log☇︎
983300+ entries in 0.728s
mircea_popescu: you ever been to europe ?
midnightmagic: mod6: Notice they sell ice cream by volume. Which really cheeses me off. But the denser it is, the more cream:air ratio it has.
midnightmagic: mod6: And no, I refuse to buy whipped-air ice cream. It's inferior quality.
midnightmagic: mod6: that comes next.
midnightmagic: ah, usually that's publically-funded though.
mircea_popescu: it's what research actually is, for that matter.
mircea_popescu: sure it can. research that's not justified economically happens all the time
midnightmagic: yeah i don't understand that. there's a simple metric to finding the best ice cream in a store..
midnightmagic: the funding for the research can't happen if selling bitcoin rewards doesn't support it though..
midnightmagic: "securing itself" includes disincentivizing b-s like the DDoS that sdice is. :-)
midnightmagic: It's cannibalizing some of its own worth in order to secure itself.
midnightmagic: The value of mining is a finite value and can't exceed some fraction of the value of the bitcoin economy..
midnightmagic: Ah, that's not consensus.
midnightmagic: good lord no. ASIC producers are internally parasitic. The value derives from a parasitic self-consumption of economic worth.
mircea_popescu: completely blindsides market, it's hysterical to watch reactions etc.
mircea_popescu: and makes more revenue to boot.
mircea_popescu: out of nowhere comes this dood, and suddenly his corp is larger than all the asic producers together
mircea_popescu: he's amusing to me because looky here : the consensus was that mining corps are the big deal.
midnightmagic: man fuck that guy.. lol
mircea_popescu: apparently they're E Vor Hee's
midnightmagic: lol hilarious analogy. But! Are they Tim Horton's doughnuts, or Krispy Kremes?
mircea_popescu: "not including" the filling in the donut is pracrtically speaking not including yourself among the donut makers.
mircea_popescu: i know you like bitcoin in principle. but in practical terms, it's useless other than because its that thing where sdice happens.
mircea_popescu: you'll at some point have to come to terms with the cold reality that about half of bitcoin's utility atm is s.dice
midnightmagic: they're still securing the blockchain.
midnightmagic: that's not true. even miners who do *no* txn in their blocks are still burying txn in work.
mircea_popescu: the incentive really is against including miners who don't ihnclude transactions into bitcoin.
mircea_popescu: yeah, i guess time will tell.
midnightmagic: let other people who don't care, mine sdice txn, and take the hit to block propagation. the incentive is against including sdice txn in the blockchain.
mircea_popescu: contrary to what the people who think they know better think, their fall into oblivion will be immediate.
mircea_popescu: i guess at some point the split between the people who matter and the people who think they know better is inevitable
mod6: *whew* almost forgot that mtdew in the freezer
midnightmagic: the exact standard has fees, and the code has anti-dust-spam exceptions in it. satoshi foresaw operations like sdice.
mircea_popescu: but you're welcome to establish it through experience if simple theory doesn't cut it for ya.
mircea_popescu: hey, it's the exact standard
midnightmagic: that's not true. :)
mircea_popescu: miners stick with this or get lost.
mircea_popescu: other than the issuer of the tx.
mircea_popescu: nobody's to evaluate the value of keeping a tx in the blockchain
midnightmagic: that is part of the whole nature of bitcoin.
midnightmagic: and miners are the ones who set fee structures.
midnightmagic: mircea_popescu: the value of keeping sdice txn in the blockchain is less than the value of keeping diffuse txn in the blockchain, including mixnets btw.
mircea_popescu: this is just posturing on the strength of the block reward being still large-ish
midnightmagic: it can. but there isn't enough incentive due to concentration of txn value. also, rg isn't really much of an authority :)
midnightmagic: but sdice operates inside the txn space, which makes it easy to filter. If they operated the way everyone else normal does, and stopped doing those stupid micro-txn, then meh.
mircea_popescu: who do you think wants to ask miners' permission ?
mod6: but... that doesn't mean there couldn't be a better way to do it either.
mircea_popescu: the moment bitcoin is not transaction agnostic it might as well be dead.
mod6: its kinda like rg said once, if bitcoin can't handle the tx's from SD, then we should pack up and shut off the lights now.
mircea_popescu: im not too concerned about miners deciding to ruin bitcoin.
midnightmagic: Redistribution of hashrate, in some cases to people who care what happens with the blockchain.
midnightmagic: We'll see what happens to sdice when asic are delivered.. :-)
midnightmagic: Woops, "begging the question" doesn't mean "raising the question".
mircea_popescu: http://trilema.com/2013/the-question-of-the-year-in-btc/ ok try that then
midnightmagic: different times man
midnightmagic: And then my dad started telling me stories of grandpa.. :)
mircea_popescu: but i know i resented at that age the implication of equality in this method
midnightmagic: I was wide-eyed shocked when I saw that.
midnightmagic: right. black eyes heal. Put the boxing gloves on and get your differences out in the open. Did you ever see the Mickey Mouse club episodes where they put two fighting boys in the ring together and let them duke it out?
midnightmagic: Sure. People were admired for their fists.
mircea_popescu: but going around punching people is not too classy now is it.
midnightmagic: no way. Not much earlier than my grandfather's era, ignoring someone who said hello to you was a punch-out-able offence.
mircea_popescu: nobody punched anybody over class lol. at most they furrowed their brows and whined privately.
midnightmagic: people used to punch out other people for being classless. manners made it around pretty good.
midnightmagic: ^^ that
mircea_popescu: im sure canada is just as classless as the rest of the world, that's what we have the internet for
mircea_popescu: for about two hours once, off nh
midnightmagic: Ever been to Canada?
mircea_popescu: you live in the colonies. what class ?
mircea_popescu: one of them took off her underwear in public once
midnightmagic: I don't remember them so much..
midnightmagic: Were they all racy too?
mod6: Well, does anyone remember the bush daughters? LOL
midnightmagic: And in the sense that the leader of some political party has raised a family to be essentially unfettered, dress-wise.
midnightmagic: Yeah, in that sense it was f'ing awesome.
midnightmagic: Meanwhile, it was like none of the rest of her family noticed that they were making everyone uncomfortable.
mircea_popescu: her audience is simply the world. she's not old enough to know y'all aren't worth the trouble yet.
midnightmagic: If she was, then.. why? Who's her audience? A bunch of stuffy people at a calm atmosphere restaurant where people are coming in from the cold (it was damn cold) and eating soup in their flannels?
mircea_popescu: you actually care tghat you're sitting where some other chick sat ?!
mod6: people are just attention whores these das.
midnightmagic: It either meant she was conscious of her dress choice, or not. If she wasn't, then it was uncomfortable watching her accidentally and apparently unconciously bare her ass seven or eight times.
mod6: haha, wow. i probably wouldt have given it a second thought. i must be a savage.
mircea_popescu: she's a teen! she's supposed to go around barebutt
midnightmagic: Also it was classless for the grand-daughter of the leader of one of the main political parties in Canada to dress like that.
midnightmagic: Bare asses of unknown other people mean bare asses are sitting on the seats I sit in. It reminded me of how unhygienic being out for dinner is and I like to suspend my disbelief for a little while.
mircea_popescu: sure. you can't eat with women you've seen the ass of ?
midnightmagic: I saw her grand-daughters bare ass at a dinner once. she was wearing a mini-skirt and kept hugging people taller than she is.
mircea_popescu: now i have to look up who that is
midnightmagic: mod6: Apparently some of us do like to vote for a loser. Elizabeth May is in office. :)
mircea_popescu: it's not rational, it's quite the opposite. but it has a historical record of conservation success.
midnightmagic: Here, each vote *used* to deliver some small amount of federal funding to the party voted for as a way of fostering independent third parties.
mod6: people usually vote their wallets, and additionally always pick the precived winner before hand. voters don't like to vote for a loser, even if that candidate is more closely aligned with their political philosiphies.
mircea_popescu: voting is just a cheap method of statistically obtaining a call from the multitude.
midnightmagic: now there's a true f'ing statement if i ever heard one.
mircea_popescu: for that matter, women don't pick men rationally either.
midnightmagic: It has in the past. Additionally, at least some people are voting with their ideals because Elizabeth May made it in.
mircea_popescu: voters never are and never were capable of rational decision. that's not how voting works.
midnightmagic: I no longer have confidence, since making that statement, that my fellow voters are capable of a rational voting decision.
midnightmagic: Meanwhile, their own f*cking MPs are DM'ing people like myself and mocking us because we said they were going to be toast in the next election.
mircea_popescu: lol i was waiting for this