FabianB: jurov: didn't know you already forwarded it to mpex
jurov: thestringpusher, why do you think?
thestringpuller: when I have money to hire a sock puppet that is what he/she'll be called
jurov: i do unit test. just left some unlikely scenarios for later, cause i'm lazy.
jurov: now they become more and more likely
FabianB: mircea_popescu: yeah, no-one expected that
FabianB: pirates seem to have high volatility in elections
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 178 @ 0.00062068 = 0.1105 BTC [+]
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 2000 @ 0.00062084 = 1.2417 BTC [+]
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 2300 @ 0.00062385 = 1.4349 BTC [+]
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 7368 @ 0.0006246 = 4.6021 BTC [+]
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 2854 @ 0.00062622 = 1.7872 BTC [+]
assbot: [MPEX] [O.BTCUSD.P140T] 563 @ 0.018824 = 10.5979 BTC [+]
assbot: [MPEX] [O.BTCUSD.P150T] 1000 @ 0.03626506 = 36.2651 BTC [-]
assbot: [MPEX] [O.BTCUSD.P160T] 1000 @ 0.06205928 = 62.0593 BTC [-]
assbot: [MPEX] [O.BTCUSD.P180T] 1000 @ 0.14987357 = 149.8736 BTC [-]
assbot: [MPEX] [O.BTCUSD.P170T] 1000 @ 0.09597135 = 95.9714 BTC [-]
thestringpuller: ya someone is writing contracts to the bot from inventory the dumped from mpoe
thestringpuller: my how I love MPEX, it was like yesterday you were just a baby
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 6286 @ 0.00062622 = 3.9364 BTC [+]
thestringpuller: the price go back up though because so many people want to buy
smickles: < thestringpuller> smickles is havin' internets trouble << more like bitvps is
jurov: thestringpuller, not yet. the mpoe order book still looks scary
Anduck: that pic is not taken off avalon miner
mircea_popescu: Jan 20 22:21:50 <thestringpuller> push them to smickles
mircea_popescu: Jan 20 22:22:01 <mircea_popescu> i can see because of some pixels
mircea_popescu: ;;later bugpowder what did you want to ask about margin ? i missed it at the time, luckily someone mentioned avalon fake pic and i had to dig through logs.
gribble: Error: The "Later" plugin is loaded, but there is no command named "bugpowder" in it. Try "list Later" to see the commands in the "Later" plugin.
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 25600 @ 0.00062622 = 16.0312 BTC [+]
mircea_popescu: ;;later tell bugpowder what did you want to ask about margin ? i missed it at the time, luckily someone mentioned avalon fake pic and i had to dig through logs.
mircea_popescu: you'd think people give it better chances of survival than 2 out of 3 ?
jurov: don't you plan assbot or gribble bbet plugin?
jurov: !bet "Milos Zeman"
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 24100 @ 0.00062622 = 15.0919 BTC [+]
assbot: what do you want anyway, search?
assbot: I don't know those people, and they don't look very friendly.
jurov: !sudo make bitbet interface
smickles_: anyone wanna bet if I last more than 2 min. this time?
jcpham: i imagine a mtgox "out of business" would mostly be a united states vs. mtgox thing
smickles_: thestringpuller: notice I didn't even finish that line b/f it dropped
assbot: You know, I've had it up to here with this Indian malarkey.
jcpham: smickles which datacenter is that vps in
jcpham: switzerland doesn't seem to have that problem fwiw
kakobrekla: no but srsly thestringpuller it has nothing to do with you
kakobrekla: thestringpuller, i just dont approve or resolve bets so i dont get in a way of person that does that
jurov: already contacted them? go to #bitvps
assbot: [MPEX] [S.DICE] 650 @ 0.00515772 = 3.3525 BTC [-]
mircea_popescu: thestringpuller what's your hurry, not like it hits 100 today.
assbot: [MPEX] [S.DICE] 52 @ 0.00522625 = 0.2718 BTC [+]
assbot: I prepared your canoe with cedar boughs.
assbot: [MPEX:S.BBET] 1D: 0.00100008 / 0.00100596 / 0.00129998 (10200 shares, 10.26 BTC), 7D: 0.00100007 / 0.00154533 / 0.0018 (260946 shares, 403.25 BTC), 30D: 0.000337 / 0.00078306 / 0.0035 (2257312 shares, 1,767.63 BTC)
dub: I prepared my canoe with sonar yesterday
dub: going to lay waste to some fish this arfternoon
assbot: Yes smickles__, I'm smart like that.
jurov: wait till it starts asking for help
gribble: You have not yet rated user assbot
jurov: ;;rate assbot -10 scammer
gribble: Error: For identification purposes, you must be identified via GPG to use the rating system.
assbot: [MPEX] [S.DICE] 3250 @ 0.00525495 = 17.0786 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [BASIC-MINING] 18 @ 0.339 = 6.102 BTC [+]
jurov: ;;getrating assbot
gribble: This user has not yet been rated. WARNING: Currently not authenticated.
jurov: is he old enough for toilet training?
mircea_popescu: smickles is like, on dial-up. and some friendly 70yo neighbour keeps picking up the receiver.
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 24000 @ 0.00062532 = 15.0077 BTC [-]
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 12376 @ 0.00062149 = 7.6916 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [RSM] 117 @ 0.0085 = 0.9945 BTC [-]
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 2300 @ 0.00062149 = 1.4294 BTC [-]
assbot: [MPEX] [O.BTCUSD.P170T] 820 @ 0.09472763 = 77.6767 BTC [-]
assbot: [MPEX] [O.BTCUSD.P160T] 1000 @ 0.06097484 = 60.9748 BTC [-]
assbot: [MPEX] [O.BTCUSD.P150T] 1000 @ 0.03541299 = 35.413 BTC [-]
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 1815 @ 0.00062045 = 1.1261 BTC [+]
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 8884 @ 0.00062249 = 5.5302 BTC [+]
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 25414 @ 0.00062277 = 15.8271 BTC [+]
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 32090 @ 0.00062388 = 20.0203 BTC [+]
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 3190 @ 0.000625 = 1.9938 BTC [+]
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 3643 @ 0.000625 = 2.2769 BTC [+]
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 9311 @ 0.00062507 = 5.82 BTC [+]
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 1373 @ 0.00061743 = 0.8477 BTC [-]
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 6831 @ 0.00061058 = 4.1709 BTC [-]
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 2496 @ 0.00060969 = 1.5218 BTC [-]
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 19189 @ 0.00062507 = 11.9945 BTC [+]
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 6206 @ 0.00062622 = 3.8863 BTC [+]
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 15000 @ 0.00062649 = 9.3974 BTC [+]
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 21100 @ 0.00062886 = 13.2689 BTC [+]
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 5200 @ 0.00063047 = 3.2784 BTC [+]
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 5605 @ 0.0006312 = 3.5379 BTC [+]
assbot: [MPEX] [S.DICE] 1600 @ 0.00525495 = 8.4079 BTC [+]
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 6383 @ 0.00061811 = 3.9454 BTC [-]
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 5517 @ 0.00061811 = 3.4101 BTC [-]
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 9491 @ 0.00061522 = 5.8391 BTC [-]
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 7320 @ 0.00060969 = 4.4629 BTC [-]
assbot: [MPEX] [O.BTCUSD.C200T] 15 @ 0.05139051 = 0.7709 BTC [+]
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 5450 @ 0.00060969 = 3.3228 BTC [-]
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 4100 @ 0.00060969 = 2.4997 BTC [-]
assbot: [MPEX:S.DICE] 1D: 0.00481977 / 0.00513888 / 0.00525495 (42792 shares, 219.90 BTC), 7D: 0.00449034 / 0.00478954 / 0.00598999 (1891602 shares, 9,059.91 BTC), 30D: 0.0032 / 0.00414851 / 0.00598999 (9437928 shares, 39,153.42 BTC)
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 2506 @ 0.00060969 = 1.5279 BTC [-]
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 8350 @ 0.00060884 = 5.0838 BTC [-]
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 1644 @ 0.00060756 = 0.9988 BTC [-]
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 12756 @ 0.00060756 = 7.75 BTC [-]
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 4409 @ 0.00060731 = 2.6776 BTC [-]
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 12423 @ 0.00060731 = 7.5446 BTC [-]
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 2827 @ 0.00060336 = 1.7057 BTC [-]
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 4436 @ 0.00060336 = 2.6765 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [COGNITIVE] 2 @ 0.405 = 0.81 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [COGNITIVE] 5 @ 0.4 = 2 BTC [-]
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 10787 @ 0.00060336 = 6.5084 BTC [-]
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 2800 @ 0.00060287 = 1.688 BTC [-]
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 41300 @ 0.0006017 = 24.8502 BTC [-]
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 10263 @ 0.00060168 = 6.175 BTC [-]
assbot: [MPEX] [S.DICE] 300 @ 0.00518427 = 1.5553 BTC [-]
assbot: [MPEX] [S.DICE] 2116 @ 0.00525495 = 11.1195 BTC [+]
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 6050 @ 0.00061091 = 3.696 BTC [+]
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 6792 @ 0.00061091 = 4.1493 BTC [+]
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 11708 @ 0.00061091 = 7.1525 BTC [+]
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 5192 @ 0.00061096 = 3.1721 BTC [+]
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 1661 @ 0.00060168 = 0.9994 BTC [-]
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 3846 @ 0.00060168 = 2.3141 BTC [-]
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [KCIM] 1 @ 0.999 BTC [+]
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 1500 @ 0.00060344 = 0.9052 BTC [+]
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 15400 @ 0.00060344 = 9.293 BTC [+]
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 475 @ 0.00060168 = 0.2858 BTC [-]
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 8250 @ 0.00060146 = 4.962 BTC [-]
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 7975 @ 0.00060122 = 4.7947 BTC [-]
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 9300 @ 0.00060123 = 5.5914 BTC [+]
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 250 @ 0.00060123 = 0.1503 BTC [+]
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 8397 @ 0.00060122 = 5.0484 BTC [-]
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 16000 @ 0.00060262 = 9.6419 BTC [+]
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 5079 @ 0.00060122 = 3.0536 BTC [-]
assbot: [MPEX] [S.DICE] 432 @ 0.0053219 = 2.2991 BTC [+]
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 8100 @ 0.00060122 = 4.8699 BTC [-]
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 15000 @ 0.00060123 = 9.0185 BTC [+]
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 1250 @ 0.00060122 = 0.7515 BTC [-]
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 7300 @ 0.00060262 = 4.3991 BTC [+]
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 4700 @ 0.00060262 = 2.8323 BTC [+]
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 8400 @ 0.00060344 = 5.0689 BTC [+]
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 3579 @ 0.00060893 = 2.1794 BTC [+]
assbot: [MPEX] [S.DICE] 1500 @ 0.00530239 = 7.9536 BTC [-]
assbot: [MPEX] [S.DICE] 247 @ 0.00530238 = 1.3097 BTC [-]
assbot: [MPEX] [S.DICE] 309 @ 0.00525 = 1.6223 BTC [-]
kakobrekla: Infiniti Poker Set to Go Live in February: Will Use Bitcoins for Americans
kakobrekla: “Because we’re using Bitcoin, we’re not using U.S. banks—it’s all peer-to-peer,” Hajduk told BusinessWeek.com in regard to fears over potentially breaking current US laws. “I don’t believe we’ll be doing anything wrong.
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 578 @ 0.00060122 = 0.3475 BTC [-]
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 14222 @ 0.0006011 = 8.5488 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [GSDPT] 6 @ 0.0055 = 0.033 BTC [-]
assbot: [MPEX] [S.DICE] 420 @ 0.00525 = 2.205 BTC [-]
assbot: [MPEX] [S.DICE] 852 @ 0.00524149 = 4.4657 BTC [-]
jurov: thestringpuller, sry i usually don't respond to summons at 04:29 CET
gribble: BTCUSD ticker | Best bid: 16.40637, Best ask: 16.53418, Bid-ask spread: 0.12781, Last trade: 16.39526, 24 hour volume: 36457.34278264, 24 hour low: 15.63412, 24 hour high: 16.70000, 24 hour vwap: 15.99778
kakobrekla: lol i just realized, i have a single customer that is larger than whole 1Broker
jurov: hehe yes it happens :)
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 24991 @ 0.00060232 = 15.0526 BTC [+]
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 6600 @ 0.00060738 = 4.0087 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ESECURITYSABTC] 10 @ 0.72 = 7.2 BTC [-]
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 2809 @ 0.00060804 = 1.708 BTC [+]
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 3306 @ 0.0006011 = 1.9872 BTC [-]
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 6600 @ 0.00060071 = 3.9647 BTC [-]
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 7200 @ 0.00060061 = 4.3244 BTC [-]
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 5435 @ 0.00060008 = 3.2614 BTC [-]
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 11015 @ 0.00060008 = 6.6099 BTC [-]
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 8685 @ 0.0006 = 5.211 BTC [-]
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [SDICE] 2 @ 0.57 = 1.14 BTC [+]
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 20750 @ 0.0006 = 12.45 BTC [-]
assbot: [MPEX] [S.DICE] 884 @ 0.0053 = 4.6852 BTC [+]
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 7800 @ 0.00060893 = 4.7497 BTC [+]
gribble: BTCUSD ticker | Best bid: 16.10000, Best ask: 16.10997, Bid-ask spread: 0.00997, Last trade: 16.10000, 24 hour volume: 44684.00628135, 24 hour low: 15.63412, 24 hour high: 16.70000, 24 hour vwap: 16.08003
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 7000 @ 0.00060419 = 4.2293 BTC [-]
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 3135 @ 0.00060223 = 1.888 BTC [-]
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 11244 @ 0.0006 = 6.7464 BTC [-]
assbot: [MPEX:S.DICE] 1D: 0.004901 / 0.00517549 / 0.0053219 (39777 shares, 205.87 BTC), 7D: 0.00449034 / 0.00479683 / 0.00598999 (1839870 shares, 8,825.55 BTC), 30D: 0.0032 / 0.00414935 / 0.00598999 (9444988 shares, 39,190.63 BTC)
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 24150 @ 0.0006 = 14.49 BTC [-]
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 15490 @ 0.00060419 = 9.3589 BTC [+]
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 18800 @ 0.0006 = 11.28 BTC [-]
gribble: BTCUSD ticker | Best bid: 16.36843, Best ask: 16.45598, Bid-ask spread: 0.08755, Last trade: 16.45598, 24 hour volume: 46012.49478065, 24 hour low: 15.63412, 24 hour high: 16.70000, 24 hour vwap: 16.09633
assbot: [MPEX] [S.DICE] 1650 @ 0.0052699 = 8.6953 BTC [-]
gribble: BTCUSD ticker | Best bid: 16.49001, Best ask: 16.49100, Bid-ask spread: 0.00099, Last trade: 16.49000, 24 hour volume: 46183.98018035, 24 hour low: 15.63412, 24 hour high: 16.70000, 24 hour vwap: 16.09854
gribble: There are currently 0 bitcoins demanded at or over 16.45 USD, worth 0.0 USD in total.
gribble: BTCUSD ticker | Best bid: 16.56000, Best ask: 16.60000, Bid-ask spread: 0.04000, Last trade: 16.60000, 24 hour volume: 46667.37538040, 24 hour low: 15.63412, 24 hour high: 16.70000, 24 hour vwap: 16.10462
Bugpowder: If it can break thru 17... game over man
assbot: [MPEX] [S.DICE] 69 @ 0.0052699 = 0.3636 BTC [-]
assbot: [MPEX] [S.DICE] 310 @ 0.00524149 = 1.6249 BTC [-]
assbot: [MPEX] [S.DICE] 2600 @ 0.00523251 = 13.6045 BTC [-]
assbot: [MPEX] [S.DICE] 221 @ 0.00521186 = 1.1518 BTC [-]
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 1435 @ 0.00060419 = 0.867 BTC [+]
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 37533 @ 0.00060893 = 22.855 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [COGNITIVE] 1 @ 0.39 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [COGNITIVE] 1 @ 0.3508 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [COGNITIVE] 10 @ 0.3501 = 3.501 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [COGNITIVE] 3 @ 0.3301 = 0.9903 BTC [-]
assbot: [MPEX] [S.BVPS] 1270 @ 0.0013 = 1.651 BTC [+]
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 9850 @ 0.00060298 = 5.9394 BTC [-]
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 200 @ 0.00060142 = 0.1203 BTC [-]
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 4850 @ 0.00060142 = 2.9169 BTC [-]
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 14867 @ 0.0006 = 8.9202 BTC [-]
assbot: [MPEX] [S.DICE] 2129 @ 0.00521186 = 11.096 BTC [-]
assbot: [MPEX] [S.DICE] 867 @ 0.00520934 = 4.5165 BTC [-]
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 8800 @ 0.00060472 = 5.3215 BTC [+]
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 1504 @ 0.0006 = 0.9024 BTC [-]
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 3595 @ 0.00059978 = 2.1562 BTC [-]
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 1565 @ 0.00059978 = 0.9387 BTC [-]
assbot: [MPEX] [S.DICE] 116 @ 0.0053 = 0.6148 BTC [+]
assbot: [MPEX] [S.DICE] 93 @ 0.0053219 = 0.4949 BTC [+]
assbot: [MPEX] [S.DICE] 1991 @ 0.00533151 = 10.615 BTC [+]
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 6050 @ 0.00059978 = 3.6287 BTC [-]
gribble: BTCUSD ticker | Best bid: 16.73735, Best ask: 16.84332, Bid-ask spread: 0.10597, Last trade: 16.73533, 24 hour volume: 52756.17100206, 24 hour low: 15.63412, 24 hour high: 16.98000, 24 hour vwap: 16.18763
Korbman: Wait..what? I looked just the other day and it was $15.70...now you're trying to tell me we're reaching $17?
assbot: [BTCTC] [GOLD] 1 @ 1.05 BTC [-]
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 16188 @ 0.00060893 = 9.8574 BTC [+]
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 408 @ 0.00061096 = 0.2493 BTC [+]
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 6672 @ 0.00061217 = 4.0844 BTC [+]
gribble: BTCUSD ticker | Best bid: 16.78819, Best ask: 16.94860, Bid-ask spread: 0.16041, Last trade: 16.94859, 24 hour volume: 53194.02273291, 24 hour low: 15.63412, 24 hour high: 16.98000, 24 hour vwap: 16.19784
Bugpowder: I doubt we break thru 17. Asks are evaporating now
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 6238 @ 0.00059978 = 3.7414 BTC [-]
Korbman: I didn't think we'd get this high to begin with (at least not as quickly)...so it doesn't surprise me the bids are slowing down
assbot: [MPEX] [S.DICE] 1363 @ 0.00520934 = 7.1003 BTC [-]
Bugpowder: well some of the bids got impatient, and just went for the ask instead
Bugpowder: Still tons of support at 15.60 and 16.10
Bugpowder: The MPOE market bot is undervaluing the calls right now too... 70 cent difference between vwap and current
assbot: [BTCTC] [RSM] 81 @ 0.0085 = 0.6885 BTC [-]
assbot: [MPEX] [S.DICE] 993 @ 0.00517224 = 5.136 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [RSM] 145 @ 0.0089 = 1.2905 BTC [+]
JWU_42: walls are forming at 17
JWU_42: and not much to take us back to 16.50
Bugpowder: But my C160Ts really want us to be at 18.
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 12550 @ 0.00059978 = 7.5272 BTC [-]
jurov: but why s.mpoe shareholders had to chose this time to cash out
assbot: [MPEX] [S.DICE] 244 @ 0.00517224 = 1.262 BTC [-]
Bugpowder: cause MPOE is gonna have a bad week if the price keeps going up (I guess)
jcpham: looks like it will not stop any time soon
jcpham: the bulls want to break every piece of china in the shop.
assbot: [BTCTC] [BTC-TRADING-PT] 10 @ 0.1432 = 1.432 BTC [-]
jurov: if it goes only up, it won't be such a bit problem, maybe bonds pay only a half of MPBOR
jurov: but if it decides to swing to, say, 13, now that would be a problem
jurov: mircea, bitcoinica is shipping
jurov: ..er...mixed that up :/
gribble: BTCUSD ticker | Best bid: 16.75000, Best ask: 16.77669, Bid-ask spread: 0.02669, Last trade: 16.75000, 24 hour volume: 54418.34696679, 24 hour low: 15.63412, 24 hour high: 16.98000, 24 hour vwap: 16.21918
jcpham: 2 units shipped over the weekend: one to jgarzik, one to bitcoin foundation
jcpham: i assume 300 more to random miners
jcpham: not yet to my knowlege
jcpham: i think i deserve the 140BTC or so
jcpham: i've been thinking on it
jcpham: i only need to convince one other judge of the same
assbot: [BTCTC] [COGNITIVE] 3 @ 0.4 = 1.2 BTC [+]
mircea_popescu: R Company Sales/mth $ Profit/yr BTC Profit/yr Industry link
jcpham: EskimoBob go fuck yourself that was a joke
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 6450 @ 0.00060007 = 3.8705 BTC [+]
jcpham: mircea_popescu in the last post it looks like the signature line is cut off:
assbot: [BTCTC] [BTC-TRADING-PT] 10 @ 0.1432 = 1.432 BTC [-]
jcpham: line starts like: HBNlxhUDnEKbMl1p082ergE+ekRZINRmr12/DpZQy0sODhxGTE40HukSnPL+mQDDy8yg+bjQb
mircea_popescu: Signature: HBNlxhUDnEKbMl1p082ergE+ekRZINRmr12/DpZQy0sODhxGTE40HukSnPL+mQDDy8yg+bjQblA+NsJeI3XyoEs=
jcpham: I believe I need to verify that. thanks
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 17867 @ 0.00060823 = 10.8672 BTC [+]
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 2700 @ 0.00060823 = 1.6422 BTC [+]
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 4300 @ 0.00060823 = 2.6154 BTC [+]
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 1950 @ 0.00060558 = 1.1809 BTC [-]
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 22552 @ 0.00059978 = 13.5262 BTC [-]
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 3498 @ 0.00059924 = 2.0961 BTC [-]
assbot: [MPEX] [O.BTCUSD.P160T] 777 @ 0.04160326 = 32.3257 BTC [-]
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 14500 @ 0.00059924 = 8.689 BTC [-]
pigeons: EskimoBob: i nominated jcpham because he would be less likely to be viewed as a sock puppet than kako who is a business partner of mp and i know smickles has done deals with him too
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 6152 @ 0.00059924 = 3.6865 BTC [-]
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 27628 @ 0.00059908 = 16.5514 BTC [-]
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 18900 @ 0.00059845 = 11.3107 BTC [-]
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 10670 @ 0.0005984 = 6.3849 BTC [-]
pigeons: EskimoBob: and jcpham is talking about convincing one other judge to rule against MP, which doesnt seem to need any convincing anytwasy
assbot: [BTCTC] [GSDPT] 10 @ 0.0055 = 0.055 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [BTC-TRADING-PT] 1 @ 0.1432 BTC [-]
jcpham: mircea_popescu the rota has decided to rip you off
jcpham: i hope you are happy :)
Bugpowder: I estimate Mtgox only makes 100,000 BTC /year
assbot: [MPEX] [S.DICE] 756 @ 0.0052 = 3.9312 BTC [+]
assbot: [MPEX] [S.DICE] 244 @ 0.00516178 = 1.2595 BTC [-]
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 11900 @ 0.0005984 = 7.121 BTC [-]
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 122 @ 0.00060823 = 0.0742 BTC [+]
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 8667 @ 0.00061217 = 5.3057 BTC [+]
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 3388 @ 0.00061302 = 2.0769 BTC [+]
jcpham: mircea_popescu does payment for the rota come from the fees paid by the claimant and defendant (you)
jcpham: or was this the intention or not
jcpham: we are unsure if we should we should pay ourselves from the fees
jcpham: which might seem greedy but i'll ask it
mircea_popescu: the prevailing party gets up to 10 btc back (depending what % of their claim is granted)
jcpham: are we to judge our own dsalary is my question
mircea_popescu: the losing party gets nothing. the judges get 3 btc each.
Bugpowder: How much of their $50,000 / month operating costs is salaries to the owner
Bugpowder: They say their server costs are $5,000 / mo
Bugpowder: where is the other $45k / mo going?
Bugpowder: They pay out the revenue to employee salary most likely
Bugpowder: Angel should not have more than 20% equity
Bugpowder: I started paying attention to btc when it hit $7 the first time
Bugpowder: Only had a gox account for about a year
mircea_popescu: well anyway, originalyl site started by some guy in the us
assbot: [BTCTC] [RSM] 98 @ 0.0089 = 0.8722 BTC [+]
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 6265 @ 0.00060205 = 3.7718 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [RSM] 14 @ 0.009 = 0.126 BTC [+]
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 5685 @ 0.0005984 = 3.4019 BTC [-]
jurov_: mircea_popescu, primitive as opposed to what ?
jurov_: to the wannabe Rule Of Law irl?
mircea_popescu: jurov_ relationships based on tribal structures rather than flow of capital, law and ownership
jurov: and how would that happen? as long as majority of players are anonymous, there is no real incentive to follow the law
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 22500 @ 0.0005984 = 13.464 BTC [-]
jurov: i tried to reconcile that when i thought about the gpg story, but no. people just are dishonorable thieves when they can.
mircea_popescu: for most of history people could be dishonorable thieves and mostly were not.
mircea_popescu: i think this is a convenient statal lie, to justify the historically incredible levels of taxation.
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 1017 @ 0.00060205 = 0.6123 BTC [+]
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 8217 @ 0.00060947 = 5.008 BTC [+]
jurov: then why the first reaction to state failure is often looting?
jurov: don't know if it's true but i heard in romania even central heating equipment was stolen in some places
jurov: when communist regime fell
mircea_popescu: for the same reason takling away the prop of a tree leads to tree colapsing
mircea_popescu: this doesn't prove trees can't grow on their own trunks
jurov: i don't see how the argument relates.. it was not like something completely vital was removed during the '89 revolution
assbot: [MPEX] [S.DICE] 600 @ 0.00533727 = 3.2024 BTC [+]
mircea_popescu: something completely vital was removed for the red decades
mircea_popescu: once the ersatz collapsed the impression was that there's something missing.
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 7667 @ 0.00060947 = 4.6728 BTC [+]
jurov: lol, show me any significant group of people that can exist outside of state without "impression that there's something missing"
assbot: [BTCTC] [BASIC-MINING] 4 @ 0.34 = 1.36 BTC [+]
jurov: yes, provided there are no armed groups roaming the landscape
jurov: last 60 years in europe are an exception in this regard
jurov: you mean in america?
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 2150 @ 0.0005984 = 1.2866 BTC [-]
jurov: good example. it mostly appeared to work cause there was no competition for food/land...
jurov: but maybe at expense to slaves/natives
jurov: i don't know 'merica history, dunno how many people were actually violently killed there
jurov: just got the feeling that ability to call 911 was welcomed even there
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 6000 @ 0.00059841 = 3.5905 BTC [+]
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 15650 @ 0.0005984 = 9.365 BTC [-]
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [SDICE] 1 @ 0.53 BTC [-]
mircea_popescu: what do you think made barbed wire such a commercial success
jurov: barbed wire? used in american old west? you lost me again
dub: missed the start of this conversation
dub: but the problem with humans is we are naturally peices of shit
jurov: i'd say yurp built on competition for food and land... when it got unbearable, everyone went to us since it was supposedly much better there
dub: once you put enough of us in close proximity we will rob rape and kill each other
jcpham: especially if food is in short supply
dub: which means you need some policing which implies a state
jcpham: if you force me to live in close proximity with people
jcpham: i would probably attempt to dominate my peers or control them
jcpham: C cup and larger against that wall
jcpham: strong men over here against this wall
dub: well, _you_ would because of your conditioning, that success must be at teh expense of your peers
jcpham: everyone would be a resource for me to assign
dub: even without our existing societal fuck up, humans cannot coexist en masse
assbot: [BTCTC] [COGNITIVE] 1 @ 0.3999 BTC [-]
mircea_popescu: jcpham the dispute of cattle vs farm was settled by barbed wire
assbot: [BTCTC] [COGNITIVE] 4 @ 0.4 = 1.6 BTC [+]
jcpham: the 'ol fence trick, eh?
jcpham: round 'em up and stick them in a fence?
assbot: [BTCTC] [BASIC-MINING] 2 @ 0.34 = 0.68 BTC [+]
jurov: anyway, i think when i'd pick random person that lived 60 to 6000 years ago and explained about how oppressive is the modern state i currently live in
jurov: i'd get unbelieving stare, perhaps
jurov: not that it can't be improved... but removing it completely, srsly?
jcpham: removing a lot of these societal structures implies a lot of death
mircea_popescu: listen, killing someione is not the trivial matter it appears to be in video games.
mircea_popescu: even if given free reign to kill anyone at any time most people couldn't be arsed.
jurov: lol, maybe he'd agree that inability to treat wives as property is kinda oppressing :DDD
assbot: [MPEX] [O.BTCUSD.C140T] 5 @ 0.15725077 = 0.7863 BTC [+]
jcpham: i mean death as in people who cannot provide for themselves
jcpham: without society and technology
jcpham: and who will surely waste away or be overtaken by others
pigeons: well, or else people who want to help "people who cannot provide for themselves" won't have GovCo in the way and can help them
jcpham: if we all were required to produce something to be usefull, many of us might be in trouble
jcpham: assume you have an alotment of fresh air
jcpham: that costs some personal production
jcpham: you want to breathe, contribute.
jcpham: i'm telling you fresh water futures and clean air
jcpham: someone will mop up one day
pigeons: first we need to get rid of that meddling lorax
jurov: jcpham, funnily enough that was a communist idea that everyone must be employed and producing
jcpham: i somewhat agree with it
dub: the hilarious thing about libertarians and anti-state crowd
jcpham: the worls is full of producers and consumers
jcpham: consumers far far far outweigh producers
dub: is the root of it is they think that because they are a beautiful and unique snowflake they will somehow do a better job than 'the state'
dub: when its that inherently selfish nature of humanity that is the reason we need it
mircea_popescu: after all, they're smart enough to have figured it out first!
jcpham: i agree that i am an entirely selfish human
jcpham: much more so now that i have a fmily
dub: its a human trait, you don't own it you selfish bastard
dub: I AM THE ONLY SELFISH ONE< YOU WILL DIE NOW
jcpham: how can we bet on this now?
jcpham: can we make a selfishness bet
dub: I have a good one, by 2050 there will be less than half as many humans as today
dub: that wil prove it nicely
dub: and if we are around to collect, well we already won so we wont need to
mircea_popescu: i will personally impregnate a billionty womenz to win this bet.
iz: dub: ever heard of the prisoner's dilemma?
iz: in a non-zero sum game, the "selfish" move also helps everyone else
assbot: [MPEX] [S.DICE] 1750 @ 0.0053558 = 9.3727 BTC [+]
iz: it means that hurting your opponent doesn't help you.. that's non-zero sum
mircea_popescu: jcpham pigeons i hope you realise the net result of this will simply be me putting it in the faq that i will keep all misrouted funds and fu.
iz: games like chess or checkers, are zero sum, where hurting your opponent directly helps you
iz: it's not above zero, below zero, or zero
assbot: [MPEX] [S.DICE] 2075 @ 0.0053558 = 11.1133 BTC [+]
jcpham: mircea_popescu is our judgement not "fair"
mircea_popescu: it's particularly dumb, in that it allows idiots to extract money from me now.
jcpham: 9 to judges leaving 11
jcpham: fair is to split the 11btc
assbot: [BTCTC] [MININGCO.ETF] 2 @ 0.5 = 1 BTC
jcpham: now you can just tell everyone the orta sucks
jcpham: we are all just scamsters
jcpham: i'd also be willing to forego payment to make the situation "correct"
jcpham: didn't seem like an avaialble option though
mircea_popescu: you just allocated the cost of fucking up to me, and i'm not the one who fucked up.
jcpham: that's just me i'm speaking for
jcpham: if you send me a bill for your losses i can make payments until you recover fully
mod6: this is the dumbest ruling in virtual case law
mircea_popescu: i guess it at least proves they be independent ninnies.
jcpham: i think mre preparation or organization is required
mod6: you guys need to think about what you're doing
mircea_popescu: dawg, independence is this concept whereby people think autonomously
assbot: [MPEX] [S.DICE] 500 @ 0.00534198 = 2.671 BTC [-]
assbot: [MPEX] [S.DICE] 850 @ 0.00534197 = 4.5407 BTC [-]
assbot: [MPEX] [S.DICE] 1446 @ 0.00524041 = 7.5776 BTC [-]
jcpham: i suppose it is too late now
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 9684 @ 0.00060947 = 5.9021 BTC [+]
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 11366 @ 0.00060971 = 6.93 BTC [+]
jurov: whatever. i was organizing international summercamp, bank asked us the fee to sort out payments with incomplete info
jurov: i doubt if i'd get anything if we sued
mircea_popescu: right. cause the bank won't do the insane sort of shit i do
mod6: what a bunch of asshats
jcpham: fwiw i started to penalize you both equally
mod6: omfg why did you ask to do this?!?!?!
jcpham: jesus told me to apply
jcpham: why are you upset mod6
mircea_popescu: ima hold rota entrance exams, consisting of reciting cicero and laurian in latin
jcpham: mircea_popescu will keep the funds in the future
jcpham: so he won't even need the rota
jcpham: seems like a win-win for a few btc
jcpham: sortof an early precednet
jcpham: hopefully I won'r be nominated anymore because i'm just insane
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 10284 @ 0.00060971 = 6.2703 BTC [+]
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 4766 @ 0.00061235 = 2.9185 BTC [+]
jurov: bah, "judges" nobody asked about the "mispaid/rounded orders create significant overhead"?
jurov: like, is it so significant as to justfy keeping whole amount?
jurov: occupy? now it's clear to me.
jcpham: occupy movement..... huh
jurov: jcpham, do ask, i'm curious. maybe the overhead includes doing something interesting with the bitches
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 7785 @ 0.00060287 = 4.6933 BTC [-]
mod6: (11:25) < mircea_popescu> ima hold rota entrance exams, consisting of reciting cicero and laurian in latin
mod6: otherwise this just creates way more problems then it solves
mod6: we can't have these dunderhead rulings being created when people have no idea what they're even doing
mircea_popescu: <mod6> otherwise this just creates way more problems then it solves << i am grasped by sudden terror at the realisation of that, yes.
mod6: rip it up and start again
mod6: im srsly irk'd by this
mod6: the plaintiff fucked up. his funds should be returned minus fees. nothing more.
dub: who initiated the rota action?
mod6: nothing less. this is idiotic.
pigeons: yeah i wanted punititve damages against mircea_popescu for wasting our time, using the rota as a promotion, and forcing customers to sue him just to get typical service
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 934 @ 0.00061235 = 0.5719 BTC [+]
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 16495 @ 0.00061302 = 10.1118 BTC [+]
mircea_popescu: pigeons yeah well, you sorta misunderstand what this is all for.
mod6: i really thought the court was a great idea, actually. now i just see that we don't have the foresight/legal wisdom to carry it out
mod6: this is more important then that is
mod6: that still will be over in the not too distant future, this is the future
jcpham: what good is talking going to do now
jcpham: if i'm not allowed to change anything
jcpham: i mean, I don't like the format myself
jcpham: the blog posting and whatnjot
dub: sorry why was the rota engaged?
dub: dude sent wrong amount, it seemed like mircea_popescu was trying to help him sort it out
jcpham: i'm not feeling mad, I'm feeling as if I disappointed someone
dub: did he then demand rota justice or did mircea_popescu
jcpham: regardless, someone was going to get disappointed
pigeons: it was engaged because instead of mircea_popescu just being a normal human, he used a customer service case to not fix the issue so he could force his customer to sue him to get justice, just so he could promote his rota
assbot: [MPEX] [S.BBET] 5000 @ 0.00100013 = 5.0007 BTC [+]
assbot: [MPEX] [S.BBET] 1000 @ 0.00100012 = 1.0001 BTC [-]
assbot: [MPEX] [S.BBET] 230 @ 0.00100011 = 0.23 BTC [-]
assbot: [MPEX] [S.BBET] 500 @ 0.0010001 = 0.5001 BTC [-]
assbot: [MPEX] [S.BBET] 500 @ 0.00100009 = 0.5 BTC [-]
assbot: [MPEX] [S.BBET] 770 @ 0.00100006 = 0.77 BTC [-]
jcpham: which is fine by me and we obviously did a bad job
jurov: like, it's totally the mission of a judge to please everyone
jcpham: so what's the point now? to learn from it
jcpham: FWIW i 'm not seeing any volunteers
jcpham: you have about 11 months to get your shit together
dub: its obviously the guys fault but forcing the rota to deal with it is not good for either rota or mpex imo
pigeons: if you are going to make a point that people can use your rota and it is a good alternative dispute method, forcing the issue on something like this when you just should have credited the dide without all the hassle is shitty
mircea_popescu: pigeons i should have credited the dude w/o the hassle ?
jurov: pigeons, it would be good if you included the reasoning in your judgement
mircea_popescu: he's absolutely the last guy who sends ANY ammt to mpex and gets crtedited.
pigeons: my reasoning was included,
pigeons: "MPex does disclaim responsibility for customer errors in depositing, but correcting this error is a reasonable part of fiduciary duty."
jcpham: the problem is the fees, not the deposit
jcpham: that's where the uncertainty is
jcpham: to me, the fee is negligible given the deposit amount
pigeons: i wanted to include that i thought the rota was a good idea and didnt expect mircea_popescu would pt barnum it
jcpham: but i see now it is not negligble at al
jcpham: the fee is just a bonus
jcpham: we're talking about .00005 at max bitcoin transaction
mircea_popescu: pigeons the reason nobody was using it was (i understand now) the justified fear that people are not equipped to judge.
jcpham: in fees for the 130 btc
mircea_popescu: sadly this was proven true, luckily it was proven true on a modest case of little import.
jcpham: for all the ORTA fees are just icing on the cake
dub: so does MP get the neg rating?
jcpham: the 20 btc in fees is icing on the cake for someone
dub: or just the 100btc loss
pigeons: jcpham: explain the fees thing
jcpham: so we think or we know it was his funds and we decide to return the funds
jcpham: straight away once that decision is made, the fess are what decides everything
pigeons: i know it says dont fuck up your deposits, and im careful cause i know mircea_popescu will keep it, but if he's gonna use this to try to push his rota, well fact is it is a breach of fiduciary duty it is totally reasonable to fix this when shown proof
jcpham: also the whole fiduciary duty claim is only relevant given non-refund
mircea_popescu: but i'm not happy with how it works, so i won't do it in the future.
dub: mircea_popescu: what changed?
jcpham: so assume we determine the funds to be his, and we also determine that funds will be returned, there is no breach
dub: about considering refunding him if/when shown proof
mircea_popescu: dub historically if you sent the wrong amt you're fucked.
pigeons: mircea_popescu could have settled with the guy then there was no breach
mircea_popescu: it failed to work, so i'm going back to what historically worked very well.
dub: mircea_popescu: I don't understand how the rota could change that, its your policy
pigeons: but mircea_popescu forced him to sue cause mircea_popescu wanted to promote his rota, and we are his pawns in that
dub: the rota is a binary decision maker, not a policy generating device
jcpham: mircea_popescu did wences ask for his money back
jcpham: i assumed that he DID NOT
jcpham: i'm not discussing this anymore
pigeons: we are a cheap customer service department for him
dub: I don;t understand how it went from trying to help the guy to rota
jurov: pigeons, did you ask about logs between mircea and wences? to confirm if mircea forced him to sue ?
jurov: or it's just your assumption?
jcpham: now i know that i need to interrogate everyone
pigeons: jurov: i asked mircea_popescu
pigeons: it is also in the comments on the general rota post
pigeons: changing the policy via the rota?
jcpham: it was understanding that the parties didn't try to resolve it amicably - straight to rota, no discussion
jcpham: now that i know discussion came before the rota case
pigeons: no, mircea_popescu coached wences on how to format his claim
jcpham: i'm much more firm in my decison
jcpham: fucking precedent or not
pigeons: i didnt mind the keep your money policy too much but he made him bring this case, and no way i can find that it is reasonable in this instance
dub: it makes no sense if that is true
pigeons: mircea_popescu: the problem is this isn't an organic dispute, you would have paid the guy, but you decided if you made him go through the rota you would get publicity for it
pigeons: ok then the rota did its job
dub: mircea_popescu: it says in your sumbission that you would be prepared to pay him
pigeons: i thought mircea_popescu's submission was an offer to settle without going through this, but when i spoke with him he said no
mircea_popescu: next time someone tries that i'll just ignore it and that's the end of that story.
mircea_popescu: basically yay rota, it managed to lock itself out of pretty much the only subject matter anyone thought it worthy of considering
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [SDICE] 39 @ 0.53 = 20.67 BTC [-]
dub: mircea_popescu: that doesnt make an sense, your policy is that he would not be refunded, why would that change during a rota case?
mircea_popescu: not entirely sure if that means it'll just die in a corner somewhere, but seems quite likely.
pigeons: if rota decided with what you agreed, you would have made it policy
pigeons: and used the rota to back your policy
dub: I think this is actually a win for mircea_popescu
pigeons: but since it decided against you it isnt good policy what the rota decides
jcpham: i can't see how it can be a loss
mircea_popescu: pigeons if it made a reasonable decision it might have i nthe future had more important stuff brought before it.
pigeons: of course its a win, he either didnt have to pay, or else his rota gets promted and he pays what he owed
mircea_popescu: hard enough to push the concept as it is, even if we were to believe judges are marginally qualified and someqwhat sane
mircea_popescu: if we don't believe either of those it's a dead sell, no matter how hard i push it
dub: if the guy had been forced to use the rota and lost, incurring further cost it would be even more of a joke
pigeons: well it won't be very useful if its only used for what you bring forward to it
dub: wtf is an mpex custoemr service dispute doing in rota
mircea_popescu: what did you expect, to start by considering a five million btc case ?
pigeons: dub: actually, the reason is so he can promote his rota
dub: pigeons: then your decision is double wrong
mircea_popescu: no. the reason is so that you people can show you can judge.
jcpham: the only thing i can possibly imagine that we did wrong was split the fees incorrectly
jcpham: no one will convince me otherwise
dub: pigeons: 1) because the policy 'wences' agreed to by using mpex is clear and you ruled against that. 2) mpex would have looked a lot worse having forced the use of rota then winning
mircea_popescu: jcpham that's pretty much it. you allocated the cost of fucking up to the party that didn't fuck up.
pigeons: could not make someone pay to get justice
dub: I think you caused this by using the rota for something so trivial tbh
pigeons: i am very upset this was a rota case
dub: next rota case, should I have cornflakes or museli for breakfast
dub: so does mircea_popescu get neg rated?
dub: that is what the whole thing is about right? judges donate their reputation to uphold the reputation of others
pigeons: dub: he does if he fails to make good on the judgement
jcpham: a tx fee and a lot less time could have resolved this
pigeons: something small like customer service?
dub: mircea_popescu: nah, its a dumb thing for the rota
mircea_popescu: you're not part of the scotus, just yet. so, you know, little room to thumb nose.
dub: look at the notes in the comments, you are agreeing to reimburse him
dub: so he got his money back, good result?
jcpham: there is an idea that the fees represent
dub: why is the rulling against you a problem if thats what the rota is for, processing your customer service enquiries
mircea_popescu: dub because now any of the judges can start spamming my address with 100 btc payments
jcpham: apparently we shit on that idea
pigeons: it shows that if you expect service from mircea_popescu you better pay to sue him and win
dub: so you wanted to win, then pay him back?
jcpham: 1) if the claimant paid the funds
jcpham: 2) if the claimant can prove ownership of said funds
pigeons: mp paid 9 btc to get his rota promoted and scare people into being more careful depositing because of raised awareness of the hassle of errors
dub: mircea_popescu: you appear to agree to return the funds or are at least satisfied with his signing of the message, if you had won the case would have looked even more retarded
mircea_popescu: pigeons what happens now if you send 100.0 btc, sue, get back 100 + 10 fee + 3 for judging it ?
pigeons: i dont know mircea_popescu that isnt clear to me
pigeons: where does the 3 come from
pigeons: we thought it came from the looser's 10
mircea_popescu: two parties to any trial. each contributes 10 btc, for a total of 20.
dub: either mpex policy is 'you fuckup the deposit you lose it, no question' or 'don't fuckup but we may be able to fix it'
jcpham: as i understand it: each case will have at least 20 btc in fess paid
mircea_popescu: 3 judges to any trial, each gets 3 btc, for a total of 9.
pigeons: ok, winner gets his 10 back then that leaves 1
jcpham: 3 judges at 3btc apiece leaves 11BTC to split in every case
mircea_popescu: the winner gets a fraction of 10 btc = to the % he's allocated.
pigeons: i would have charged you more than 140 if i could have
pigeons: 130 + 10 fees you caused him to incur
mircea_popescu: you know, money isn't soemthing to be redistributed to the needy. or do you ?
jcpham: in my mind it takes little to no effort to refund someone
jcpham: how much effort is actually required
pigeons: he isnt needy, its his money
mircea_popescu: pigeons what happens now if you send 100.0 btc, sue, get back 100 + 10 fee + 3 for judging it ? <<< this.
jcpham: i know 4 other people who can do the same
dub: mircea_popescu: you should have thought about it before using a court to settle stupid shit
pigeons: you owed him 130, the fees were to be allocated, since you caused the fees, you pay them not him
dub: he got the same amount back that he spent, you lost the case, you incur charges
mircea_popescu: pigeons i didn't "cause" him to send rounded numbers dood.
pigeons: no way you get anything of the fees when you could have settled it without rota
pigeons: you didnt cause it, it is reasonable that you credit him
mircea_popescu: yeah, well, i guess this shows why the random person, even if well meaning, can not be a judge.
pigeons: you did cause the rounded anyway, by your retarted one address deposit system
jcpham: you guys should make bets on rota disputes from now
jcpham: maybe you can clean up
mircea_popescu: the fact that all btc goes to the same address means nobody's deposits or withdrawals can be traced.
mod6: (12:18) < pigeons> you did cause the rounded anyway, by your retarted one address deposit system << this is amazing
mod6: are you guys IT people?
mod6: what do you guys do for a living?
dub: at first glance this seems open and shut, he failed to utilise mpex per teh conditions he agreed to, he loses
pigeons: it wasnt a case against the breach of conditions
dub: but in the 'case notes' there is some arbitaration and an inferred agreement to refund, so a win for the claimant is the intuitive result
pigeons: it was breach of fiduciary duty, which he did breach cause he failed to take a reasonable action
pigeons: i asked prior about that inferred agreement and mp said it wasnt what it appeared to us
pigeons: but yeah sure looks like one to me too
jcpham: still need rassah's ruling
pigeons: wow the fact that you actually expected to win is shocking
mod6: its not about who won the case. its about the damn ruling.
mod6: jesus fucking christ.
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 4817 @ 0.00061302 = 2.9529 BTC [+]
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 12783 @ 0.00061358 = 7.8434 BTC [+]
mod6: i feel like im taking crazy pills
pigeons: why didnt you just pay him instead of making us go through this if you expected him to win?
pigeons: why would the system award you anything for acting in bad faith
mircea_popescu: pigeons so that you may prove yourselves as actually takeable seriously as judges
Namworld: So... can I use the rota for the unclaimed giga.etf case? =P
pigeons: well maybe we showed that, if we shilled we sure wouldnt have and you sure wouldnt have gotten any cases
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 1608 @ 0.00061358 = 0.9866 BTC [+]
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 3325 @ 0.00061374 = 2.0407 BTC [+]
pigeons: well cause you think its an error doesnt make it so
pigeons: you lost, you caused the process by not settling beforehand, so you pay the fees
pigeons: dont they still have to win?
dub: its easy for you to fix though, just make the rule hard and fast, no refunds
dub: its in the ToS, deal with it
jurov: mircea i don't understand one thing. why you can't just set a hefty fee for resolving mistakes?
pigeons: it was a rule, but mp told him to go to rota
dub: I think the rota did mpex a favour ruling this way
jurov: oh, so better take everything. i see.
pigeons: its not fair, guy had to go through all this just to get his shit back
mircea_popescu: dude i dunno, seriously, mail your house keys to some random address
mircea_popescu: for the tiome you couldn't go inside cause you didn't have your keys or w/e
pigeons: its the argument he gave to the deposit command
mircea_popescu: why hasn't this lively debate take place in teh comment section ?!
jurov: mircea, so if i mail the keys, they get to keep the house? is it what you're saying?
pigeons: cause no one wants to email you to get credits to read a web page
pigeons: nope i can only see this one page
mircea_popescu: dude... comments are always and in all circumstancess visible.
jcpham: i think if you want to preserve this in posterity for all to comment on, it needs to be moved elsewhere
jcpham: it's very personal right now
dub: lets all agree it was a fuckup and forget about it
pigeons: nope we all think we are right
dub: maybe there will be a real case for the rota one day but it now seems unlikely
jcpham: hopefully the next judges will nt be so biased
mircea_popescu: i doubt it has any relevance to anyone other than the ppl involved tho
jurov: <jurov> mircea, so if i mismail the keys, they get to keep the house? is it what you're saying?
mircea_popescu: i think for everyone else its "o, that thing that couldn't have worked didn't ? o wow."
dub: mircea_popescu - the first person to create his own justice system, and the first to destroy his own justice system
jurov: ^ can you at least reply to this?
mircea_popescu: jurov no, you may ask for the keys back, and even get them
jcpham: metaphorically, wences got back his own keys plus a nother set of keys to another house?
jurov: but in this case it's like they told me they're moving into the house, it's reasonable
mircea_popescu: this is literally "he should get the keys, the stamps for having asked and if we could we'd have given him all paid tow weeks vacation to boot"
dub: courts award costs to the winner, fyi
dub: the idea is teh winner goes away without having lost money
pigeons: markedathome: he paid 140 130 +10 fees
dub: markedathome: he paid a 10btc fee to use the rota
jcpham: the only other option i would've entertained was for both parties to lose
dub: to an outsider reading that blog post it actually look slike the rota worked fine
pigeons: should all be done in irc and log posted
dub: aside from mircea_popescu taxing himself 10btc to handly a customer service case
dub: then, he might have paid someone 10 btc to handle it
mircea_popescu: dub it reads like mp taxing himself to create the system, and paying people to be idiots and subvert deposit process.
dub: 10btc is pretty cheap for 3 judges
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 8100 @ 0.00061132 = 4.9517 BTC [-]
dub: even internet judges
dub: mircea_popescu: you eveil, evil state you
markedathome: what would the difference have been with something like judge.me?
mircea_popescu: basically this is a ruling saying "it is right and proper for people to disregard instructions and send anything they want to mpex"
jcpham: i do not agree with that
pigeons: no but it happens, especially with the weird deposit system
jcpham: i see your point, but based on the details of this case
pigeons: and when it does happen, and you've shown mpex that you made it error, they dont fix it, hence the rota decision
jurov: no. it is ruling saying "it is improper for mpex to keep everything if user makes a mistake"
jcpham: especially if the user sends the correct deposit
pigeons: mistakes dont happen mircea_popescu ?
markedathome: mircea_popescu: maybe offer, 1) anonymous deposit - lose at risk even with signed / authenticated ownership
mircea_popescu: not by those who we identify as "the man" in our misguided quest for social justice.
pigeons: mircea_popescu: actually, it was reasonable in this case to resolve his mistake, that was the ruling
dub: no, its a ruling saying 'if you are going to enter into arbitration regarding incorrect depost amounts, do that privately'
mircea_popescu: if that actually is the case, i should certainly dissolve it.
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 7325 @ 0.00061374 = 4.4956 BTC [+]
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 8844 @ 0.00061495 = 5.4386 BTC [+]
dub: in a real court if you forced a case to be raised, then during the hearing capitualted to the other party, the court would probably impose an additional fine on you for wasting its time
mircea_popescu: no but wtf bs is this, "We are too good for the case at hand"
mircea_popescu: dub the idea here is to create a new system, not to rehash the old.
pigeons: dub: that is exactly how i felt
mircea_popescu: the entire point is to have voluntary courts, which is to say, courts which can be relied on to be fair. by both parties.
dub: well then the rota wasn't what I and apparently others thought
jcpham: fairness is a relative term
pigeons: it was fair to both parties, wences was made whole, mp lost nothing other than the fees
mircea_popescu: jcpham in no interpretation of fairness can you promote a judgement based on one single party's pov.
dub: I understand how mircea_popescu feels though
pigeons: mircea_popescu: that's absolutely the issue
dub: I took a guy to court for selling me a boat that leaked, the ruled in his favour because we didnt have anything about it not leaking in a contract
pigeons: any judgement involving mircea_popescu keeping something would have had to show he was being reasonable, and he wasn't
jcpham: i'd like to know where the original wording is.....
jurov: if i'd have a policy saying to clients "if you make a mistake, screw you" and there's no real reason why it has to be so, it's only reasonable the court would say "screw your policy"
jcpham: the orginal wording were it says mpex keeps funds mistakenly sent or incorrect in size
mircea_popescu: jurov no, it's not. the court isn't above the contract
mircea_popescu: again, this isn't fiat world and socialist government imposing it.
jcpham: i know it is somewhere
jcpham: because i remember readin it
mircea_popescu: DEPOSIT|{sum}, where the sum is an integer, written in BTC (note that you can not deposit less than 10 BTC). You will be quoted an exact sum, which you must send to the exchange address (1Fx3N5iFPDQxUKhhmDJqCMmi3U8Y7gSncx). Don't round anything, the decimals are there to identify you as the beneficiary. You will be credited the full amount.
pigeons: i thought about giving it to mp since he does say he keeps errors, but in law that wont hold up, thats not reasonable
jurov: the court isn't above the contract... who decided, you?
jurov: rota just decided else
pigeons: even if a contract spells that and this happened a court rules this way
jcpham: yes but i thought there was wording that said something along the lines of "if it is wrong, you do not get it back"
jcpham: which is a customer service nightmare
jcpham: if you relegate me to customer service, I'm going to serve your customers
mircea_popescu: turns out this banal case was actually incredibly fucking intricate huh.
jcpham: i wouldn't think so either
jcpham: i think everyone had the best intentions
mircea_popescu: but i squarely don't see how anyone would ever consider responding to a case, ever.
mircea_popescu: i mean, why ? run the risk of purely unilateral sidetaking... to what avail ? makes no sense.
jcpham: the next case may be unilateral against the claimant
pigeons: yeah you always run the risk of unilateral sidetaking
jcpham: the fees are the only way you have been harmed
pigeons: this was just clearcut mircea_popescu you owed him the money, he won, loser pays fees
jcpham: it seems the real precedent is the loser pays the fees
jcpham: but i don't like the winner/loser description
jcpham: it wasn't necessary to frame this case this way imho
pigeons: if another case it works out differently fine, that doesnt have to be a precedent, but in this case the fees were clearly incurred by mircea_popescu being unwilling to work out the issue despite having the facts beforehand
mircea_popescu: pigeons except the loser is the party that made no mistake.
jcpham: the implication is that the "mistake" was not returning the funds
jcpham: as quickly as possible
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 12600 @ 0.00061495 = 7.7484 BTC [+]
jcpham: if the guy hadn't send the correct amount
jcpham: i can see him not getting his money back
pigeons: its pretty well established in law actually that you don't pay for mistakes
mircea_popescu: the court can't substitute its own moral judgements for the contract between the parties.
pigeons: he fulfilled his contract, sent the money, but he made a mistake
pigeons: you had the obligation to fix that for him
pigeons: well then how come you lost?
jcpham: i would seem that due to the lack of rules, the rota can make all sorts of WILDLY INACCURATE decisions
mircea_popescu: reading the above, i now regred i didn't more clearly stress the supremacy of contract point
mircea_popescu: i can clearly see in retrospect how this "obvious" point was only obvious to me.
pigeons: no but even a written contract saying that mistakes in deposits are kept would have resulted the same
pigeons: because the intent of the contract is obviously what's material
jcpham: i'm still looking for the actual wording on MPEX (now)
jcpham: where it says incorrect deposits are kept
jcpham: because this fact was discussed
pigeons: i knew this was policy, but in this particular case, it was reasonable that mircea_popescu credit the amount showed to have been sent
mircea_popescu: what's unreasonable tho, is to expect me to pay the costs of doing so.
markedathome: the /faq.html entry for DEPOSIT{sum} I thought would have had the same text as that of the command (in fact all of the commands should)
pigeons: which costs, your time was unavoidable here, but you didnt have to pay the fees if you settled before rota
jcpham: to be even more specific mircea_popescu
jcpham: I thought you had specifcs, like
jcpham: there was a sentence saying you didn't return deposits that were wrong
mircea_popescu: pigeons why would i "settle before the rota" ? what bs is that?
pigeons: because you had all the info we had
pigeons: why should this have gone to rota?
jcpham: i would like to re-read it if it still there
pigeons: only reason (other than bad faith wanting to promote rota) would be you didnt want to pay
mircea_popescu: Before sending the sum quoted you have to send an email containing at the very least the address you want benefits (through either the later exercise or sale of your contracts) forwarded to and the sum quoted to you. This allows you to be identified. If you fail to do this it may be impossible to ever identify you as the owner of the respective contracts/bitcoins, and so they may be forever lost.
pigeons: it shouldnt have gone to rota because he made it clear to you he paid the money
jcpham: i suggest a new irc channel for this discussion should it arise again
jcpham: possibly a new forum format
pigeons: im not doing a forum, but an irc channel agreed
jcpham: other than mircea_popescu's blog
pigeons: i cant read his blog it asks for a fee
jcpham: i'm dependant on google translate
jcpham: sorry i didn't know you switched
jcpham: but the case is in english
markedathome: rota peeps - faq q24, whilst not strictly mentioning deposits, isn't this also relevant?
mircea_popescu: 23. What will you do about stolen coins ? How will you help the rightful owner ?
mircea_popescu: By defition the rightful owner of any coins is "he who can send them". If you take issue with that, please stick to fiat. You are not ready for Bitcoin yet.
jcpham: my bad for not disabling google translate
mircea_popescu: thios was proofed like 8 times. STILL SPELLING ERRORS IN IT OMG
jcpham: Q23 was addressed markedathome
jcpham: it was never at question who the present owner of the 130 btc was
jcpham: the question was past ownership and fiduciary responsibility
jcpham: throwing the term "fiduciary responsibility" changes things
markedathome: I thought it was with two deposits of 130btc and only one order, along with not being able to sign with the originating key.
assbot: [MPEX:S.MPOE] 1D: 0.0005984 / 0.000611 / 0.0006312 (1755603 shares, 1,072.68 BTC), 7D: 0.0005984 / 0.00065107 / 0.00068 (8687621 shares, 5,656.34 BTC), 30D: 0.0005984 / 0.00064545 / 0.00068 (38661110 shares, 24,953.83 BTC)
jcpham: we had him sign from blockchain
mircea_popescu: DEPOSIT|{sum}, where the sum is an integer, written in BTC (note that you can not deposit less than 10 BTC). You will be quoted an exact sum, which you must send to the exchange address (1Fx3N5iFPDQxUKhhmDJqCMmi3U8Y7gSncx). Don't round anything, the decimals are there to identify you as the beneficiary. You will be credited the full amount. Incoming Bitcoin that doesn't exactly match a quoted sum will be simply kept, r
mircea_popescu: eported as profits and distributed to MPEx shareholders.
jcpham: and it has now been re-added
jcpham: i have the type of memory where i read things and usually cannot forget them
jcpham: that sentence was there at one point in time
jcpham: a similarly worded sentence
jcpham: it would've been the first incarnation of any site you debuted
jcpham: because i read it then
markedathome: jcpham: the q5 syntax deposit doesn't have that addition, the output of the command did.
jcpham: i think if you go out of your way to make that sentence known
jcpham: not to me, not searchable in the faq to the public
jcpham: i was peronally aware of the idea of it, yes
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 134 @ 0.00061495 = 0.0824 BTC [+]
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 26149 @ 0.00061508 = 16.0837 BTC [+]
mircea_popescu: Jan 05 22:13:53 <mircea_popescu> BUT! FOR SRS! I AM KEEPING ROUNDED SUMS! NOOBS BEWARE!
markedathome: doesn't have mpex deposit so would be difficult to find?
jcpham: oh my bad for missing that sentence on January 5th at 10pm
markedathome: I think that it does show that the rota needs to have area of jusrisdiction and contracts specifically stated, either in the case, the rota site/faq and in nominating the selection of the judges
mircea_popescu: yeah but a large part of the appeal was the philosophical purity of its general open nature
mircea_popescu: once you start trying to prop things with fiat-type arches you'll collapse in fiat mess.
markedathome: then isn't that the jurisdiction, and should be used as the basis? and if so which if any of the ruling matched?
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 14300 @ 0.00061132 = 8.7419 BTC [-]
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 450 @ 0.00061109 = 0.275 BTC [-]
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [SDICE] 2 @ 0.5231 = 1.0462 BTC [-]
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 17313 @ 0.00061508 = 10.6489 BTC [+]
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [SDICE] 3 @ 0.52 = 1.56 BTC [-]
dub: mircea_popescu: just because it didn't go your way doesn't mean that didnt happen
dub: philosophical purity
mircea_popescu: well obviously a one case of anything is about as meaningless as any other one case of something else
mircea_popescu: for that matter, expectign people to be thrown in a pond supposed to be above and beyond the collected wisdom of a good third of all humans that ever lived is also a bit off.
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 6038 @ 0.00061508 = 3.7139 BTC [+]
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 10962 @ 0.00061536 = 6.7456 BTC [+]
dub: again because the 'wisdom' does not suit you, its not invalid
dub: the judges ruled that their time was wasted with triviality
dub: sure it is, they do in 'fiat' courts every day
dub: in fact, judges do whatever it is they feel like, by exposing your internal process to a court of judges you accepted that
mircea_popescu: ahaha! wait, wait. these verdicts, they fail to include payment addresses.
mircea_popescu: jcpham someone will sooner or later have to lift the messy rock of btc courts.
mircea_popescu: it's going to be messy, and it's going to be a waste of everyone's time.
Namworld: So, can I use the rota for GIGA.ETF...
Namworld: I don't know. Who's in the rota? How do I start anything?
Namworld: I'll try and find the link I guess
mircea_popescu: normally i would have loved to say yes, but under the circumstances i don't see myself signing.
mircea_popescu: bullshit "claimant is always right and mp is annoying and rich" judgements i don't need a court for, they're a dime a dozen.
jcpham: the judgement wasn't bullshit
jcpham: it makes you look like a fucking angel
mircea_popescu: hey, you judge the case, i judge your judgement. seems logical neh ?
mircea_popescu: that's the first roll. iirc there's a link to the very short contitution in it
jcpham: the link is in there to the proposal
jcpham: still like that word with the a-
pigeons: wow great contract on that one
jcpham: you know i had too google the correct spelling of it
jcpham: when i intentiaonally mispelled it
mircea_popescu: If any votes are held on the underlieing asset then (if practical) a motion will
jcpham: fwiw i have 0 business relationship with any asset or exchange
jcpham: or any other rota member
pigeons: except i pay you to clean my house topless
jurov: lol i realized i can't enter rota even if i wanted
jurov: i'd rule "let mircea screw them, so they prefer coinbr"
jcpham: i cannot benefit from any of this
jcpham: in any way that i'm aware of
dub: you can benefit of the peoples love
jcpham: can i do the queen victoria wave
jcpham: all my assets defuncted themselves
dub: all judges should submit photo wearing silly wig
assbot: [BTCTC] [BTC-BOND] 1 @ 0.01 BTC [+]
dub: and optionally, gavel in pooper
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 118 @ 0.00061536 = 0.0726 BTC [+]
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 5382 @ 0.00061577 = 3.3141 BTC [+]