asciilifeform: naggum and stack were similar in that actually getting all of the support they were 'supposed to have to run business' would likely have ~wiped them out~ financially and still put them no farther away from statal rape
asciilifeform: why do you suppose people fuck goats?
asciilifeform: and it wasn't a slap on the wrist, it was - iirc - a pretty penny
asciilifeform: tax expert would have somehow settled the 80% norwegian tax, assessed ~based on profession~, rather than actual receipts, into something sane?!
asciilifeform: it is not actually hard to massively improve on cadr, much of its gnarl was that it had to be made of 74xxx and of weird amd ALUs available at the time
asciilifeform: (modern vendors succumb to the temptation to put a great many special-purpose parts in fpga, e.g., multipliers, even whole cpu cores, etc. i am specifically not talking about their rubbish.)
asciilifeform: even if enemy supplies ~all~ of the cubes.
asciilifeform: handily solves 'diddle' also - which cube will the enemy sabotage ? how does he know which one will hold what part of your circuit before you assemble them ?
asciilifeform: picture 1,024 'cubes of computronium'
asciilifeform: where 'computer' is simply this mass, of how many of these things you screwed together and attached dc power supply to.
asciilifeform: but one where the physical package is brought out to a 'nuts and bolts' thing that you can screw into an aggregate, tiled, without making pcb
asciilifeform: analogously, the correct thing to make today would be not merely fpga,
asciilifeform: (if they had to try to make ~it~ they would quickly fight with swords again)
asciilifeform: just as afghanis make kalash with hand tools, yes, but do not worry about getting ammo, it is gettable
asciilifeform: my take on it, is that if you are using some industrial product in this, it absolutely has to be something available in MASSIVE qty, readily
asciilifeform: i.e. there is no effective way to subtly sabotage the thing if you do not know the victim's intended circuit layout.
asciilifeform: fpga also plays well with my 'specificity of diddling' theorem.
asciilifeform: (fpga only became a seriously practical thing, really, in 2000s. you will find them from '90s but on MASSIVE boards with dozens of the same unit)
asciilifeform: unfortunately it would have to be on a reasonably recent density, to be useful.
asciilifeform: the by far least idiotic item to make.
asciilifeform: if i could make one thing, on a traditional si process, it would be an fpga.