log☇︎
971700+ entries in 0.658s
truffles: seems ppl arent happy about random tranche announcements
gesell: after some thought, on the whole s.dice share thing... maybe it's a good thing that people are forced to think in terms of long term investment (mostly for dividends) rather than traditional stocks. i;d be happy if you would under sell every time. at the moment bitcoin stocks are still, well, they shouldnt be assumed the same
ThickAsTh: isnt there like 800k depsoited to MPEX waiting?
ThickAsTh: theyre already sold in theory
evoorhees: I'll post ahead of time for any other tranches
evoorhees: we'll see how things go with .0055
grubles: DeaDTerra: he wants to personally rub your bitcoins between his fingers to check if they are counterfeit or not
evoorhees: usually used when talking about financial assets
truffles: so there can be infinite batches?
evoorhees: a tranche is like a "batch" of something
ThickAsTh: They won't sell at that price
ThickAsTh: i dunno, it's the word everyone is using for releasing a batch of shares
truffles: whats a tranche?
ThickAsTh: and the market will be down after these two also
ThickAsTh: So if you jumped from .0044 to .0055, where does that leave the next 3 tranches? kinda hard to go too much further up
truffles: yea do include the edge in that in vid
truffles: it took forever to process now my bitcoin software is still processing wth!
jcpham: i'm weird with technology
evoorhees: except that you break it every day deadterra :)
evoorhees: jcpham - if you can make a good SD vid for youtube I'll be happy to send you some coins
truffles: no its terrible
evoorhees: truffles you don't like the SD site?
jcpham: evoorhees i'm all over the youtubes
truffles: yea im still confused about how this bitcoin setup works
truffles: i cant get over how bad this site design looks..
ThickAsTh: That is one side that is missing from SDICE, easily guiding a gambler into setting up a bitcoin wallet and sending a bet
truffles: makes me think of that
truffles: http://en.boardgamearena.com/#!gamepanel?game=cantstop this game is fun
truffles: im not a good candidate for that
truffles: evoorhees is there a s.dice utube?
maximian: It's where the brand is presented, where you learn how to play - it's important
evoorhees: "The worst case scenario is they arrest you and splash one of those stupid DOJ banners on satoshidice.com" - I've taken steps to handle this
maximian: so it would be nice to know if you have a contingency plan for that
truffles: is there a utube for s.dice?
maximian: even if they can't charge you with anything, damage will be done
maximian: even though that doesn't necessarily stop betting, it'll be bad
ThickAsTh: but, either way, I think some strategic marketing would make the site really take off, when it's time
maximian: The worst case scenario is they arrest you and splash one of those stupid DOJ banners on satoshidice.com
truffles: and why is it that evoorhees holds 89%?
ThickAsTh: it bitcoins that are what they need to look at
ThickAsTh: It's funny though, because SDICE isnt really different than any video game
evoorhees: it's an awesome brand and game, and deserves to be set up properly
truffles: like an s.dice how to?
maximian: You have to assume that someone at the DOJ is or will take a good look at s.dice.
truffles: is there a website where i can learn about what this is all about?
ThickAsTh: So the plan is pretty much stasis while legal ducks get in a row
maximian: evoorhees: that's great - it's been a worry of mine
evoorhees: the plan, for now, is to get SD some good legal advice on how to proceed in the safest way possible. It is getting lots of press and free advertising, and I don't want to push it further before having all the ducks in a row
ThickAsTh: Just trying to get a sense of what's happening now to strike while the iron's hot
ThickAsTh: I recall seeing info about a print ad campaign, maybe more, but that was all before my time
ThickAsTh: Erik, if you are still around, can I ask what the current & future marketing plans are for SDICE?
jcpham: so i can sue when my name isn't in the credits
jcpham: some of these are pretty old I'm wondering why i still have them
jcpham: treasure trove of lulz
jcpham: <jcpham> yep that works
jcpham: <grubles> ill have pirate send them to you, cool?
jcpham: i was just looking through my grubles chat logs
imsaguy: pigeons: its one of those thigns that made sense at the time when a person is tied up into the story
pigeons: its too much damn hassle paying lenders out of my 10% weekly profits, let's do "trust accounts"
ThickAsTh: BTCTC takes forever to confirm deposits
jcpham: seems like i have that info in a/query log
pigeons: i think it was just time for both of them to move on, and people did get screwed and it certainly didnt have to be that way, but oh well
imsaguy: besides the shaft
imsaguy: I wanna know what grubles got out of this
jurov: they still didn't decide whether they'll list or not
pigeons: cant trust him not to break contracts, thats true
jurov: i don't mind rg at this point, worse enw owners are equally inept
pigeons: cant trust his old key
jcpham: i can't trust him
jcpham: the gpg key thing is not excusable
imsaguy: unless its in the contract
imsaguy: and you can't jus force them to sell
jcpham: to meet the mpex contract, that is
imsaguy: the old shareholders would need to be bought out.
jcpham: bitvps would need to do the same
jcpham: it seems to me that similar to what dell has just done
pigeons: but at any rate, everyone acknowledges th ownership transfer and its working out well for everyone except the investors (that leaves customers and new owners)
imsaguy: evoorhees, its just barter unless there's dollars.
pigeons: no consideration can be more than currency/dollars
jurov: cause he wanted hard to be employed, have the career and be able to fire people instead of boring task of running bitvps :DDD
imsaguy: but there isn't.
imsaguy: pigeons: technically, nothing in bitcoin is sold unless there is $1.
imsaguy: he isn't allowed to do that either.
jurov: rg just left everything to new owhers for free
imsaguy: so technically, one could argue the sale wasn't legal
imsaguy: all without even consulting the other major owner
jcpham: that's how it reads to me
imsaguy: and then did
imsaguy: he wasn't allowed to sell
evoorhees: was that on glbse?
jcpham: iana though
jcpham: the previous owner of bitvps entered into a contract and then broke it
evoorhees: oh thought you were talking about s.dice
pigeons: evoorhees: rapeghost sold more than half the shares
jcpham: iana though
jcpham: looks like the directors fucked up
pigeons: jcpham: (c) The Directors warrant that no further shares will be offered by them for a period of 30 days from the date these offered shares are sold. The Directors further warrant that they will never sell more than half the total shares.
evoorhees: pigeons - yes that's true
pigeons: oh i didnt know that. ithought all mpex stocks were non voting shares enforced by keeping 51% of the shares private
evoorhees: yes to be technically accurate, I have 39m shares of s.dice on mpex (these became available a few days ago, which was 30 days after the final sale of the ipo shares)