asciilifeform: does mircea_popescu recall the 'auspicious incident' ?
asciilifeform: usa, unlike most orc shitholes, has a well-curated electoral zoo, and this kind of thing is rare. but it happens.
asciilifeform: nobody's defunding lockheed et al. whoever is stubborn enough to bribe diebold et al to keep finger off the cheat button and win, will eat some 'bad shellfish' during some party dinner and that'll be that.
asciilifeform: from my perch, mr t is not electable, unless he mccains and promises, answerable with his arse and his woman-sausages, to play ball, and prolly not then, either.
asciilifeform: (i.e. only on the mempool end? or on both ends ?)
asciilifeform: so outcome would depend on ~where~ they narrowed
asciilifeform: and it will be orphaned unless you can outrun the entire set. i.e. 51%ate.
asciilifeform: but if they 'narrowed protocol' then yes, their existing code will reject your block to build on
asciilifeform: (naturally whether they do or not would depend on whether the cartel specifically targets you for zapping, otherwise it is matter for luck)
asciilifeform: thestringpuller: afaik all of the hardware ~publicly~ sold today, is squarely -ev.
asciilifeform: but dun hold yer breath waiting for it.
asciilifeform: trinque: if one day someone controls serious % of hash rate, and wishes to prove it publicly right here - you will be right, and i - wrong.
asciilifeform: it is only a question of who the chump is in a given operation.
asciilifeform: thestringpuller: mining is -EV and therefore necessarily entails scamming.
asciilifeform: eh if we write to some chinese bloke (and is there a known miner in the WOT? afaik there is not, nor any reason to ever expect there to be),
asciilifeform: thestringpuller: what EXTANT miners CHOOSE to mine, and what COULD be mined, if there were sane folks mining, are quite distinct things.☟︎
asciilifeform also finds it interesting that the locktime nonsense is checked prior to testing the ins
asciilifeform: but notice, never as a consequence of locktime.