log☇︎
960800+ entries in 0.713s
topace_: because it can be there or not and it still validates
topace_: so i'd also have to trim off the = before the =4chr
gribble: BTCUSD ticker | Best bid: 32.14001, Best ask: 32.35299, Bid-ask spread: 0.21298, Last trade: 32.35599, 24 hour volume: 81740.26344155, 24 hour low: 30.79010, 24 hour high: 33.20000, 24 hour vwap: 31.94954
mircea_popescu: (the = char may not be part of the signature cause it's not in the base64 list)
topace_: but how can you be sure you've reached the checksum?
mircea_popescu: cause when you reach the checksum it's ended
topace_: but if there's no way of knowing how long the signature is expected to be, and it allows adding crap at the end, again, how do i know where to stop reading the characters of the 'actual' signature
mircea_popescu: within the signature block, a =j61e type string is the end (cause it's the checksum)
topace_: yea it definitely needs a blank line after the BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE line
topace_: so if there can be crap after the end, how do i know where to stop reading characters that are actually part of the signature
mircea_popescu: put it on the same line with -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
topace_: validates too
mircea_popescu: the gpg parser mostly ignores spaces/newlines/etc EXCEPT it wants a newline after the begin sig tag
topace_: so how can i reliably filter out just the signature? if there's no logical separator?
mircea_popescu: no, that's base64 filler
topace_: does the = at the end of the sig (before the checksum) designate the end of the signature?
mircea_popescu: and then a close
mircea_popescu: and then a 1 line checksum as a =4char
mircea_popescu: the structure of a gpg signed message is, there's a header (begin blabla, comment whatever), then a message, then a signature ehader, then the signature
topace_: hmm nope, i can concatenate the two lines into one and it validates.. i can combine all 3 lines onto one, and it validates too...
topace_: ahh, so I should only be considering the 2 lines of the signature hash?
mircea_popescu: if more shit is added at the end that doesn't actually matter.
mircea_popescu: if the checksum is broken it doesn't actually validate
mircea_popescu: the last line is always a =xyzk 4 characters checksum of the foregoing
mircea_popescu: none of this is actually a problem
topace_: validates too
topace_: i can actually add anything concatenated to the end
mircea_popescu: brb i gotta check this
topace_: as the last line
topace_: if i add a 1 to teh end of it, it still validates
topace_: is the signature on this receipt
topace_: and if i try to just grab the actual signature hash, that can still be changed adn still validate
mircea_popescu: but you hash the signed part not the headers
topace_: i can change that line on the receipt and it still validates
mircea_popescu: change the comment in what sig ?
topace_: i cant just hash the receipt to get a unique id because then doing something as simple as changing the comment in th e sig would change the hash and stilll validate
topace_: hey mircea_popescu you there? still working on this auto-push-receipt processing...
Eduard_Munteanu: Oh, they also report some stuff you still owe to the man.
Eduard_Munteanu: Not the end of the year, or the month or anything. Immediately.
Eduard_Munteanu: The interesting thing is stock brokers here retain the tax as soon as you sell.
Namworld: They might not but that's supposed to be declared.
Bowjob: then i dont pay taxes
Bowjob: and wont have to work for the whole year
Namworld: Probably that too.
ThickAsThieves: no way for them to know how much btc you have
Namworld: Laws & regulations vary by country/state tho
ThickAsThieves: IRS going back thru records is kinda pointless
Namworld: It's like when you have income. You pay your taxes, then let's say you buy stocks. If they raise in value, you don't pay taxes on that until you sell, at which point the price difference becomes capital gains.
Namworld: If your BTC has appreciated in value, I think you don't need to declare that value increase until you sell them. So yes. But speak to an accountant.
Bowjob: is that legit?
Bowjob: but i have enough BTC worth hundreds of thousands of dollars
Bowjob: so i wont have to pay income tas
Bowjob: i just cash in enough BTC to hit the limit of a poor person
Bowjob: mhm.. i wonder if this is allowed
aiball: Bugpowder I agree, Like Butch and Sundance didn't need to keep watch until they had the payroll
Chaang-Noi: $1000 should be in 3 years or maybe more, lots of time
Bugpowdr: If you want BTC to hit $1000, there are some things that are gonna have to happen first
Bugpowdr: unless they really are treating BTC as a foreign currency that is to be market to market at year end
Bowjob: and hunt those people
Bowjob: if BTC gets high enough, the govt might actually dig through 100 dollar buys
BitHub: we're talking about taxes here
Bugpowdr: will be the first to be examined
BitHub: they'll be the first to get slaughted
Bugpowdr: who knows, maybe they will do a good job
aiball: so, my mtgox purchase 6 months ago is on the IRS books now?
Bugpowdr: The cash for that buy was proablbly already in there
Bowjob: .. i wont ever touch coinlab with a ten foot pole
BitHub: bring wallstreet to bitcoin
Bugpowdr: then get the coins out
Bugpowdr: yes I considered that as well
Bowjob: will bring customers closer to IRS
Bowjob: could it be the buy was a panic buy
aiball: is the s.dice dividend still 14K?
Chaang-Noi: mircea_popescu i did pay that out in full
mircea_popescu: Chaang-Noi you never sold what exactly ? whatever was left after paying out for the TYGRR.BOND (100% Insured Pirate Bonds)
Bowjob: ill ride this horse wherever it takes me
kakobrekla: and if everybody does that, few years from now not a single node will be runing
Chaang-Noi: yeah, i wonder if people knew about that and they bought it all up
Bugpowdr: people understand what easier US market access will do to the price.
Bugpowdr: it was the coinlab news
mircea_popescu: Bugpowdr i really don't think it was any article.
Bugpowdr: Let's just get up to 50 so I can forget about this troubled time in my life.
Bugpowdr: The buy must have been triggered by the are technia article
gribble: BTCUSD ticker | Best bid: 32.60001, Best ask: 32.60490, Bid-ask spread: 0.00489, Last trade: 32.60490, 24 hour volume: 80058.57461354, 24 hour low: 30.79010, 24 hour high: 33.20000, 24 hour vwap: 31.92017
Bowjob: yet i jumped on the avalon bandwagon
Bowjob: i have a confession.. i actually dont know how to mine bitcoins
Bugpowdr: it hit 31.40 taking out 15,000 BTC on the way
gribble: BTCUSD ticker | Best bid: 32.45988, Best ask: 32.58915, Bid-ask spread: 0.12927, Last trade: 32.45988, 24 hour volume: 79609.88962262, 24 hour low: 30.79010, 24 hour high: 33.20000, 24 hour vwap: 31.91584
Bugpowdr: he is selling half ounces at 1.3BTC though, much cheaper than anywhere else.
kakobreklaa: and this is old.
Bugpowdr: I think we are going to 50 now
Bugpowdr: zoom in on the pic
Bugpowdr: for trades
Namworld: It's the same but loads faster.
Chaang-Noi: mtgoxlive.com fails for me, is there a better site like it?
Bugpowdr: look at the volume
Bugpowdr: Nah dude. The got eaten
Namworld: I saw the walls form regular steps or changing place all the time
Bugpowdr: I am so bad at day trading
Bugpowdr: the twin towers fell