log☇︎
139300+ entries in 0.239s
mircea_popescu: evidently, the thing that does THE REINSTALLING is the os.
mircea_popescu: actually, let me rephrase : how could an item that can need reinstalling be called an os ?
mircea_popescu: what sort of piece of shit os is this whereby system breakage to the level where bsod is possible!
mircea_popescu: why the fuck would i!
mircea_popescu: i don't reinstall my toilet, or my stove, or my car.
mircea_popescu: phf why would my os ever need to be reinstalled ?
phf: i missed a point re phk though. is the idea that "scripted os-reinstall" is a bad idea, or that it's insufficient?
mircea_popescu: come to think of it, he was at the fortefront of the whole "object oriented" "revolution" also, wasn't he.
asciilifeform: dunno that it makes sense to give any particular printolade-bubble overseer the distinction of a name and attributed agency. it's not unlike pinning the black plague on a particular, named rat
mircea_popescu: big deal to manage to be dumber than calvin.
mircea_popescu: in fact, o'reilly has the unique distinction of having produced more crap per unit useful than ~everything known to man, including the anglican church, the various other protestants and so on
phf: actually, no, we were talking about o'reilly and web 2.0
phf: i'm pretty sure we had that in thread
mircea_popescu: incidentally, do we agree that o'reilly pushing esr idiocy ("bazaar") is responsible for 2001 bubble in the same way aol is responsible for 1993 and lehman for 2007 ?
asciilifeform: work that ruins the worker for the company of civilized people, has that effect.
mircea_popescu: now THAT is always & guaranteed "certain degree of believe not what your eyes show you but what the book tells you"
asciilifeform: prolly doomed to become a caste ( in the model of the hindu shit-shoveling-with-bare-hands folx ) , as observed by neal stephenson and others.
asciilifeform: there's a certain level of schizo that goes with the profession
asciilifeform: the point re how a build script taking up moar bytes than a ~bloated~ os took up in 1980s, does not require a genius, to make
phf: well, the bar is set very low
mircea_popescu: dem thoughts dun really seem all that provoked, what can i say.
mircea_popescu: kinda same with p-h kamp (and all the rest of them at that) : hurr durr design, hurr durr thought provoking, herp-derp scripted os-reinstall. nigga... are you a priest or aren't you ?
mircea_popescu: much to his shock and horror, the rearview mirror shows brains and guts scattered everywhere
mircea_popescu: then there's a pedestrian, and the guy, wanting to put a little meat behind his joke, sorta drives the car towards him and steers away at the last minute
mircea_popescu: priest wants to know what is that thing on the hood ? and guy explains slyly that "well, this is a german car, you know, they're a warlike people. so you aim pedestrians with that and well..."
mircea_popescu: you know the story ?
mircea_popescu: whenever i read stuff these people (1990s era graybeards) have to say i always get a feeling of that mercedes-riding-priest.
mircea_popescu: phf what scares me most is what the man who seems to appreciate f p brooks also thinks the "tricks of the trade" are, to verbatim, "test-restoring backups, scripting operating-system installs, version control, etc".
phf: pantsuit publishing doesn't standup to tmsr rigorous and requires certain amount of archeology to get straight
mircea_popescu: alright then that clears that.
mircea_popescu: i thought it was 2000
phf: well, the book was published in 99!
mircea_popescu: if you strike the parens he still says "when book"
phf: i wonder if that bit was added by the editors
mircea_popescu: my first thought, except he says the year, 2001.
phf: mircea_popescu: it's also possible that he's referring to the original publication of esr's essay, that predated the book by couple of years
a111: Logged on 2017-12-03 21:04 BingoBoingo: Well, if this holds up 12500 could be passed when I am in transit
mircea_popescu: http://btcbase.org/log/2017-12-03#1745852 good luck to ye. ☝︎
mircea_popescu: phf but how could it have been published in 2012 if the author thinks it was written in 2014 ?
asciilifeform: in '90s microshit rode the proverbial zundapp-with-mg-sidecar around the killing field, finishing off the wounded.
phf: asciilifeform: "present as just happened" was unintentional, but otherwise that sounds about right, 2012 publication, hackernews thread is from roughly the same time
mircea_popescu: and similarily in the 90s.
asciilifeform: hard to describe the contest as any kind of actual contest after the official usg, err, ibm, blessing of microshit
mircea_popescu: architecturally what's the multics / unics connection ? that both had a shell ?
mircea_popescu: but still. at least cp/m had a rivalry with dos vaguely reminescent of linux/windoze thing
asciilifeform: mircea_popescu: multics, at least mythologically, was the Officially Blessed Liquishit against which t & r pushed back , initially in their spare time
mircea_popescu: anyway, i dun personally see the link between unix and multics beyond "well, thompson and ritchie!!"
asciilifeform: mircea_popescu: to make the matchbox 'computer' wholly unixlike, it ought to occasionally fail to open
asciilifeform: compare tanks from same war, not from 50yr apart, similarly.
asciilifeform: speaking here of items that actually stood as competitors, for however long
a111: Logged on 2016-01-21 19:50 asciilifeform: when you push it, the word правильно (CORRECT)
asciilifeform: why not to spear and bear skin lol
mircea_popescu: but i mean... why not straight to analogics.
asciilifeform: contrast turd, in the heads of the 'unix was beautiful' people
mircea_popescu: 1964 ? how far back can this go
asciilifeform: the original contrast turd was the now-forgotten 'multics'
mircea_popescu: people such as here present will claim that bolix or something like that worked, but i have my reservations. and in any case lispm wasn't "unix", though cathedral alright.
a111: Logged on 2017-12-03 20:42 jurov: What does the "beautiful cathedral of unix" that he uses in a contrast, mean?
mircea_popescu: http://btcbase.org/log/2017-12-03#1745837 << cp/m ? i can't begin to imagine what. ☝︎
asciilifeform: the utter and complete lunacy of 'bazaar' was obvious in 2012. and 2001. and 12, and 1, and there's whole motherfucking biblical parable re the tower etc
mircea_popescu: but otherwise yes, the "bazaar" utter practical failure and completly irredemable theoretical idiocy is an established point.
mircea_popescu: phf i don't understand the dating scheme involved. page says august 15, 2012, text refers to 2001 as "13 years ago" (so was it 2014 ?) and you present it as an event that just happened ? which is it ?
mircea_popescu: “I don't think the appeal to authority fallacy will fly here. We are all too smart for that.” << bwahahaha. two smart by half, the tards.
mircea_popescu: so full excision also acceptable approach. tbh i dun recall this ever having been the problem.
mircea_popescu: also afaik the pngs etc are 100% within ~the theme~ which was not originally bundled.
a111: Logged on 2017-12-03 17:31 phf: http://btcbase.org/log/2017-12-03#1745764 << i recall we ran into the issue of vpatch-ing binaries that hasn't been resolved. wp admin interface relies on a lot of png's and gif's that it's not clear how to stuff into a vpatch without a superfluous "make" phase
mircea_popescu: http://btcbase.org/log/2017-12-03#1745812 << afaik this has been resolved as for eg FG original / future bioses etc. ☝︎
BingoBoingo: asciilifeform: It's the number the gut feeling indicator had a hunch on
a111: Logged on 2017-12-03 17:12 asciilifeform: which somehow (dun ask me) is intended to make folx swallow the crock of shit , rather than wanting to burn whole edifice down ? nfi.
mircea_popescu: http://btcbase.org/log/2017-12-03#1745811 << quite. and it works especially well on idiots, which is to say agents devoid of examinatory capacity. the higher your subjective cost per mile "walked", the more feasible imperial rationalization is. ☝︎
asciilifeform: BingoBoingo: what's interesting re this particular number
BingoBoingo: Well, if this holds up 12500 could be passed when I am in transit ☟︎
asciilifeform: ( granted esr tried to spin it in opposite direction, misleading the easily mislead )
asciilifeform: jurov: term is an esrism, referring to items made with fuhrerprinzip; as opposed to amorphous liquishit from herd
BingoBoingo: Plenty of shitty cathedrals out there, not like we are talking Basillica or anything
jurov: or if, then msdos was even more a cathedral!
jurov: neither deserves to be called cathedral...
asciilifeform: and to d00d who spent entire working life with piles of shit, a small and dried up one is moarbeautiful than a gigantic and steaming pile
jurov: Surely not pervasive use of gets() and "when it segfaults when passed too long line, it's user's fault"?
jurov: What does the "beautiful cathedral of unix" that he uses in a contrast, mean? ☟︎
asciilifeform: ' Sam Leffler's graphics/libtiff is one of the 122 packages on the road to www/firefox, yet the resulting Firefox browser does not render TIFF images. For reasons I have not tried to uncover, 10 of the 122 packages need Perl and seven need Python; one of them, devel/glib20, needs both languages for reasons I cannot even imagine.'
phf: apparently he also argues for fits in head as the only proper measure elsewhere, but i can't find the source of quote (possibly person who implied it is a log reader, and just reused the variety speak)
asciilifeform: whole thing notbad.jpg.
asciilifeform: That is the sorry reality of the bazaar Raymond praised in his book: a pile of old festering hacks, endlessly copied and pasted by a clueless generation of IT "professionals" who wouldn't recognize sound IT architecture if you hit them over the head with it.'
asciilifeform: 'This is probably also why libtool's configure probes no fewer than 26 different names for the Fortran compiler my system does not have, and then spends another 26 tests to find out if each of these nonexistent Fortran compilers supports the -g option.
a111: Logged on 2017-04-04 15:43 asciilifeform: the far bigger boojum is that ~95% of the tarballs include megabytes of autoconf liquishit.
asciilifeform: http://btcbase.org/log/2017-04-04#1637016 << e.g. thread. ☝︎
asciilifeform: 'Needless to say, this is more than most programmers would ever want to put up with, even if they had the skill, so the input files for autoconf happen by copy and paste, often hiding behind increasingly bloated standard macros covering "standard tests" such as those mentioned earlier, which look for compatibility problems not seen in the past 20 years'
phf: phk wrote a get off my lawn rant about cathedral vs. bazaar http://queue.acm.org/detail.cfm?id=2349257 which stirred up the hamsters https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=4407188 favorite quote from thread “I don't think the appeal to authority fallacy will fly here. We are all too smart for that.”
asciilifeform: hashing a la fg does the basic job, of nailing the bins down along with everythingelse
phf: right, that might work, a tar xf into the same vpatch'ed structure (since you need to place those artifacts just right)
asciilifeform: ( it's a somewhat unsatisfying answer, but afaik the only general-purpose pill to date )
phf: i think someone was suggesting converting all the png's and gif's into svg, for example, and other like hacks
a111: Logged on 2017-12-03 11:49 mircea_popescu: and speaking of http://btcbase.org/log/2017-11-15#1739096 : it's my recollection that when i released mp-wp, the deal was somebody picks it up and genesises it. i dun recall right off who, was it you shinohai ? or ben_vulpes ?
phf: http://btcbase.org/log/2017-12-03#1745764 << i recall we ran into the issue of vpatch-ing binaries that hasn't been resolved. wp admin interface relies on a lot of png's and gif's that it's not clear how to stuff into a vpatch without a superfluous "make" phase ☝︎☟︎
asciilifeform: which somehow (dun ask me) is intended to make folx swallow the crock of shit , rather than wanting to burn whole edifice down ? nfi. ☟︎
asciilifeform: mircea_popescu: they operate somewhat like malware obfuscators -- idea, seems, is not to make the sham impenetrable ( this is not physically possible, typically ) but to make the effort of getting to the bottom of every possible idiocy, -ev.
mircea_popescu: "from experience, we want intelligence that's not too intelligent"
mircea_popescu: i guess that's why the appeal of google-ish "ai".
mircea_popescu: "oh, the sort of idiot reading this only goes 3 nodes deep, we make 4 nodes deep nonsense, 100% proof!"