but i must be doin something wrong
mod6: i think im like, getting lost in all the different dialects of lisp.
mod6: like there's this thing called 'guile' that'll let you issue system commands and such...
mod6: i was lookin at tinyscheme stuff. trying to wrap my mind around stuff.
mod6: me too, busy as f. but im out of the woods on this work thing i think.
mod6: how's everyone doing tonight?
mod6: asciilifeform: that 1 bit chip was interesting
mod6: Saw your later tell, thanks.
mod6: anyway, i the latest, we just pulled that out for the time being.
mod6: anyway, not sure how i ever mixed that up.
mod6: yah. i realized that lastnight. i think it also has to do with that i was using a derp version of gnupg too
mod6: Ok Gentlemen, I've gotta run for a few here. Jacmet: Thanks again for stopping in. When you're ready with your new key, stop on back and we'll help you get setup in the WoT. Cheers!
mod6: i was sweating that we were going to have to 'roll our own'.
mod6: Jacmet: oh fantastic, glad i asked.
mod6: <+Jacmet> mod6: and why the manual download of openssl/db/boost instead of just letting Buildroot do it? << actually, one thing I think we're considering is doing a modification to buildroot so that we don't pull its deps over the wan via rsync. is there a way, currently, to just place all of its deps somewhere so it won't rsync?
mod6: np. well, we've been working for quite a while now to get all of this tooling setup the way we need it. we haven't had a reason to move forward with the version.
mod6: <+mircea_popescu> make a 4kb key and use it rather than the strange md5 lists or what's that. << RSA too.
mod6: Jacmet: thanks for stopping in.
mod6: ugh. man. computers right?
mod6: haha. also gives you the shits.
mod6: yaaa, i recall this
mod6: glad i checked or they would have been in there 2x.
mod6: jurov: lol, those emails envetually went through!!!?!
mod6: yeah, maybe alf has it
mod6: and this is a gentoo VM? or ubuntu?
mod6: huh, yeah wouldn't have expected that
mod6: ok now to resend those emails...
mod6: jurov: glad you got it resolved tho. let us know how it goes for you.
mod6: just only was in a hurry to get back into sync.
mod6: no super rush there.
mod6: so once we're happy with this build-script, etc. we cna update that wiki, then we're back in sync. then I can take some time to get the makefiles stuff all organized.
mod6: thanks for your help all. much appreciated.
mod6: 9 connections, there soemthing i don't see everyday.
mod6: ah, ya, haven't looked yet tho.
mod6: im making a `typescript' of the output as well. will post later when its complete.
mod6: shinohai: ok cool! im running mine right now
mod6: the link is above if anyone wants to give it a try.
mod6: ah, ok good deal shinohai. I updated the script so that it doens't even pull that .sign file. we'll just rely on the sha512 that I hvae, alf has, and ben has.
mod6: well, someday maybe. still a dog with fleas.
mod6: maybe i should rewrite V in C
mod6: then that makes a bit more sense.
mod6: but, say, normal use; you log in, you get a shell, you type `ls` and that would just work as expected right?
mod6: my mind is blown. these are C binaries.
mod6: but i thought you said that `ls` and `pwd` didn't work, like in your shell. that shouldn't have anything to do with perl.
mod6: lemme see if i get this. perl with thread support broke your entire gentoo?
mod6: wait, now it works?!?!
mod6: in other news jurov, im about to re-send the emails from yesterday
mod6: asciilifeform or trinque have any thoughts for the man?
mod6: yeah, probably need to re-chroot or whatever it is with gentoo
mod6: im simply curious here, never seen a pwd fail before.
mod6: what does `which pwd` tell you?
mod6: ok, so pwd just fails as is.
mod6: and it'll look for .wot in /
mod6: because then your pwd would be /
mod6: are you in / when executing V, by doing something like `/path/to/where/V/is/actually/located/v.pl`
mod6: so again, this is because somehow V thinks that your pwd is in / ?
mod6: v5.20.2 for x86_64-linux
mod6: jurov: fwiw, i do a huge % of testing on a gentoo env with perl 5.20...
mod6: it'd be like doing the same thing in a bash script: PWD=`pwd`; echo $PWD;
mod6: perl doesn't care about what subprocesses a unix command may or may not use tho.
mod6: fork() shoudn't even be a consideration here... im confused.
mod6: pwd is used iirc in v.pl, but only in the contex of it being a shell out - your environment should execute this and return the result to a scalar.
mod6: what version of *nix & what version of perl
mod6: jurov: do you mean `pwd' ?
mod6: sha512 for build-bitcoind-V99995.sh is now ^^
mod6: c2ed1ccbb6769ada764b6d31e7a06873860c422109c4f8506cbda04402243c0534c9555f44f4c47071ebc3d6e3ece720b84de2940a2639381ef77652b34c3030