976000+ entries in 0.615s
jcpham: wrt makes sense. running cgminer on wrt has been avaialbe for a long
time
jcpham: i didn't believe it
though
jcpham: i've heard
that from
the beginning
dub: so
they are stand alone? no host machine required?
jcpham: it looks like
the avlon unit comes pre-flashes with openwrt
jborkl: For 1 million I can make you a picture with words in it
too
smickles: Diablo-D3: you can, but no one will sell it
to you
Diablo-D3: mircea_popescu: in
the US, you cannot own property
mircea_popescu: i guess
this is why Diablo-D3 doesn't have a propertah
dub: its
the ~american dream
Diablo-D3: fucking druggies, just kill
them all
dub: tearing up your vinyard in
the process if you want
to be a cunt about it
Diablo-D3: and you would be shot for
trespassing
dub: Diablo-D3:
then I would show up on your property with
the police and a lot of earthworking equipment
to restore
the damage
Diablo-D3: and
then shoot anyone who
trespasses on my property
dub: some are little more
than a 1m wide
trench but worth untold millions in
the wine prudction
they enable
Diablo-D3: dub: so I'd destroy
them if
they were on my property
dub: the races start in snow melts and run accross many properties but are owned by
the property
they
terminate on, and
that owner has
the right
to do any kind of remedial works onthe other properties
to ensure
the supply
smickles: hmm, i wonder what I was
thinking of
then
smickles: dub: are you sure
they don't just have
the right
to
the land, and if
the river moves off
the land,
that's why
they lost it
Schadenfreude: ah, I
thought it's a safety feature, not a feat of laziness
Diablo-D3: its not as clever as you
think it is
Schadenfreude: Coinbr checks withdrawal requests manually before accepting
them, me likey
dub: you have people diverting whole rivers, wasting
the water because if
they don't
take it
they'll lose
the rights
they bought off indians
dub: I
thought water rights were a huge deal in some states
Diablo-D3: DeadWeasel: yes, and
those
terrorist nations should be ended
DeadWeasel: water rights exist.
There are places where it's illegal
to collect rainwater
Diablo-D3: you cant own something
that doesnt exist,
they put you in
the insane asylum for
talk like
that
Diablo-D3: then
the rich shouldnt be able
to have
them either
smickles: < Diablo-D3> is start buying water and air rights << iirc, in 'merica
those don't
technically exist
jcpham: air and water futures will one day rule
the markets
mircea_popescu: and if i run off i benefit bitcoin
through decreased coin supply ?
burnside: mp,
the bold volume bit looks good.
thx for
that.
mircea_popescu: wait. so if i keep going i benefit bitcoin
through developing finance + paying mpoe-pr
to aggravate forum people
gribble: Rating entry successful. Your rating for user mircea_popescu has changed from 3
to 4.
smickles: ;;rate mircea_popescu 4 runs MPEx. If he scams us, it's probably a good
time
to shot bitcoin.
jurov: infrastructure is
there. waiting for people
mircea_popescu: i'd wager you can implement almost all currently used wall street contract
types
mircea_popescu: mpex actually has all
the infrastructure in place, with
the signed pushes
jurov: quite an idea. i can perhaps plunder smickles' short offering
to cover IDIFFs
mircea_popescu: im sure someone would be willing
to issue short
term loans against mpex assets.
jurov: same as you computed
the mkt cap: qty*price :D
mircea_popescu: seems more logical
to either sell
the stock or else pledge it as collateral/repo it with someone who specializes in
this
mircea_popescu: the complexities of automated actuarial calculation
tho...
jurov: okay. but really, couldn't be
the futures covered by S.MPOE for example?
mircea_popescu: jurov you know
this reminds me of
that joke, someone asks henry miller what sort of writing pays
the best
Namworld: relaxing on a chair on a
tropical island
Namworld: pirate paid for some rum
to
the waiter.
jurov: i can
try ask if
they'll pay me for
that :p
jurov: perhaps someone can write article
to btcmag with all
the scenarios ELI5
mircea_popescu: but
then again i guess miners aren't (yet)
too sophisticated, financially.
mircea_popescu: i'd go as far as
to say it's financially irresponsible for any large-ish mining operation
to not hedge diff
jurov: ic. ust
that someone has
to offer
them
mircea_popescu: if you have a lot of btc it makes sense
to sell some, maybe
Bugpowder: I was
thinking of covering my short 20 MARs
jurov: whether i do or not,
the collateral requirement causes it
to be unattractive. compared
to what else can be done with
the cash
mircea_popescu: if you actually have a mining farm active you can calculate both
the volume and
the price at which you should be buying
to make a profit.
jurov: yes, just
that
trying anything beyond MAR is is just insane
mircea_popescu: they should be pretty straightforward, i have no idea why people don't use
them a lot more.
jurov: i'm
tryting
to do something w/them
mircea_popescu: judging by
the recent experience of
the gem
thingee, btc market is a lot more mature.
burnside: well, one of
the key
things I don't want are
the ponzi kind of
things
to
take off, so
tot volume on
those just ends up being a promotion...
burnside: that's a good point. I had it in
there before I had 30d available, kind of as a sign of "seniority".
mircea_popescu: and
tot volume is glbse bullshit. either 30 day or 1 year
burnside: I'm not sure what
to do with it. I
tried <sub> and <sup> variations, etc.
burnside: yeah, one of
the reasons I don't like it much.
mircea_popescu: also a point : () is
traditionally notation for negative figures
burnside: I still don't like it much, but it's better
than it was
burnside: yeah,
that was some good input from you guys
mircea_popescu: i'll
tell you something
tho, it's good
that you changed
the way 7day etc volume is presented
burnside: I know he understands it under
the hood, he coded
the same stuff.
burnside: seems like it. he has an account on
the system, it's easy
to see how it works.
Bugpowder: and blasts away
the shares you
thought you were buying
Bugpowder: dangerous in fast moving environment
though
topace: so
the webserver just forwards
the request on
mircea_popescu: <topace> it'd be nice if
the BUY response provided
the order id <<
the webserver does not know what ids
the orders will end up with.
Bugpowder: I have locked myself out of my account like
that before.
topace: mircea_popescu: ahh, k, see, i new
there was a problem :p